magna carta , which only restated and carta, which only restated and reaffirmed the ancient common lawaw, was sealed before parliament even existed, and so is literally beyond parliament's remit. the unwritten constitution for which magna carta speaks is likewise out of parliament's reach. the law of the land just is . we all know, the land just is. we all know, without having to be told that it's wrong to kill, to do harm, to steal , to lie. parliament to steal, to lie. parliament government, the state are no more and no less than creation's of human beings. that which is created by human beings stands beneath human beings , is beneath human beings, is subordinate to human beings, serves and does not rule. human beings . remember that too, when beings. remember that too, when talk turns to artificial intelligence as the various types in the state know, the inalienable rights of people are constant. as the north star. many of the state's minions may have chosen to forget as much. plenty of parliament wizards are like so many other people, genuinely unaware of the truth of the law. lack

magna carta , which only restated and carta, which only restated and reaffirmed the ancient common lawaw, was sealed before parliament even existed, and so is literally beyond parliament's remit. the unwritten constitution for which magna carta speaks is likewise out of parliament's reach. the law of the land just is . we all know, the land just is. we all know, without having to be told that it's wrong to kill, to do harm, to steal , to lie. parliament to steal, to lie. parliament government, the state are no more and no less than creation's of human beings. that which is created by human beings stands beneath human beings , is beneath human beings, is subordinate to human beings, serves and does not rule. human beings . remember that too, when beings. remember that too, when talk turns to artificial intelligence as the various types in the state know, the inalienable rights of people are constant. as the north star. many of the state's minions may have chosen to forget as much. plenty of parliament wizards are like so many other people, genuinely unaware of the truth of the law. lack

it is the first right listed in the sixth amendment, but its origins go back to the magna carta, one of the most important documents in the history of democracy, written by a group of 13th century barrens to protect their rights and property against a tyrannical king. the magna carta declared in english spelled a little differently than today, we shall not deny or delay justice and right neither the end, which is justice nor the mean, whereby we may attain to the end, and that is the law. there been protecting the right of all free men to speedy disposition of trials. the right is a cornerstone of the judicial system, meaning a person cannot be held for an unreasonable amount of time awaiting trial. it's a fundamental constitutional right that impacts a modern day criminal case that could help preserve the very principles the magna carta established more than 800 years ago. and that is the georgia election interference case. today, fulton county judge scott mcafee ruled that donald trump and 16 other codefendants will be tried separately from trump's former attorneys, sidney powell a

indeed, the whole notion of rights even predates the magna carta . in 1215, the magna carta.illiam the conqueror, in his coronation oath , promised to coronation oath, promised to maintain historic rights. the antics city of our liberties is quite extraordinary and indeed, unlike any other country and many other countries , including many other countries, including notably the united states, have built their own rights, their own freedoms, their own democracy, their own rule of law on ours. and it is much better for our rights to come from our history than to be misconstrued by a foreign and unaccountable court . right. by a foreign and unaccountable court. right. and this is crucial because the court has consistently demonstrated that it will seek to expand its powers and scope well beyond those that we intended to give it when we signed the convention. so in 1978, strasbourg introduced its method of judicial interpretation known as the living instrument doctrine , in which it claims the doctrine, in which it claims the right to develop the convention to recognise new rights

as if the uk doesn't have a powered history of human rights dating back to magna carta and the echr is to manage just fine. none of this is particularly novel, nor should it be particularly controversial. as home secretary, trees and make a call for britain to leave the echr and it was because of the party policy under michael howard to lead the dust might leave the refugee convention. i am really advocating for reform. while the underlying framework is both a connecting factor to the problem and a barrier to certain fixes, some countries have been more successful in tackling illegal migration bill brothers. scalia had to cope with two major waves of illegal maritime migration across the pacific in the last two decades. in the last wave, before they stopped at the crosses, more than 52,000 unauthorised maritime arrivals and around 1100 deaths at sea were recorded between 2008 and 2014. operation southern borders so boats intercepted and then those on board were either returned once they had travelled or taken to immigration detention centres in third countries. there were some 400 ille

