almost three years ago at&t applied for the court instructs the jury use to upgrade this to a 9 macro facility. then in march 2011 without the required i condition of the building permits at at the went ahead and started to install it's macro equipment on the roof. one the dentists in the building filed a complaint. in october 2012 almost a year and a half later they held a director's meeting in which at&t said forgot about our ongoing site we're about to get a permit so let's move it from the roof to a ground floor to which d b i respond go ahead. there's two problems here. first, the 1976 soft story wood building is not up to current building codes for seismic sate. the technical engineer who has 50 years experience was to view the site. the drs. comment was no at&t was to be permitted on the roof without a complete seismic upgrade of the this. so in the absence of a service upgrade is a skeptic issue that was referred to in the previous hearing. the second problem although this application has been in the pipeline for 3 years until residents brought it to their attention both at&t and the c