and this was once our situation, yes, malanyuk, a combatant, daragan, lost military competitions, allf them were actually very many in the 20s, because they fought first for the unr, and then many went there to sovietansk. the red army also fought like this, he was generally a rebel against everyone, including dovzhenko, and yanovsky, and mykola kulish, and even ostap vyshnya was in charge of the medical service of the ukrainian people's republic, that is , they all fought, but then so that they did not write about the war , they did not want this heroics, they would simply feel, they had suffered a certain defeat, especially like malanyuk, and there is also a third type, such... we now understand that it is all imbued with falsehood, in us everyone who fights it understands very well why he does it, we are not in a war of conquest, and on the other hand, we will not be defeated this time, i think we are all united in this realization and ... that's why it there will be some other literature, new literature, i think, that’s why it’s very different, and here to generalize how it will a

the other is a war through the eyes of a victim after a loss, and this was once our situation, yes malanyukcombatant, daragan, losers... military competitions, all of them are actually very many in the 20s, because they first fought for the ukrainian people's republic, and then many of them joined the soviet red army there the army, that's how the wave also fought, he was generally a rebel against everyone at first, that is , dovzhenko, and yanovsky, and mykola kulish, and even ostap vyshnya was in charge of the medical service of the ukrainian people's republic, that is, they all fought. but then, so that they don’t write about the war, they don’t want this heroism, they will just feel, they have suffered a certain defeat, especially like malaniuk, well , there is also a third type, such ideological works, like, say, honchar’s standard-bearers, where it victorious works, but we now understand that it is all steeped in falsehood, we have everyone who fights very well understands why he does it. we do not have a war of conquest, but on the other hand , we will not be defeated this time, i th

did not want this heroism, they simply felt, they underwent a certain defeats, especially such as malanyuk, well, there is also a third type, such ideological works, as there, say, honchar's standard-bearers, where these are victorious works, but we now understand that this is all a complete lie. in us, everyone who fights understands very well why he does it, we do not have a war of conquest, and on the other hand, we will not be defeated this time, i think we are all united in this realization, and therefore it will be some other literature, new literature, i think, that’s why it’s very different, and here for... how it will be published, well, it’s quite risky, not difficult, thank you, i can’t help but ask about reading as such, so we wrote and now we will show the graphics from of the ukrainian book institute, which conducted such and such a sociological study, how does the reading of ukrainians change, to what extent do they read more or less during the war, and look how interesting it is that... the number of ukrainians who read increased from 2020, so to 23 year, from 8% in the 20t