lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine from 2015 to 18. then, as a member of the working group, she found no violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr baben, who systematically put pressure on judge serhii bondar. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhii bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine. and so serhiy bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, but... lyudmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really defend herself before the judge, as part of the group signed, made up the conclusion that there was no pressure on the judge, mr. babenko, such a classy head of the court, therefore he actually has no right to defend. the explanation of

however , lyudmila volkova, for example, got into ubks. she is a former judge of the kharkiv district administrative court. experts had many questions about volkova's integrity. from 2015 to 18, lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine. then, as part of the working group, she did not find any violations in the actions chairman of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr babenka, who systematically pressured judge serhiy bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant. owned by ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhii bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine. and so serhii bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that could actually protect him rights, however, lyudmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really defend herself before the judge, and...

from 2015 to 18, lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine.he working group, she did not find any violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr babenko, who systematically pressured judge serhiy bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. serhiy bondarenko's history of conflict. with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court in which bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine, and serhiy bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, however, lyudmila volkova, as the person who could accept the relevant decision and really stand up for the judge, ah, as a member of the group, she signed the conclusion that there was no pressure on the judge. mr. babenko is such a classy head of the court, that's why he has no right to defend himself. the explanation of this story by volkov

mostly, because of the decisions made by lyudmila volkova.mple, she voted against the dismissal of maidan judges olena izovitova vakim, as in 2013 she banned peaceful gatherings in kharkiv in support of euromaidan and andrii klyuchnyk, who in 2014 threw into custody the activist of the revolution of dignity oleksandr kostur. first the year of the commission showed that this commission really needed crisis management, both at the beginning of its activities and when, in fact, we in the kkks were left without leadership, but ms. volkova worked calmly for herself. did not apply such new skills and therefore these claims still remain, and not only lyudmila volkova's decisions affected the efficiency of the work of the higher qualification commission during the year. on march 27 , roman ignatov, the head of the committee of the communist party of ukraine, resigned at his own request. in december of last year , information appeared in the mass media that he allegedly has russian citizenship. the head of the vkk himself denied this. at the beginning

lyudmila volkova was from 2015 to 18 years old a member of the council of judges of ukraine.p, she did not find any violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region , volodymyr baben, who systematically pressured judge serhii bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhii bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is well known. and here is serhiy bondarenko appealed to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, however, ludmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really stand up for the judge, signed as part of the group, concluded that the pressure there was no judge, mr. babenko, such a cool head of the court, so he defended. actually has no right. the explanation of this story by volkova herself was specific. i directly spent three, wel

ruslan sydorovych, lyudmila volkova and roman kydesiuk expertly manage to conduct the fastest interviews with candidates. for example, one of them lasted only 7 minutes with olena mikhalyuk, assistant to the head of the northern commercial court of appeal. please briefly describe your motivation for becoming a judge. first, how convenient will it be for you to move? mr. roman, but it won't be too much either. two judges of one family. these are all questions from the commission to mykhalyuk. thus, without further clarification, the members of the supreme court of appeals decided that the candidate was suitable for the position of judge and recommended her to the lyubashiv district court of odesa region. the composition of the higher qualification commission, updated within the framework of the judicial reform , was entrusted with titanic tasks and responsibilities. however, all members of the central committee of the communist party of ukraine went to high positions consciously and of their own free will. so we hope the commission will be able to restore. high level of efficiency. and fo