manchester city _ again? my great passion in life, manchester city fc, _ again? fc, are - again? my great passion in life, manchester city fc, are playing | again? my great passion in life, - manchester city fc, are playing away at sporting lisbon, that's a prospect not next month, but 15 february. i actually pulled out of one holiday — quite frankly, a lot of other people, basically ijust couldn't be bothered with all the fuss and paperwork. i'm a technical dinosaur, i hate all that. he. fuss and paperwork. i'm a technical dinosaur, i hate allthat.— dinosaur, i hate all that. no, it's a dream. — dinosaur, i hate all that. no, it's a dream. i'm _ dinosaur, i hate all that. no, it's a dream, i'm not— dinosaur, i hate all that. no, it's a dream, i'm not actually - dinosaur, i hate all that. no, it'sl a dream, i'm not actually thought about_ a dream, i'm not actually thought about going away for the same reasons— about going away for the same reasons that i guessjohn has said. iwent— reasons that i guessjohn has said. i went to _ reasons that i guessjohn has said. i

year, these eight men took their case to the high court, all of them claiming damages against manchester city fcfootball earnings. they say the club was legally responsible for the harm they suffered because, in their view, the relationship between their coach and the club was one of a kin to appointment. the club denied that. during the seven week trial, barry bennell himself gave two days of evidence from prison in cambridgeshire, where he's serving a 34 year offence for sexual offences against children. the club's insurer said they needed to call him in as a witness because he was a relevant witness because he was a relevant witness — but that decision was described as callous. today, the judge ruled against the men, dismissing their cases. he said that, although they had proved that barry bennell had abused them, the claims were brought to late to result in a fair trial and it hadn't been shown that manchester do you wear vicariously or indirectly liable for barry bennell�*s acts of abuse. following thatjudgment, i spoke exclusively to one of the claimants — to protect their anonymity, their