you're great for mankind, but what happens to you, tim when you put that football helmet on. you change, or you are a different person? >> i just love playing football. i love playing sports. i'm competitive. i have a will to win. i have a will to win for me teammates and my coaches and the people supporting me, for my name. within more than that, he refuse to lose. that's something i don't want to accept. i can't handle and i don't like being around and it's something i never want to be around or known as is a loser. >> notre dame had four come from behind wins this year, and really, you brought them from behind, i think, every game. you had some of the most exciting game i have ever seen, but your ability to perform at crunch time, what does that shea about jimmy claussen. >> that's what i live for. i want the ball in my hands, when it's in that crunch time. at the end of the game, last play of the game, you know, purdue, fourth and five on the five yardline to win the game or lose the game, i want the ball in my hands. >> here's the ballgame, claussen to the end stone, tou

on behalf of all of planet earth and all of mankind, i say we have this vision. it's a vision for a world without nuclear weapons, a vision, i say often, without a strategy is a hallucination. believe me, friends and colleagues, we know we are not hallucinating. this is possible. this strategy is very clear. and we ask you to join us. and we will win this. some would say, well, for the gipper, back to ronald reagan. remember? i would say, we'll win it for all of mankind forever. thank you very much. >> thank you. now to talk specifically and briefly so can you get a chance to ask some questions, i'm going to turn to jeff who in turn will introduce lawrence bender. jeff? >> thank you very much. good morning, everybody. thank you for coming. on behalf of participate media, i'm delighted to say a few words about our new film "countdown to zero." as a bit of a background, i started participate in 2004 to be a media company focused on social change in the biggest issues in the world. and since that time we have released 23 films that have been nominated for 17 academy

. >> i agree fully with human exceptionalism but my rational basis for that is mankind created in the image of god. are there people who hold to human exceptionalism but reject the mankind made in the image of god and give some other rationale? >> yeah. in fact, i spend maybe a page and a half in my book on religion because religion would generally -- christian view made in the likeness and image of god.ò buddhists don't take that view. but i don't think that they believe that animals have rights. they do believe we have duties towards animals. and they get into karma. but i think there's a wholly rational basis for human exceptionalism. our rationality and our abstract thinking and so forth. but for me it really boils down to we're moral agents. whether that happened because of neo-darwinisic, accidental coming together of this remarkable species through no purpose or intelligent design as some in this room would suggest. or creation, there's no question that we are moral beings. there is no human society on the face of the earth that does not have a morality. i don't think there are

the common conviction that we need to eliminate nuclear weapons, that they are a surge of mankind. >> host: and what about yeltsin? >> guest: healton -- you know, yeltsin was a much more elemental figure, and i think you begin to put the destruction of the soviet union ahead of these other issues. and i think that yeltsin would have gone along for the abolition of nuclear weapons if the united states hadn't moved with issues such as the nato expansion, the bombing of serbia, actions which seem to leave russia out of it and i think those were big geopolitical mistakes and need the clinton administration and they were not corrected in the second bush administration. >> "after words" and several other c-span programs are available for podcast. more with jack matlock and dimitri simes in a moment.

the common conviction that we need to e eliminate nuclear weapons the they are a surge of mankind. >> host: and what about yeltsin? >> guest: yeltsin was a much more elemental figure, and i think he began to put the destruction of the soviet union ahead of these other issues and i think that yeltsin would have on also along for the abolition of nuclear weapons if the united states hadn't moved with issues such as the nato expansion, the bombing of serbia, actions which seem to leavesi

marries one them has done an act of christian charity, which entitles him to the kindly applause of all mankind. the brothers finally arrived in carson city, nevada, which was near the epicenter of the come stock leg, which was the biggest silver strike in american history. while orion went to work for the government, twain, deciding he had nothing better to do, thought he might as well become a millionaire. he thought that silver mining involved more or less his walking out and that the silver would be near on the walks, you just walk over and pick it up. he found out that it was actually a lot of hard work digging and blasting, and that was not something he was cut out to do. i decided it would be better for other people to do the hard work and he would sell the stock. he estimated he had become a millionaire for about 10 days before he neglected to do enough work on his own claim to establish legal ownership of it. his luck finally changed when he was offered a job as a newspaper reporter on the virginia city territorial enterprise. virginia city was the next town up from carson city. eureka