magna carta. so this isn't new. indeed , in terms of the and indeed, in terms of the european court of human rights, how it functions if cases do pass that filter, get into it in the first place, and very few do, it operates a legal doctrine, what's called a margin of appreciation. so when deciding where the balance has been, state and private, individual because that's what stokes most of the controversy calls it, gives significant weight to what the states position is as regards to where that balance should fall. >> and just just, just, just just a final point before i go , just a final point before i go, richard. even the former secretary of state for defence, ben wallace , he said that ben wallace, he said that actually the echr held back the military forces from carrying out essential special forces operations overseas . he's we operations overseas. he's we can't do what the states does . can't do what the states does. and that surely is the point . i and that surely is the point. i mean, things like the united

magna carta. so this isn't new. indeed , in terms of the and indeed, in terms of the european court of human rights, how it functions if cases do pass that filter, get into it in the first place, and very few do, it operates a legal doctrine, what's called a margin of appreciation. so when deciding where the balance has been, state and private, individual because that's what stokes most of the controversy calls it, gives significant weight to what the states position is as regards to where that balance should fall. >> and just just, just, just just a final point before i go , just a final point before i go, richard. even the former secretary of state for defence, ben wallace , he said that ben wallace, he said that actually the echr held back the military forces from carrying out essential special forces operations overseas . he's we operations overseas. he's we can't do what the states does . can't do what the states does. and that surely is the point . i and that surely is the point. i mean, things like the united

is all thatis magna carta and the echr is all that is holding us back from becoming russia, americaming russia, america, canada, new zealand and japan seem to manage just fine. none of this is particularly novel, nor should it be particularly controversial as home secretary theresa may called for britain to leave the echr and it was conservative party policy under michael howard to leave the refugee convention . refugee convention. >> well , this was a remarkable >> well, this was a remarkable speech. it really was. no one could have imagined anybody, any home secretary could have made that speech, frankly, just a couple of years ago. warm words indeed. but is it enough? i have to tell you, this is my take. tice's take. it's not enough. it's nothing like enough . it's it's nothing like enough. it's a lot more is needed urgently. rapidly. why because there are millions and millions of economic migrants from across the world who are now targeting the world who are now targeting the european union and the united kingdom in a major way. and they are economic migrants . and they are econ

is all thatis magna carta and the echr is all that is holding us back from becoming russia, americaming russia, america, canada, new zealand and japan seem to manage just fine. none of this is particularly novel, nor should it be particularly controversial as home secretary theresa may called for britain to leave the echr and it was conservative party policy under michael howard to leave the refugee convention . refugee convention. >> well , this was a remarkable >> well, this was a remarkable speech. it really was. no one could have imagined anybody, any home secretary could have made that speech, frankly, just a couple of years ago. warm words indeed. but is it enough? i have to tell you, this is my take. tice's take. it's not enough. it's nothing like enough . it's it's nothing like enough. it's a lot more is needed urgently. rapidly. why because there are millions and millions of economic migrants from across the world who are now targeting the world who are now targeting the european union and the united kingdom in a major way. and they are economic migrants . and they are econ

against our magna carta.against our oldest laws by doing what she has done by stopping an innocent man ? an innocent man innocent man? an innocent man who has not been charged? we are in alleged innocence about this country. >> there is no agenda. >> there is no agenda. >> there is no agenda. >> the one thing about this country that makes brilliant, there is no alleged . there is no alleged. >> let's be clear. >> he's in presumption of innocence. >> you don't have to prove your innocence morally. >> he is a terrible man. morally he is a terrible man. >> we can't have. what about morality of the baron lancaster of kimbolton ? that's worth of kimbolton? that's worth looking at. >> why don't you have a look at that? so, no, absolutely . that? so, no, absolutely. >> and just to be clear, tanya, if i can pick up on your point about magna clause 39. about magna carta clause 39. now, something we now, this was something we understood 1215, no understood in 1215, right? no free is be arrested or free man is to be arr

