. >> now the supreme court oral argument in lynch dedimaya. they will decide whether the term crimes of violence" is unconstitutionally vague. >> relying on the court's decision in johnson holing holie reat-about that rang or two reasons. first the standard of vagueness applicable in immigration proceeding is not the same as in a criminal proceeding because the constitution does not require prior notice that conduct will give rise to remove and alliums laws long been administered in administrative proceedings because thereof close relation of item foreign relations and national security. second, though in any event, under the criminal vagueness standard applied in johnson 16b is not unconstitutional. as exemplified by the court's unanimous decision, in the more than 30 years that 16b has been on dirk. >> , -- didn't the going article when johnson was were -- before that it the red side all -- reside -- would be vulnerable if it was subject to same central objection. was that the government's argue. >> the united states was responding to the ar

. >> now the supreme court oral argument in lynch dedimaya. they will decide whether the term crimes of violence" is unconstitutionally vague.