the law is very clear, the law of mankind thou shall not bear false witness.ernment is trying to make them bear false witness. >> what is interesting without getting into details and astutely avoiding it. the way it was done. the first few came out against it we have the charge, a charge by the way many of them had telegraphed last july, as a matter of fact. there was hell to pay. oh, really? why don't you come on and chat about it. what do you make of that intimidation. >> without a doubt it's intimidation and does two things. first of all, you bully the businesses, but you try to paint them in a negative light. already to me the biggest culprit we're going to find out as the hearings go on is notion of profits. friday when president obama was talking about the health care bill he said some companies are generous enough to pay for it so i agree with everything that's been said, this is absolutely amazing and it's complete bullying and i think right now the democrats believe this is a great, the best part of their play book, let's go with it we've bullied ever

this was the single greatest opportunity to bet on prices falling in the history of mankind. >> all these guys are sitting there hoping or wishing or betting that the whole thing is going to collapse, and they won big? >> there are very mixed feelings about it. one of them goes to the s.e.c. and tries to get them to take action. all of them are screaming to high heaven that this is insane. they were torn up about it. eisman said when it all works out, you feel like noah. >> how much did he make? >> i don't know, $50 million or $100 million. for their inanniversaries, $700 million. >> greg litton, do you know how much he made? >> i was told he was paid a bonus of about $50 million at the end of 2007. so they got rich. aeisman was sincere, you fell like noah. yeah, you built the arc and you are going to survive, but at the moment the flood starts and you are on the arc, it is not a happy moment. it is a torn-up moment. >> we are out of time. why do do you this? you have 60 minutes and number one on the list. why are you running all over the country? >> because they tell me to. it is in my p

if the only way to save mankind from global warming is by that kind of centralized control, then i think we've got a hugely serious problem. now as i said, i leave out the debate because i'm not a scientist over the extent of global warming and the extent of man caused. because i think focusing simply on the solutions that are being proposed show they are untentable from the perfective of anybody that values individual liberty. yes, sir? >> stewart roy here. would you care to comment specifically on the law of the sea, better known as l.o.s.t., because i'm concerned that some of our military, especially navy, have come out in favor of that which seens counterintuitive. >> the military lawyers have favored the sea treaty for a long time. i think it's a mistake. i think the regime it creates over seabed and subseabed mining is a mistake. i think the authority and tribunal that have been created a mistake. that wasn't something that people really focused on during the reagan administration when president reagan proposed the law. we can see even in the early decisions of the tribunal that it

and this was the single greatest opportunity to bet on prices falling in the history of mankind. >> soteve eisman or michael burry all of these guys all of these guys are sitting there hoping or wishing or betting that the whole thing is going to collapse and they won big. >> well, there are very mixed feelings about it though. i mean one of them goes to the sec and tries to get them to take action. all of them are screaming to high heaven this is insane. they are torn up about it. eisman, himself, says, he says, "when it all works and they're making their money" he says "you feel like noah." >> how much does he have, do you know? >> how much did he make? >> yes. >> for himself, i don't know. fifty million, 100 million -- they made for their investors 700 or $800 million. >> what about burry, how much did he make. >> about the same. about the same. >> anybody else in that group that you wrote about, greg lippman, do you have any idea how much he made? >> you know i was told by someone in his firm that he was paid a bonus of about $50 million at the end of '07. so the got rich. but eism

. -- tantamount to killing all of mankind. it was what president kennedy called the risk of accidents, miscalculation and madness, and the potential for continuing and expanding irrational arms races in regions like the middle east, especially now when increasingly, poor populations are facing the consequences of global warming. we are at a nuclear tipping point, beyond which there may be in no turning back and we are witnessing the greatest opportunity in decades to mobilize what international polling has shown is majority support in nuclear and non- nuclear states for zero. if governments do not act now to begin to a limit of nuclear- weapons, we will likely witness in our lifetime the destructive use of nuclear technology by a country or by terrorist groups. for governments to act, global zero needs to become recognized for what it is, and urgent global imperative. it needs to be recognized by the constituencies of all our governments as that -- requiring everyone to get involved. post-cold war generations are largely unawa

a simple philosophy it took mankind until the late 18th century to figure out and the washington and adams and hamilton franklin and a supporting cast behind them to make it work. so simple we seem to have forgotten it all but as a glance back on what mr. coolidge articulating realize not only could he clearly ski -- to see what the founders devised but the broader human condition and could see far ahead in to the future where his verities would quickly be discarded and disdain. in january 1914 assuming control with the office of the presidency he told his legislators the normal must care for themselves. a normal must care for themselves. he says if you are a reasonable he menu should close and feed and shelter yourself and be able to make decisions about your own property your future and your children and your own money about choices and options. adults can take care of themselves but note that -- notice the subtext what about those that are not quote of a quote normal? they cannot adequately fend for themselves here is the concept of the service wants again. must assist them prefer

