judge lyudmila arrestova has been working in sevastopol since 2001, first as an assistant prosecutor,to deputy chief of staff of the local district administrative court in 2013, she was appointed to a position in the court of the donetsk district administrative court after the occupation of donetsk in the 14th year, this court was transferred to slovyansk before the creation of the higher anti-corruption court, the sentences of judges in cases of nabu in ukraine are almost no instead, only in the last three years , more than 20 ministers of themis were brought to justice, they were convicted of corruption , abuse of influence and driving under the influence, and many of the most influential judges who are behind multimillion-dollar corruption schemes and still have not been punished by all means to delay the development of this case in court by filing a petition or by submitting there certificates from medical institutions about those who are sick in them and cannot go to the meeting, etc., the case of judge mykola chausa, he was exposed for bribery for 150,000 dollars back in 2016, b

berlinov has not yet been dismissed, the judge of the donetsk district administrative court lyudmila arrestova has a russian passport and has spent more than 250 days in the crimea occupied by russia over the past four years. year on the basis of the so-called treaty on the admission of crimea to russia, according to which citizens of ukraine and stateless persons who at that time permanently lived on the peninsula were recognized as citizens of the russian federation, at the same time she also received an individual tax number, the arrestee told journalists that she did not receive another passport and assumed that it was issued to her automatically, instead, the journalists found out that the ukrainian judge used this russian visa at least once when she was tested for coronavirus lyudmila arrestova also assures that she is forced to go to the occupied crimea to visit her parents there , however, apparently not only in 2018, she celebrated the birthday of the daughter of judge lyudmila arrestova in a sevastopol cafe in 2001, she worked in sevastopol, first as an assistant prosecutor, later sh

ukrainian judge used this russian ausweis at least once when she was tested for coronavirus lyudmila arrestovao assures that she was forced to go to the occupied crimea to visit her parents there , however, apparently not only in 2018, she celebrated the birthday of judge ludmila's daughter in a sevastopol cafe the arrested woman has worked in sevastopol since 2001, first as an assistant prosecutor, later she rose to the position of deputy chief of staff of the local district administrative court, in 2013 she was appointed to the post of donetsk judge district administrative court after the occupation of donetsk in the 14th year, this court was transferred to slovyansk before the creation of the higher anti-corruption court , there were almost no sentences for judges in nabu cases in ukraine , instead, only in the last three years , more than 20 servants of themis were brought to justice, they were convicted for corruption, abuse of influence and drunken driving, and many of the most influential judges who are behind multimillion-dollar corruption schemes and have not yet been punished by all

there, however, apparently not only in 2018, she celebrated the birthday of her daughter, judge lyudmila arrestovaastopol cafe. since 2001, she has worked in sevastopol, first as an assistant prosecutor, later she rose to the position of deputy chief of staff of the local district administrative court in 2013, she was appointed to the position of judge of the donetsk district administrative court after the occupation of donetsk in the 14th year, this court was transferred to slovyansk before the creation of the higher of the anti-corruption court , there were almost no sentences for judges in cases of embezzlement in ukraine , on the contrary, only in the last three years before the

georgy shabayev, and it turned out that the judge of the donetsk district administrative court , lyudmila arrestovacaped. where they quickly registered a criminal case and now a person is going to the judicial authorities under the article of interference with the activities of the journalist. now a person with a journalist is going to the prosecutor's office for questioning. how do you assess that? well, this is definitely not interference. i don't know, during the court session, he did something there that would violate the process, for example , he voted there, for example, he allowed the secretary to work during the court session. that is, it could be interpreted as interference. and when publicly significant things are published information that is confirmed by specific data. of course, this is not an interference , it is a time. well, unfortunately, we have a system built that any statement written by a person is registered, that is, it cannot be registered, and accordingly this mechanism is launched. and this is not just registered, a person is being interrogated, you understand, you are alr

possible interference in the work of the judge of the donetsk district administrative court, lyudmila arrestovaabout this radio svoboda reported on the service of the prosecutor general's office , on july 27, the case was opened by an investigator of the national police in slovyansk, donetsk region, at the request of judge a herself on the journalist of the scheme project, georgy shabayev, was called in for questioning, he is the author of the investigation into the arrest of the journalist of radio svoboda, they found out that she had russian citizenship in addition, it was found that the arresting judge often traveled to crimea after its occupation from 2018 to 2022, she spent a total of 250 days there. of the so-called referendum in 2014, and the trip to the peninsula was explained by the judge as the need to visit the parents mykola georgy shabaev journalist of the scheme project joins from our broadcast i congratulate you i congratulate you thank you for joining georgy well actually, as of now , as i understand it, the case is already closed , this is already the end of this story. is it p