lyudmila aivar lyudmila konstantinovna good morning. well, tell me in the case of a thirteen-year-old teenager. why were the three men who killed him imputed to article 109 of causing death by negligence, was there negligence in their actions, shouldn’t they have thought, what could this all lead to ? beating, of course, definitely. you and i understand, as adult reasonable people who do not even have a legal education, that there is infliction of grievous bodily harm resulting in the death of the victim. that is, it is at least 111. this is at least up to 15 years, imprisonment and the act must be re-qualified, but this is not an isolated case, why is this funny, what is it? yes, if it were one in a million, but it happens often enough often enough, because the qualification is very difficult, so that we qualified the act as murder. we have to prove that a specific person wanted to kill another specific person for this. there she prepared an ax, a knife, a pistol, or something else, and now she had the intent to kill. and when the villains say that yes, we didn’t want to kill. we wanted to scold him. well, it happened by chance, yes, yes, well, they hit him with 33 punches, and then he took it and died, but maybe it’s possible to prescribe some exact wording, and the exact ones, let’s say, just more accurately indicate what is murder, what such intent, what is direct thought? what is indirect thought? it is clear that the 33rd blow with an ax is no longer an accidental murder. of course not. lawyer all clearly spelled out the issue of qualifications the issue of qualifications. and how do investigators understand this? here we are, let's say i take a mug and throw it at someone. yes, a person falls, hits the battery of the head and dies. this is reckless homicide. this is such a new acquisition of ours, this article number 199 of the criminal code before it was not there in soviet times, and somehow came out from this position until the collapse. sir, we did not have this qualification, all all the deaths were qualified as murders, which were, and caused by third or there, but to separate into a separate one. this wooden one was just qualifications, that is, the investigation figured out how the death came sacredly death occurred and whether there was a direct intention, an indirect one, or there was no intent, and it was divided into parts, part one, part two, part four, and the term of punishment already depended on this. and you know enough it's hard to come back to that, probably now, because uh now there are different articles that uh, well, not quite clearly. in any case, it's homicide by negligence. it is not spelled out clearly . this humanization allows the feeling of many to evade responsibility, because one thing is murder, and another thing is causing death, as a result there is nothing left. well, let's imagine that a situation has happened, while the investigator will figure out that this is a murder committed by negligence by a person who change will be sitting in the pre-trial detention center all this time, because a particularly serious article has been applied to him, therefore, here such a codification of these has occurred and is happening now. on the other side of the scale, just such cases when it is a completely unfair punishment for such difficult deeds. well, after all, what decision do we have here in our studio to return to the soviet experience, or is it finish up to smooth out all the roughness existing studio. we need to give advice that you should more clearly define the wording of the legislation, and that those guilty of murder do not escape responsibility as a crime by negligence, and that those guilty of a crime by negligence do not fall under the article of murder. understandable thanks. thank you. all of a sudden, the studio was not the honorary lawyer of russia, doctor of law, professor lyudmilah. thank you, we look every friday the whole country will look at you, like do you want a recognized classic of gagarin? the music is real blockbusters, the best films of russia and thus the unique figurative costumes were prepared not by professional fashion designers, but by culinary students. so that the products on each outfit were sent to the exhibition at the educational institution enough. shops that have been part of this popular product for decades. is the production of bread getting cut off? you will smear butter, yes, eat at the sight of the doctoral larisa always remembers the taste of childhood, although she is recognized as a delicacy, she indulges herself not often adheres to healthy diet, and the composition and appearance of modern sausage and it is slightly alarming. i think it's still added. something she still had before. do you remember, she was gray, some kind of gray. they are so straight pink and really, they give appetizing ratings, food additives and they stuf

lyudmila aivar lyudmila konstantinovna good morning. well, tell me in the case of a thirteen-year-old teenager. why were the three men who killed him charged with article 109 of causing death by negligence, was there negligence in their actions, didn’t they have to think what this whole beating could lead to, of course, of course. you and i understand, as adult reasonable people who do not even have a legal education, that there is infliction of grievous bodily harm resulting in the death of the victim. that is, it is at least 111. this is at least up to 15 years, imprisonment and deeds must be re-qualified, but this is not an isolated case, why is this funny, what is it? yes, if one were a million to us, but this happens often enough often enough, because the qualification is very difficult for us to qualify the act as murder. we have to prove that a specific person wanted to kill another specific person for this. there she prepared an ax, a knife, a pistol or something else, and now she had the intent to kill, when the villains say that yes, we didn’t want to kill. we wanted to scold him, but it happened by chance, yes, yes, well, they hit him with 33 punches, and he took it and passed away, it is possible, perhaps, to prescribe some exact formulations, but the exact ones, let's say, simply designate more accurately what is murder, what is intent, what is a direct thought, what is an indirect thought? it is clear that the 33rd blow with an ax is no longer an accidental murder. of course not. lawyer all clearly spelled out the issue of qualifications the issue of qualifications. and how do investigators understand this? here we are, let's say i take a mug and throw it at someone. yes, a person falls, hits the battery of the head and dies. here is the murder imprudence. this is our new acquisition, this article number 199 of the criminal code before it was not there in soviet times, and somehow they got out of this position before the collapse. sir, we didn't have that qualification, all deaths were qualified as homicides that were, uh, caused by a third party. so much so that i was to allocate to a separate one. this wooden one was just qualifications. that is, the investigation was sorting out how death came, sacred death came, and whether there was direct indirect fiction or there was no intent and it was subdivided into parts, the first part, the second, the third, the fourth, and the term of punishment already depended on this. and you know, it's quite difficult to come back to this, probably now, because now there are various articles that, uh, well, not quite clearly. in any case, it's homicide by negligence. it is not spelled out clearly ended humanization allows the feeling of many to evade responsibility, because one thing is murder, and another thing is causing death as a result of accidents there. well, let's imagine that a situation has happened while the investigator will figure out that this is a murder completely by negligence, a person who is changing will sit in a pre-trial detention center all this time, because a particularly serious article has been applied to him, therefore, here such a codification of these has occurred and is happening now accordingly, it is necessary here, uh, nevertheless, to call on the legislator, probably to revise the scales more than then, just such cases when it is a completely unfair punishment for such hard deeds. well, after all, what is the solution here in our studio, we bear it to return to the soviet experience or still add to smooth out all the roughness that exists murder did not escape responsibility, as the commission of a crime by negligence, and those guilty of committing a crime by negligence did not fall under the article of murder. it is clear thanks to the internal studio was honorary russian lawyer doctor of law professor lyudmilaon the big screen, a rare short-eared owl, which became a victim of street photographers in st. petersburg miraculously managed to save the red book bird, caring citizens reported to the police. it turned out that there were no documents; moreover, the bird turned out to be seriously damaged wings. now she is undergoing treatment, then she will be placed in a special wide aviary for a bird, they are unlikely to be released for too long, she was in trouble. what kind of eyes are on the sides of the road, really our auto expert, especially at night, so what is the first thing you need to remember when driving at night. let's see domestic tourism is gaining momentum, including automobile tourism, and this year, auto travelers, apparently, there will be even more this type of holiday has its undeniable advantages, the main one, of which freedom of movement minus, in fact, one is not driven by you. and you, considering our distance on the way, you can be whole during the day, including at n