a philosophy so simple it took mankind until the late 18th-century to figure out, and it took the leadership of a washington and adams, jefferson and madison, hamilton, franklin and pretty good supporting cast behind them to make a work. so simple that we seem to have forgotten it all. but as we glance back on what mr. coolidge articulate on such matters we realize not only could he clearly see what the founders devised, he could see the broader human condition and he could see far ahead into the future it's a world where all varieties, his verities were quickly being discarded and disband. let's take one example, and in january 1914 on assuming control of the office of the presidency of the massachusetts state senate, he told his fellow legislators the normal must care for themselves. the normal must care for themselves. what is he saying? he is saying that if you are a reasonable human, you should be able to clothe and feed and shelter yourself. you should be able to make decisions about your own property, about your future, about your children, about your own money, about choices and opti

this work advances the security of united states and all mankind. this prevents nuclear proliferation and terrorism and that will remain one of my highest priorities as president of the united states. with that, i will take a few questions. >> it was stated that all of the unprecedented cooperation will be done under a voluntary basis, not a binding commitment what is the likelihood that countries that have been at odds over these issues for a number of years will cooperate? how can this be enforced? >> lipstick is this of example. for about 10 years, we have been encouraging ukraine to either ship out its highly enriched uranium or transformi it to a lower enriched uranium. because of this conference, in part, ukraine took that step. they announced they would complete this step over the next couple of years. all the commitments we talked about are ones that we have already booked even before communique has taken place. there is strong unanimity about the importance of this issue as a threat to the global and international community. we also have a

bill: he once said that is one small step for mankind -- one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind and neil armstrong has something to day to president obama about the future of the space program. that's next. @u÷ >> three significant headlines now out of the hearing already with eric holder, opening statement there and now the questions have begun. with regard to usama bin laden, the previous statement he said, he would not be and toured alive and here's what -- captured alive and here's what holder is saying, with regard to ubl, a target for us, the plan he says is to capture or kill him and the hope to be to capture and with regard to what i said earlier that was an assessment of the likelihood he'd be able to be captured alive and concluded by saying our goal is to either capture ubl or kill him in a reference to usama bin laden. and with regard to khalid sheikh mohammed, he is saying now, that no final decision has been made about the forum in which he'd be tried, whether gitmo or a military brig, civilian trial and the possibility of it being held at trial in new yor

>> well, the good news is the catholic community is a fourth of mankind. 160 countries.ad news is when an allegation or an accusation about american misconduct occurred and occurs, i think the attitude of the has been those are those oversexed americans. they need to solve their problems. the catholic bishops when they asked me to claire that panel set zero tolerance, criminal referral and transparency, that's what we did as a board. as a result the incidents of abuse are very low now in the united states. i think we've done the right thing. but these individuals who had touched children are criminals. they ought to go to jail. they ought to be stripped of their ministry, their priesthood. that became the attitude of my board. i really feel for the pope because he is the spiritual leader of the church, but that means he's got to make sure the kids are safe. and he's got a real trial under way because this is not helping the church, but it's important, obviously, that we on behalf of the catholic and the faith community everywhere that we win this battle and not have thes

. >>> terrorists and how to keep the most lethal weapons known to m mankind from getting into the hands of those who would use them. will a enthusiastic leer summit get it done? retired u.s. general barry mccaffrey, right here. hey, i'm jennifer hudson and i'm winning. winning at losing on weight watchers. i have never been this size in my adult life. so it's a special place for me. i'm so comfortable in my jeans. i love the progress. looking back and saying, "wow, look at the difference." and it makes me love myself that much more. i win. and you can, too. ♪ win, win, i win ♪ i win and you can join for free. weight watchers. because it works. >>> tiger woods going for the masters championship as he heads into the final round today at augusta national. and kerry sanders still at his post there with the very latest. kerry, with a good morning, what is he closer to a fifth green jacket today as you see it or not? >> reporter: he is but the fans are going to wonder if they're going to get in to see him or not because here in the legendary masters, in the gentile south where nothing ever go

