hablemos ahora de maite perroni. yo no pongo atenciÓn en eso. cada de no sabe cuÁl es su situaciÓn personal. hablando de eso tema creo que es muy delicado. me voy a ir. >> se acerca el dÍa internacional de la mujer. en algÚn momento te sentiste discriminada como mujer? todos a veces hemos pasado por alguna situaciÓn que te dicen por ser viejas, por ser esto. maite: sÍ, han habido situaciones que de pronto por nuestro gÉnero las condiciones se hacen juicios o seÑalamientos. recuerdo cuando empezaba mi carrera hace muchos aÑos... cuando estaba en negociaciÓn, en proyecto tratando de lograr una mejor situaciÓn me decÍan no es gris y ademÁs de todo se va a casar, tener hijos y ya. no va a ser nada. 20 aÑos despuÉs aquÍ estamos como una carrera. claro que si anÉcdotas asÍ como chiquita tambiÉn hubo otras situaciones. importante el valor que tengas contigo misma, salir adelante y buscar tus objetivos, tus sueÑos y trabajar. el tiempo pone todo en su lugar. >> el niÑo? maite: niÑo o niÑa. no importa. es una bendiciÓn. lo qu

the comments of �* gwyn as = -: 77 7 77i7n7th7e7dail7y 7 in the daily mail7and reported in the daily maitail on sunday. to the chief whip. he had that meeting this becauses because he has 777 77beca7l7is7e777h7e 752275217 7 77beca7l71s7e777h7e 75227521 152 777 77beca7l71s7e777h7e £77536]; 777 77beca7l71s7e777h7e $427.75? 7tht77he ygtgjpgspspendedas we thopght he but he ygpjpgpspehded'as we thopght he but he has also would but he has also been from labour party suspended from labour party membership as has andrew gwyn. party sayin- e result of the investigation a. result. oftheainvestigation. this group which into this whatsapp group which included councillors and ex councillors as well. it looks it may be more difficult like it may be more difficult for him to find his way back in to the party given that his membership at this has few?" ; ii 77t7héy *5*:5** 5 55 555155153), 7777 7 77 77t7h7ey7s7a7y they been suspended. they say they are acting swiftly. early y 7:22 day (was ta{king day vaas taking ti; day vaas taking t; the 7 party 7 7 party about 7 7 party about whether 5 party about whe

we sent a lot of e-maits — could do. we sent a lot of e-mails all _ could do.r who told us that there might be a trial that there might be atrial up that there might be a trial up mark but they were sure, so met with in moorefields, gyarygody in moorefields. aboutjuly, they us he aaj�*d abaat u assist the , , ~ ,. ,,, ~ us he needs to be done tell us he needs to be done before his fourth birthday, but thenit before his fourth birthday, but then it was on august time they told us it should be going on-call you on-callyou made, consequential on—call you made, and daniel, i know that, and'lianiel, i know that. we have spoken today obviously we have spoken today and our viewers have learned with his children can onl how with his children can only see likeness — a lightness or darkness, not really sha ptes shapes and so distinguishing shapes and so on, i know from reading the distinguishing shapes and so on, i knov franklin, ding the distinguishing shapes and so on, i knov franklin, he; the distinguishing shapes and so on, i knov franklin, he was: background to fran

you are saying the statements the fifth circuit maits opinion regarding what it's holding was have to be read in before it?he arguments that were ms. pettit: i believe that is what they are referring to when they say that the actions you are talking about are relevant. judge jackson: what is a judge higginbotham saying when he says "i write separatelxpress my concern with the circuit moment of threat doctrine" but does not define it the way you have. he says the doctrine counters at the supreme court instructions to look totality of the circumstances. ms. pettit: i would point you to pageof his opinion where he says that in our reasonableness analysis, considering the totality of circumstances is merely performative. the dispute appears to be not the formulation of the r i articulated it, but its application. justice jackson: he said it is performative if the moment of threat is the sole determining factor in theionableness analysis. he says e a moment of the threat doctrine that tells us we only look at this moment. atakes any references to totality merely performative, because we ar