us, but ayas shabuddinov is with us, because he was literally everywhere, well, at bonya’s, at lyubyatenka’sthe boy shabbudinov. one of those who were not afraid. to publicly speak out in defense of ayaz shabuddinov, this is the commissioner under the president of russia for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs, boris titov. his the position is voiced by the deputy head of the expert legal center of the ombudsman, natalya ryabova. now, after there have become widespread students who, on the contrary, write that this is very useful, very important, very significant, moreover, as far as i know, in the appeal, when the consideration was considered in the appeal. as he put it, the pain points of this case are, firstly, the criminalization of relations within the framework of a service agreement. in addition, the blogger was given an obviously excessive measure of restraint; the investigation declaratively determined that educational the like center’s programs did not help entrepreneurial activity and high income generation, the ombudsman believes. first, this should be the opinion of ex

well, bonya, lyubyatenka, even rinata litvinova. who else has a lot?resident of russia for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs, boris. his position is voiced by the deputy head of the expert legal center of the ombudsman, natalya ryabova. after it became widely known that boris evich titov is defending ayaz rifatovich shubuddinov, several appeals have already been received from students who, on the contrary, write that this is very useful, very important, very significant, an appeal of a complaint against the choice of a preventive measure was considered , there. shabuddinov’s students also came, who were even ready to vouch for him and support him in every possible way. boris titov drew attention to several, as he put it, pain points in this case. firstly, to criminalize relations within the framework of a service agreement. in addition, the blogger was given an obviously excessive preventive measure; the investigation declaratively determined that the educational programs of the like center did not help entrepreneurial activity and earning