and how do i know, it’s clear macedonia macedonia how i found out, well, on the internet in a search engine, the address comes up agency macedoniadress and phone number is smart. you yourself are opera. you know that chistuha eases the conscience and shortens the term , i know, only i didn’t kill the hunchback. where is the motive elementary, he wrote us a statement against you that you wanted to release the suspect for the loot. you threatened him. i said he's a jerk they are. sledak is that a threat to your trunk, from which your fingers banged on it? can you explain it? i also have such halibis for myself, like baked pies. but they don't mean anything, it's good if i shot then where are the traces of powder gases on my hands captain. what are powder gases? don't you understand that the colleagues of the murdered kurbatov are given what they have to bake you near nizhny tagil until the end of life? so rodionov petr mikhailovich rented an apartment. here he rented his data for a month, well, daily rent, and this morning the term ended. already returned the key. no, the door slams, usually the tenants leave the keys in the mailb

macedonia became north macedonia. so this is exactly what i wanted to answer in the continuation of my start of the answer to your question. north macedonia has done probably the toughest and hardest decision compared to any other country which hasjoined or willjoin the european union. so let's not forget that during those 17 years, we could not progress on our path to the european union because of regional and bilateral issues on the balkans. there are many, i call them identity issues. so if we see bosnia and herzegovina, if we see kosovo, if we see the whole region, what has happened through the past 30 years after the dissolution of yugoslavia, even if we see today ukraine what is happening, this is also an identity issue which is happening there. north macedonia has proven that through diplomacy there can be sustainable solutions for identity issues. we have made these tough decisions. so you are right, we have changed the name of the country in order to become members of nato and in order to progress to the european union integration. also, we have done agreement with our neighbours bulgaria, which decision was also a very hard deci

military troops in the western balkans has increased, especially when we are talking about macedonia , north macedonia and montenegro, so nato helped to end two brutal wars in the balkans, it is worth mentioning our help in kosovo and in sarajevo, i will not say much about whether the mandate of the mission will be renewed. i want to say that no one is interested we have not renewed it, we understand that the presence of the eu and the assistance of nato is an auxiliary factor for overcoming the challenges that bosnia is currently facing. of course, the duchy has many different fears regarding the presence of nato troops, the international presence in bosnia may worsen the situation , secretary, and we constantly hear nuclear narrative, the threat of nuclear blackmail from russia, and we understand that nato is now assessing this entire nuclear situation, so i have a question: what is your assessment of the nuclear risk and whether this risk should increase are you ready people carry your turbines ready for any threat for any attack on any nato ally member we must deter nuclear threats as well of cour

macedonia? >> yes. i do this sometimes with my guest, i like to put them on the spot, because it's not fair because you're not a walking encyclopedia. north macedonia montenegro in 2017, albania and croatia, former members of yugoslavia, 2009. at one point in this debate, really going back to the early post cold war years, early 90s, that these countries, tiny countries, should be a part of nato was a nonstarter, wasn't it? too much territory to defend. what's the interest of giving article five protection to countries like this when it might be difficult to actually protect them? >> i think the thinking behind nato expansion, some people prefer to use a term nato enlargement, although i'm not quite sure what the differences between those two words is, but one of the premises was it could help consolidate countries as democracies. by bringing them into nato there is also in the nato trader a commitment to democracy. there's a democratization agenda that is connected to the enlargement of nato. but there's also the sense that, and this has been imperfect, but the sense that nato helps to resolve regional security problems. so, instead of having, let

macedonia. yes. i do this sometimes to my guess. i like to put them on the spot, which is not fair. not a walking encyclopedia. north macedonia and 2020 montenegro tiny country in 2017, albania and croatia former members of yugoslavia 2009, you know at one point in this debate really going back to the early post cold war years early 1990s the notion that these tiny countries should be part of nato was as a non-starter, wasn't it? it'd be too much too much territory to defend. what's the interest of giving article 5 protection to countries like this one. it might be difficult to actually protect them in thinking behind nato expansion or some people prefer to use the term nato enlargement. although i'm not quite sure what the difference is between between those between those two words, but i think one of the premises was that it could help consolidate countries as democracies. so by bringing them into nato there is in the nato charter also a commitment to democracy. so there's a democratization agenda that's connected to the enlargement of nato. but there's also the sense that and you know, this has been imperfect but the sense