against our magna carta.against our oldest laws by doing what she has done by stopping an innocent man ? an innocent man innocent man? an innocent man who has not been charged? we are in alleged innocence about this country. >> there is no agenda. >> there is no agenda. >> there is no agenda. >> the one thing about this country that makes brilliant, there is no alleged . there is no alleged. >> let's be clear. >> he's in presumption of innocence. >> you don't have to prove your innocence morally. >> he is a terrible man. morally he is a terrible man. >> we can't have. what about morality of the baron lancaster of kimbolton ? that's worth of kimbolton? that's worth looking at. >> why don't you have a look at that? so, no, absolutely . that? so, no, absolutely. >> and just to be clear, tanya, if i can pick up on your point about magna clause 39. about magna carta clause 39. now, something we now, this was something we understood 1215, no understood in 1215, right? no free is be arrested or free man is to be arr

the magna carta of 1215, the habeas corpus act of 1679, and the bill of rights of 1689. all these had significant influence upon the framers of your constitution. in fact, our political and legal philosophers, such as locke and blackstone were often quoted here on the floor of independence hall in philadelphia as regards the military debates. there is no doubt that the delegates were only too well aware of those crises in english history, where king or parliament used excessive power over the army. as a result, the british army act, which is somewhat similar to your army appropriations act, must be passed by parliament annually. if this were not to happen, the army would essentially cease to exist and i would be out of a job. your constitution limits the period of appropriations for your own army to two years. still, although much of the heritage and outlook of the framers of your constitution was english, they also showed some great ingenuity in coming up with some unique combinations of checks and balances on your central government's control of the armed forces. these

as if the uk doesn't have a proud history of human rights dating back to magna carta and the echr isinking. ..the supreme court on the basis of our association... newsnight spoke earlier this month to one of her close allies. it has had a creeping role. it's her view, is no longer simply about avoiding those kind of atrocities, that sort of tyranny. it is now becoming involved in all kind of things. you'll remember when david cameron was prime minister, he resisted insistence of the european court that people in prison should be given votes. big questions after the court of appeal in london ruled injune, that the government's policy of flying cross—channel migrants to rwanda does not comply with the uk's obligations under the echr. the uk supreme court is hearing a government appeal against that next month. newsnight understands that the government is working out a series of options, depending on what the supreme court decides. a government loss will put uk membership front and centre. one minister tells me. an outright withdrawal was described as unlikely, that would be like another

and on loan the magna carta. >> the declaration is not that visible it has been faded. >> we have the stone imprints. you can see the actual declaration. i went to see the connection of july 4, 1776 the original document. but then you can see the prince as well. christmas if i understand every document a president is responsible for in his administration does not come to you automatically after he leaves office or she leaves office quester. >> every presidential record is a permanent record that is correct. >> that includes tweets question went digital, everything? >> what's it would include everything. and everything in the white house as well. everyone working for the president progressive poster an average citizen who comes off the street and say i'd like to see his letters jon kennedy wrote to somebody or another. can anyone off the street get access to these letters? >> absolutely. presidential record of the property of the american people you might have to make an appointment we ask you make an appointment for going to visit one of our facilities. you have the archivists that ar

think of magna carta. the american government is very different.overnment does not grant rights to the people. the people delegate powers to the government. the people are sovereign. and so madison was concerned that if there were a bill of rights that any rights not listed would be assumed that we do not possess them. ultimately, he comes around and introduces the bill of rights and the first congress to bring the antifederalists on board to create unity. if we go about this carefully, we can make this work. the bill of rights can become a sort of schoolmaster perhaps to the american people, where we teach ourselves our own rights and responsibilities. >> objects, the bill of rights was a victory for the anti-federalist. it is something we take for granted today. >> that is correct. about half the states when they ratified the constitution proposed additional amendments. most of the states had adopted the constitution immediately after the declaration of independence in 1776. in most of the states they had a supper bill of rights. -- separate bill

