i want to test drive it and since everyone claims that should be enough, if it isn't we include mandtir d.r. languages in our motions. the public hearing would be part of it. >> informational hearing. >> yes. >> i need clarification. how did you -- >> instead of a mandatory d.r. we go with commissioner ant nene's language, encourage -- antonini's language, encouraging -- >> commissioner antonini: maybe i can restate it. for approval of staff recommendation for the amendments to the upper market n.c.d. with the grandfather and that's already in there, the grandfathering projects that have been applied for and with the addition that existing project sponsors of projects grandfathered must work with the community and planning staff to ensure the project's conformity with the upper market guidelines and we would have to have an informational public hearing on these projects when they reach that point. >> that's correct. and plus we need to strike out that it must be a code conforming -- >> right. that's sort of -- i would understand that's part of -- that is struck because the projects will be