medvedev's next drunken ramblings, but the secretary of the security council is lytvynenko, he was this is the head of the foreign intelligence service, and once worked. including in the staff department of the nsdc, in my time when i was the first deputy secretary of the nsdc, he is a trained professional person, although it is clear that the very internal policy of the president's office is to appoint loyal, absolutely obedient speakers to all key positions, who will express exclusively the theses that... they are offered from the bank, and in principle lytvynenko is quite in this respect such, i would say, a person, quite... predictable, this is andriy's team yermak, which today is widely spread in all spheres of state life, today is the day of the constitution, and it is clear that the main topic was probably related to how effectively the constitution of ukraine works and works in general, i will say that as my time, co-chairman of the joint committee on creating a new edition. year, we discussed the basic law for a long time and tried to make it, well, let's put it this way, no lo

military level, they simply displaced people, this is what they want to practice around kharkiv, lytvynenko believes, obviously russians think not only about kharkiv, maybe they think the same way about kyiv, maybe they think the same way about the dnipro, big cities without electricity and without water supply will turn into cities where not so many people will live, i.e. a third of the people , there two thirds can go somewhere. to live in a village or to the west of ukraine, and this is obviously putin's tactic, i and i started our conversation with this, and i will still continue with the same, can the international community now intervene in this, because in the case of zalep they didn't do it, they bombed that city, there is nothing left of that city, we see like ten... we already have aleppo in small towns, bakhmut, avdiyivka, and many, many different smaller towns and villages in the east of ukraine. when in the end the world will start talking to russia as a criminal, a war criminal, a war criminal, which is right now, well, if it is difficult to prove that this is a genocide of th

went to spy, or i'm carrying explosives to some factory there, that doesn't happen, but we we see, lytvynenkoed after six months, everything became clear, these other people in britain, bombings in bulgaria, poisoning of bulgarians, a bulgarian businessman who... gave arms to ukraine, the same situation in the czech republic, now in estonia, they just have the same impression , that they really have something radiating on their foreheads that i am a spy, and this is no longer a spy, not shtirlitsy, you understand, people have some kind of illusion that there are some such intellectual shtirlitsy sitting there and you can find their figs, but now it’s just some kind of horror, where, where is the professionalism, i’m sorry, i’m not worried about russian intelligence, but where is the professionalism, ugh, very . quickly, i understand that we don’t have much time, all the cases you mentioned are gugsh, russian military intelligence, well, duboloms, it’s obvious, chipiga and others, and let’s take them to the foreign intelligence service, that’s just the last ones spies in slovenia that i mentio

our viewers, the page of andrii smoliya, now this question is actually demonstrated, oleksandr lytvynenko, the head of the national security and defense council of ukraine, in an interview with the times, did not rule out that putin may resort to using nuclear weapons, but this is, let's say, at the moment when he will understand that he has lost everything . if hitler - it's a bullet to the head, then putin will use nuclear weapons, and we don't need a light storm from russia. why do we need him? i thought about another option, it should be a nuclear bullet to putin's head in the bunker, but the thing is, i don't think it was. a very successful statement of our current secretary of the national security and defense council, even if he thinks so, in principle, publicly to a western audience, this could not be said, because this is what scares our western partners, they are afraid of nuclear escalation, accordingly there will be more pressure us with with the aim of forcing us to make concessions, and to end the conflict on russian terms, from a tactical point of view this is not very corr

another interesting statement was made by the secretary of the national security council oleksandr lytvynenko, he says that russia is determined for a long-term war with ukraine, and in the worst case, it can turn kharkiv into a second aleppo. he stated this in an interview with the wall street journal. he recalled that in aleppo, russian aviation destroyed the electricity and water supply systems, as well as bombed hospitals and schools. then the population of the city decreased to a third of the pre-war level. they simply displaced people, this is what they want to practice around kharkiv, litvinenko believes. obviously, russians think not only about kharkiv, maybe they think the same about kyiv, maybe they think the same about the dnipro. which cities without electricity and without water supply will turn into cities where not so many people will live, i.e. a third of the people, there two/thirds can go to live somewhere in the village or to the west of ukraine, and this is obviously putin's tactic, i started our conversation with this, and i will continue the same. eh, can the world commu

another interesting statement was made by the secretary of the national security council oleksandr lytvynenkos that russia is determined for a long-term war with ukraine, and in the worst case, it can turn kharkiv into a second aleppo.

viewers, on the page of andrii smoliya, this question is actually being demonstrated now, oleksandr lytvynenkohead of the national security and defense council of ukraine in an interview with the the times didn't rule out that putin might resort to using nuclear weapons, but that's a guess. so at the moment when he will understand that he has lost everything, if hitler is a bullet in the head, then for putin it will be the use of nuclear weapons, and the world selection from russia we don't need him, why do we need him? i thought about another option, it should be a nuclear bullet to putin's head in a bunker, but the thing is, i don't think that was a very good statement by our current secretary of the national security and defense council, even if... if he is thinks, in principle , it was not possible to say this publicly to the western audience, because this is what scares our western partners, they are afraid of nuclear escalation, accordingly, they will put more pressure on us with the aim of forcing us to make concessions, even before the end of the conflict on russian conditions, from a

particular from our viewers, the page of andrii smoliya is actually showing this question: oleksandr lytvynenko, chairman of the national security and defense council of ukraine in an interview yu the times, did not exclude that putin may resort to the use of nuclear weapons, but this is, let's say, at the moment when he will understand that everything. lost, if hitler is a bullet in the head, then u for putin, it will be the use of nuclear weapons, and we don't need svitber from russia, why do we need him? i thought about another option, it should be a nuclear bullet to putin's head, in a bunker, but the thing is, i don't think that was a very good statement by our current secretary of the national security and defense council, even if he thinks so, then, in principle, public to the west. the audience could not have said this, it is what scares our western partners, they are afraid of nuclear escalation, accordingly there will be more to put pressure on us in order to force us to make concessions, even to the end of the conflict on russian terms, from a tactical point of view this is not very

understand that, relatively speaking, the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which renbo, oleksandr lytvynenko about, this is one of the risks that the ukrainian... side cannot ignore the behavior of the aggressor, taking into account the unprincipledness and his approaches on all lines of conflict, but when we say, we significantly simplify the situation about the use of tactical nuclear weapons by russia, then there can be several scenarios here, in particular, well relatively speaking, detonation of a tactical nuclear munition over the black sea, detonation of a tactical nuclear munition, well, in particular over chernobyl. and all these two scenarios, they primarily mean such a political intimidating component. the use of tactical nuclear ammunition, for example, on the front line, the effect is quite limited, because in fact it will not affect the entire front in general, it will cause only there, well, a situation on a separate part of the front, without such, well, in my opinion, even.