so, again, just broadly speaking, three kind of maine buckets, if you will. one is the people but it. first and foremost, outcomes for the existing residents, this is not a plan that is principally for the benefit of the people who come behind them but for the folks who are living there today. secondly, and kind of the heart of what we have done today is really building a quality housing, infrastructure. a lot of this stuff has deteriorated in need significant reinvestment, and korea will talk a lot about that. and we are not try to korea and thailand. we very much believe that what we're trying to do to the extent that these of become isolated from the neighborhoods around them or neighborhoods have sealed themselves off in some cases, separating housing from parts or whatever it would be, we are really trying to be part of a broader initiative. we're not trying to korean all the amenities and facilities that are around, and that is particularly true in the view -- which are not trying to create all of the amenities. -- we are not. what belongs where, and wh

also this has become an issue the bucket does it manages to bring together three of the main issues that of forefront of the european political map these are the three main concerns in europe at the moment they are terrorism immigration and islam and this bunker if you like manages to symbolize all of these in one go and therefore in many ways is being instrumental lies by politicians who don't necessarily have very efficient solutions to the real economic problems that we're facing to the real political issues that we're facing and they manage to detract attention from these very real issues through a cheap populism disguised as a concern for concern for security and women's rights but it really is nothing more than cheap populism because in many ways it really is an affront to the very values that are at the core of european identity things like freedom of conscience freedom of religion that are so very essential to european identity and we have fought so hard to achieve and maintain ok mona from go do you do agree with the g. populism. i think this is much more a result of silence wha

we went up in a bucket under one of the bridges that was one of the main bridges that i drive over every day. my wife and kids drive over it. he said, take a hammer and attack on that country. i did. it was quite sobering to see chunks of that country to fall. -- chunks of that concrete fall. this is one of the bridges that most traffic in my community drives back and forth on. my concern is this. we continue to build more bridges every year because people want to have more and better bridges. we spend more money, and then we continue to need to repair the bridges and that costs more money with each passing year. it seems much more of our money goes to repairing bridges that already exist, that already have defects, building new bridges, and the states are not spending money on the maintenance. i'm from upstate new york. we have seen the devastating effect on our bridges. i am not sure if this is a comment or question. are we doing enough in terms of the preventative maintenance? are we spiraling out of control? are we going to be able to have enough, to appropriate enough money to meet