is all thatis magna carta and the echr is all that is holding us back from becoming russia, americaming russia, america, canada, new zealand and japan seem to manage just fine. none of this is particularly novel, nor should it be particularly controversial as home secretary theresa may called for britain to leave the echr and it was conservative party policy under michael howard to leave the refugee convention . refugee convention. >> well , this was a remarkable >> well, this was a remarkable speech. it really was. no one could have imagined anybody, any home secretary could have made that speech, frankly, just a couple of years ago. warm words indeed. but is it enough? i have to tell you, this is my take. tice's take. it's not enough. it's nothing like enough . it's it's nothing like enough. it's a lot more is needed urgently. rapidly. why because there are millions and millions of economic migrants from across the world who are now targeting the world who are now targeting the european union and the united kingdom in a major way. and they are economic migrants . and they are econ

doesn't like the west, i will go out of my way to talk about kind of the western canon and the magna cartaand our constitution, because that throws them off balance. they're not expecting the muslim do to say that. but you're right, there is a gender there is a minority discourse. not everything in this book probably in that way. maybe that's the sequel i love that. it's such a good. okay. oh, man. here's what i would say and i can only speak to my own experience with this. when i was working for barack obama, i was the only female spokesperson in the press office. and i always felt and these were many people who were my friends then were my today, but i always like maybe i had to replicate who they were right if their approaches were, i'm going to yell at reporters and i'm going to slam the phone and then i'm going to brag about it or i'm going to send like a f few blog, curse laden email. and that's going to be how i am. and i always thought, don't that doesn't feel really like me. but if i'm going to be like them, be tough in this business, have to be like that. it probably took me turn

as if the uk doesn't have a proud history of human rights dating back to magna carta and the echr isis magna carta and the echr is all that is holding us back from becoming russia , america, canada becoming russia, america, canada , new zealand and japan seem to manage just fine in strong stuff. >> i mean , you could eclipse >> i mean, you could eclipse pretty much every single sentence that she said yesterday. and i know that it went down well with the vast majority of our viewers. and i can tell that from going can tell that from what's going on fight can tell that from what's going on right now, on in the inbox right now, actually. views gbnews.com. actually. gb views gbnews.com. today asking kind today i am asking you what kind of country want britain of country you want britain to be. is our culture? tell me be. what is our culture? tell me that. be. what is our culture? tell me that . what is be. what is our culture? tell me that. what is british be. what is our culture? tell me that . what is british culture that. what is british culture here? because all too often we just get

no freejainstshall magna carta. prison, dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way except way preceded against except by the judgement the lawful judgement of his peers the the land. peers and the law of the land. so just sort of goes against so it just sort of goes against our tradition. our entire english tradition. it goes law. are goes against the law. what are you insane. goes against the law. what are you insane . and do you doing? it's insane. and do you doing? it's insane. and do you think she will resign after this? she has to resign. i'm not saying but she must. saying she will, but she must. if has, i mean, hopefully saying she will, but she must. if will, s, i mean, hopefully saying she will, but she must. if will, because i, hopefully saying she will, but she must. if will, because thispefully saying she will, but she must. if will, because thispe'just she will, because this is just outrageous. >> mirror now, >> it's okay. the mirror now, this it's odd when this is a it's odd wh

