he would leave his mother's house in mainstreet and would walk through the meadows in the fields in the forests of that area, taking notes, taking notes on every bit of natural phenomenon that he saw, whether it was when the ice melted from walden pond, the sweet maple leaves unfurled in the spring, when migrating birds came through, he takes notes on everything. he had this wonderful hat that he wore at this time, it wasn't quite a top hat, he had a larger crown than usual, and he had built for himself a platform inside the crown of that hat in which he would place botanical samples and he would take those home and press them between this large collection of flute music that belonged to his father and was heavy and he's making his own herbarium. he's pressing all of these specimens that he can store in the addict of his mother's house on main street. he actually, one day he puts, i wish i could remember the name of the kind of plant, but he puts a collection of seedpods in the crown of his hat on that little platform, and they are kind of seedpods that explodes with seeds that are at a

how do they go beat mainstreet lawyers? how do they help people who need legal services? pointed to three potential sources of problems where maybe we lawyers should look internally. rather than blame others for the problem. there is plenty of blame to go around, i am not a big blame guy, but i am a look inside guide. what do i see in our profession? there are three things i pointed to in that article. first, our own ethical rules. it's a very unusual profession where we are allowed to regulate ourselves. it's quite an insured near a privilege. it is the legislature, but lawyers basically regulate themselves. and do all of our ethical rules necessarily help our clients or do some of them help us more than they help our clients? i point to some that, for instance, regarding the unauthorized practice of law. why is it that you have to be a lawyer to help parents with disabled children and administered of proceedings to seek relief under idea? that is an example i pointed to. why is it that every time certain companies that provide online legal services for basic things get

the committee and seven pages of written answers about his personal record and has demonstrated a mainstreetl record with nearly all of his decisions being joined b. without clear reason, they have fudged the facts on recent history, tried to mislead american people about their unprecedented obstructionism claiming an nonexistence to steve about standard. as i've said before, should senate minority leader chuck schumer get his way, this would be the first successful filibuster of a nominee to join the supreme court. this would make history in a very bad way. they have also forgotten their own words. i cited previously this week the rhetoric of senator schumer, democratic nominee hillary clinton, the regrets of invoking the filibuster by president obama than it senator obama and the rights of any other senate democrats like claire mccaskill on why blocking a vote for a judge having gone through the process has no precedent in it is irresponsible. let me cite one other argument many democrats have made. current numbers seem to reject the notion of a supreme court operating with a judges instea

on mainstreet economics and liberals on, quote, sex trafficking, poverty, aids and la ick,en quote, rod rites, quote, there is one cause that should receive all the attention oar to the dock christians have left, religious liberty. end quote. i agree with rod that religious liberty is if of utmost importance and i include i as one of two issue folks news final chain at the of my recent book. worked on these issues intense live but i want to quickly raise two issues with such an exclusive focus. the first is that surely christians political area of concern can extend beyond religious freedom. certainly there are some constructive guidance in the benedict option particularly when it comes to sexual ethics and life and investing in institutions for clip formation will go longer air than political efforts that promises to overturn -- but this month, a budget was just released that would cut the social safety net and cuts meals on wheels busts increases military spending the congressional budget office says the current health plan proposed by congress and administration could force 24 millio

what it tells us is that it's finally time for mainstreet to really gero now were looking at the a gainking of the strong stock market. it's good to go public in tomorrow. what they're saying about the highly anticipated debut. [music] one nation under god. it's america. [music] your insurance company won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. welcome back. the long-awaited ipo almost here. come because of public tomorrow. she is taking a look at the company. that morning to you. >> good morning. from the west coast. a lot of news breaking overnight with this ipo. the pricing is gonna be somewhere between 17 and $18

mine are predominantly middle-class and working-class folks, small businesses, family farmers, mainstreet american this. obamacare regulations are crushing rural hospitals, 600 on the brink of going out of business. how are our farmers and ranchers going to feed the american people in that scenario. i see it is out of time. >> the gentlemen's time is expired. proposal of the motion for one minute to close. >> the republican-led congressional budget office estimated the first year loss of those with health insurance is 14 million. the white house score they won't share with you is 17 million. in this debate when you reduce it to its reducible essence you are either with insurance companies that are making record profits and will make even more under your bilor you are with the american people that simply want to pay premiums throughout their lives but when they need healthcare for them and their families they want to ensure it is there, without deductibles, without surcharges, without the added costs. we have an opportunity to work together to develop a plan that works for the american peo