yesterday, the chair and ranking member of the armed services committee adam smith and mack thornberry released a statement that said, part of which, for 59 straight years, ndaa has passed because members of congress and presidents of both parties have set aside their own policy objectives and partisan preferences and put the needs of our military personnel and american security first. the time has come to do that again. given that it's the very end of the congress, is this late in the date for this bill typically to pass? >> you know, it's not ideal. but it's not atypical. we've seen a lot of up to the wire ndaas in the past. certainly, let's be honest, in the last 50 years, we've seen a lot of up to the wire funding bills passed. and it looks like we're in that situation again. the ndaa is one of those things that the members take great pride, saying the military is a political institution. the national institution of united states is america is a political goal. we can make this happen. mack thornberry who is the ranking member on the house services committee, a republican, former c