. >> the rule of law and common law in the united kingdom is changed from magna carta , from changed diggers to the pentridge martyrs and all the pentridge martyrs and all the way through. and what we would see in the united kingdom is again, bright, bright lawyers, people in parliament, people in the civil service working together to find a system that enables us to, in act legislation that allowed us to have rwanda as a unilateral policy that can work but not be challenged by an organisation, as we saw in this particular case where we had one effective case where we had one effective case officer, lawyer sitting there on a sunday afternoon making that decision without the full court. so i think that's an important factor . would it important factor. would it change us dramatically ? no, it change us dramatically? no, it would hurt those people who feel that we need to have some sort of standing in the world by being part of this. but actually, the most important part would british rights part is would the british rights of be changed so of people be changed so fundamentally we end

this , actually, she has violated this, actually, she has violated one of the few clauses of the magna cartaat no free man shall be seized , imprisoned, man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed , exiled dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against except by the lawful judgement of his peers and the law of the land denied. >> she has literally read an article. she knows nothing more than that. she could know it all and still shouldn't have done it because we have a due process of which she is a serious part. >> she sits in the commons where law is made , so she should law is made, so she should understand the already understand the laws already exist and it's for the law to deal russell brand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst russell brand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing.;ell brand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing. the3rand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing. the other that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing. the other thing; the first thing. the other thing

this , actually, she has violated this, actually, she has violated one of the few clauses of the magna cartaat no free man shall be seized , imprisoned, man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed , exiled dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against except by the lawful judgement of his peers and the law of the land denied. >> she has literally read an article. she knows nothing more than that. she could know it all and still shouldn't have done it because we have a due process of which she is a serious part. >> she sits in the commons where law is made , so she should law is made, so she should understand the already understand the laws already exist and it's for the law to deal russell brand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst russell brand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing.;ell brand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing. the3rand that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing. the other that's exist and it's for the law to deafirst thing. the other thing; the first thing. the other thing

offended by these un—pc scenes , as by these un—pc scenes, as britain is great with having written the magna cartaspeare and the english translation of the bible. and for all of the non—pc comedy that influenced the vaudeville of america . so and vaudeville of america. so and a great line to finish the email bad guys of all sorts are afraid of being laughed at. well, what a great, great and articulate email that was. it's time now for this . it is 1030 and so it's for this. it is 1030 and so it's time for tomorrow's front pages , 1031, by the way, for the pedants out there, the education ministry keeps secret files on critics of school policy . critics of school policy. department for education is keeping files, monitoring the social media activity of some of the country's leading educational experts . this is an educational experts. this is an observer exclusive . at least observer exclusive. at least nine experts have uncovered files held on them. some as long as 60 pages. one individual even discovered the department compiled an excel spreadsheet in which officials had detailed who she interact

as if the uk doesn't have a proud history of human rights dating back to magna carta and the echr isrussia , america, from becoming russia, america, canada , new zealand and japan canada, new zealand and japan seem to manage just fine , and seem to manage just fine, and none of this is particularly novel, nor should it be particularly controversial . as particularly controversial. as home secretary dumas called for britain to leave the echr and it was conservative party policy under michael howard to leave the refugee convention . i am the refugee convention. i am merely advocating for a form now while the underlying framework is both a contributing factor to the problem and a barrier to certain fixes, some countries have been more successful in tackling illegal migration than others. australia alia had to cope with two major waves of illegal maritime migration across the pacific in the last two decades. in the last wave they were before they stopped they were before they stopped the crossings more than 52,000 unauth authorised maritime arrivals and arrive , and around arrivals and a

benjamin went further when he said that caroline dinenage has violated one of the few clauses of the magna cartan englishman's property may not be arbitrary , seized or stripped arbitrary, seized or stripped from him without the lawful judgement of his peers , he must judgement of his peers, he must resign or be fired immediately. i'm inclined to agree with him. they dame caroline dinenage has got to go . so if you're just got to go. so if you're just joining me, welcome on board. before we get stuck into the debate, here's what else is coming today for the great coming up today for the great british debate. this hour. i'm asking it time to house asking is it time to house migrants tents now with the migrants in tents now with the cost of housing migrants in hotels hitting millions of pounds no slowdown in pounds a day and no slowdown in their it time all their arrival, is it time all migrants who arrive illegally , migrants who arrive illegally, all are housed in tents. migrants who arrive illegally, all are housed in tents . and at all are housed in tents. and at four 50th royal roundup time,