detail: there is only one person working in the may 21 foundation, this is malyukova. question with an asterisk. thesis two: everyone works for free. we have an online solidarity marathon, journalists worked for free, videographers worked for free, people who worked on creating this whole idea worked for free. on may 21, the foundation spent almost 20 thousand euros on consultations and expenses during the implementation of the project, also from the amount raised. report to official register, it was supposed to... slip unnoticed by the public, it is impossible to wipe it out, the accountant was allegedly guilty, who mistakenly wrote down the amount somewhere in the wrong place, so they were justified, although is it possible to mistakenly write down the amount in the column that should be should not be in the report, the organizers of the marathon were accused of lying, the world of extremism panicked, independent-dependent, supposedly journalists were given the go-ahead, the problem must be solved, however you want, the numbers were compiled in controlled media, they

so, the accounts of the malyukova foundation receive all the money that can be collected during the 2 as the cabinet officials say: then the transfer of funds from one little money-box to another begins. v in certain proportions, which will be established by the supervisory board, which will be created from media representatives implementing this marathon, the funds collected as part of this collection will be distributed. a certain number of already existing funds have been determined, from a fund of 20. on may 1, in different amounts, half a million euros are divided into seven parts, some of the funds got 9,500, others 13.5, 40, and leonchik’s linken media was lucky with 225. euros. already these funds were allegedly supposed to distribute half a million between the so-called political prisoners. transparency of the event, just take my word for it. the report will not indicate names, what it will look like, so as not only to observe. advice, but also the people who sent money could look at it. here , donors, of course, will have to trust, and we, as professionals, will have to trus