the common conviction that we need to a limit nuclear weapons that they are a scourge of mankind. >>ost: and what about yeltsin? >> guest: yeltsin, you know, yeltsin was a much more elemental figure, and i think that he began to put the distraction of the soviet union ahead of these other issues. and i think that yeltsin would have gone also along on for the abolition of nuclear weapons if the united states had not moved with issues such as the nato expansion, the bombing of serbia, actions which seem to leave russia out of it. and i think that those were big geopolitical mistakes made by the clinton administration, and they were not corrected by the second bush administration. >> "after words" and several other c-span programs are available for download as podcast. more with jack matlock and dimitri simes in a moment. >> "after words" with jack matlock and dimitri simes continues. >> host: this clearly was a turning point in the here's relationship with russia, two very different of what was happening in the balkans, the clinton administration sought primary in terms of second aggre

>> there is a wonderful passage -- >> on mankind and he gave his savior for one and for all. >> he changedts chapter 10, to answer your question, larry, on shellfish. and cornelius has this amazing enlightenment as peter has this vision of the lord saying eat whatever you want. >> larry: peter may have been hungry. no pun intended. >> there is this grace that comes upon all of us no longer to live by the law of the old testament but when you get to the issue of homosexuality, he doesn't change his mind on that. it flows over into the new testament and it as powerfully in as it was in the old testament. >> larry: peter gets a vision about shellfish. what if ted gets a vision about homosexuality that says since it's not a choice and as long as a person is observant and good, it is no longer a sin. you will not believe ted? >> god didn't use ted to write the scriptures. and the scriptures that have been written are the scriptures i go by. >> larry: nothing is being written today? >> absolutely not. >> larry: done. >> in the book of revelation, we're told there is a blessing upon those that ke

." >> it is perhaps the most fascinating piece of fabric in the history of mankind.so much attention paid to it. i'm fascinated by it. is it actually the burial cloth of jesus? and there's still so much debate about that. now some people are getting a firsthand look. >> you'll hear much more about that story coming up. good morning and thanks for being with us on this monday. i'm vinita nair. >> i'm jeremy hubbard. >>> dozens of world leaders are in washington for talks on securing nuclear stockpiles. >> a terror group could get its hands on a nuclear weapon. president obama says it will change worldwide security for years to come. here's rachel martin. >> reporter: they have come from as far away as jordan and malaysia. invited by president obama to grapple with one enormous question. how to prevent a devastating nuclear attack. >> the single biggest threat to u.s. security, short-term, medium-term and long-term, would be the possibility of a terrorist organization obtaining a nuclear weapon. >> reporter: it's a threat described by the country's most famous cold war

it's what happens when mankind abuses the habitat in which he was born. a half century ago an american statesman addressed this very issue, quote, we travel together, passengers on a little space ship dependent on its reserves of air and soil, all committed for our safety to its security and peace, preserved from annihilation only by the care, the work, and i will say, the love we give our fragile craft. that was adlai stevenson speaking in geneva a week before he died 45 years ago. is our country doing what it can to avoid the desperate future we see in "avatar?" are we dealing with resource exhaustion? are we people the other people of the world can look to for earthly salvation? second, immigration. how are we doing with the desperate people who want to come here and work here? are we dealing with them in a just and fair manner using honest rule of law or exploiting the recent most desperate arrivals to gain the cheapest possible source of labor? one, lead the world in dealing with the real prospect of climate change and get serious about renewable ene

simply made up everything about some primitive state of mankind which everybody was delightfully happy and depicted our subsequent evolution as one of becoming corrupted by the influences of property ownership and civilization. millions of kids are still taught this stuff every year. even though there is not an empirical fact and a lot of it. whenever people have been free to get out of the country and come to the cities, they have done so and now worldwide more than have that freedom, they are doing so. the result is the birth rate goes down because people have a lot of kids when they are in the country because they need the farm help. they move to cities in cramped quarters and have fewer children. we have all seen pictures like this of slums. they are usually used to depict the disparity of income which is wrongly thought to be growing worldwide. it is not. it is about the same or decreasing and certainly growing in the united states right now which i consider to be an unhealthy situation but worldwide it is not. we see these sorts of photos but you could have taken a photo like thi

the fact is throughout history most of mankind has understood force. those lucky few who are fortunate enough to be able to live their political lives free of the fear of violence are largely concentrated on the capitals of contemporary western europe and along the east and west coast of the united states. the inhabitants of the arabic-speaking if they are not so fortunate. to say lebanon is held at gunpoint or syrian intellectuals have typically thrown in prison and tortured, the regional minorities like the shia, druze, alawite, christians kurds in jewish have often been the target of purges and political violence in the name of arab nationalism. the corporatist ideology that seeks to raise communal as well as individual difference is not to say that arabs only understand force but that violence is a central factor in arab political life and it is impossible to understand the region without taking this into account. one more thing about the book's title. the strong horse not only punishes his enemies, he also rewards and protect his friends. sometime

>> there's one other company i'm concerned about, mankind. it's sort of in this whole space. >> sought space you're talking about is what a lot of people call diabesity because obesity and diabetes are so interconnect a some people call it diabesity. they have this inhaleable product about the size of your finger. it just got a delay from the fda. skeptics are saying it's dead in the water, defenders are saying no, al mann, the guy who the company is named for, mann kind, he's got a solid track record in the business, if anybody can get this done he can get it done. >> mike, thanks so much for joining us. we appreciate your analysis. we were talk about a lost these binary event type stocks, very volatile but if the volatility is too risky for you you can play the index, which is the the ibb. one share of the etf 92 bucks. solution, options. we bring in mike khouw, who is u.s. director of cantor's equities derivatives business, of course also an "options action" contributor. mike, what's the trade here? >> what we're taking a look at is the se

whatever this tool is the hand of man is produced depends entirely on the nature of life in this mankindi believe that the most enlightened of all the political men of our time, we should strive to do things in his spirit, not to use violence and tragic for our cause, but i nonparticipation been anything you believe is evil. >> welcome, thank you for coming. >> who was that? >> it was all read einstein. thank you for coming and welcome to her city. and speaking of faith, you all cannot say. we'll have you home in time [inaudible] we live in both worlds. happy easter to you. was that happy? >> guest: it was. i was actually getting ready to travel here, so it's a little bit of business and pleasure. >> host: you know, the timing of our conversation is interesting because this is the data follows holy rican passover. mr. orthodox and protestant easter are on the same sunday which is most than usual. and i wondered after alter meditation about time and space, do you think that is a coincidence? do you think there is some spiritual meaning to this or the buddha just happen to be the day after

and he wrote in his, to what we summon mankind, that could lure and king fahd were also models for thebrotherhood. you've written about his life in your book which i've read, but you haven't written about these things. you have not gone into the detail that paul berman exhaustively goes into in this book. and it makes me ask, is there a limit to what you are willing to say or even to think? is there red line, which is your lineage, your heritage? i'm not attributing these to you and i'm not asking you to repudiate your grandfather. i'm asking you why you haven't condemned him for his association with the grand mufti and they are just ancient history because one of your grandfather's followers, who says all her dowry who preaches rencontre egyptian born, just last year said hitler was sent by allah as a punishment for the correction of the jews. i don't know if you condemned at the time. you've spoken quite highly of sheikh kothari, so my first question is to you condemned these things? or is there a limit to the breadth of your ethical vision? let me ask the second question and then we

know that as i analyzed the history of not just the u.s., but all nations throughout the history of mankindthey believed was the greater good. and -- and it's accepted. sometimes killing is accepted. >> in these recordings, timothy mcveigh clearly comes across as a sociopath, by no means normal and well adjusted. it's important to note he didn't see himself as a lone wolf. he saw himself as part of a movement, guns-based patriot movement that was important to him. >> it's chilling to hear his voice describe these events. this movement you talked about, there were arrests recently in michigan, militia members plotting anti-government activities. do we know, have any idea how widespread this movement is right now? >> it's hard to quantify. when you talk to law enforcement sources i spoke with homeland security secretary janet napolitano about this on my show. it seems there's a resurgence of those. >> fueled by what? >> economic dislocation. that doesn't get enough credit as a cause. also by alienation from the government, feel that the government is on the other side, not on your side. and t

was six years old he watched neil armstrong go up there, one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. that inspired him to become a rocket scientist. let me finish the question and then you can respond. he and others, including jim lovell and neil armstrong came out and said the president's move is hurting that. he is all but eliminating that inspiration for little boys and girls. your response. >> no. absolutely not. when you look at it, i grew up during the apollo era again. i wanted to go into space and i would have loved to gone into the moon when i was in the space program. however this program does not stop human expansion into space. we have to understand, that kids, not every kid who is interested in space exploration wants to be an astronaut on a vehicle. that inspiration comes from many different places. this program continues human expansion. say one of the things we want to tie in this whole idea, as you see, there is continuous commitment to space exploration, which includes an optimal balance between robotic missions and humans on missions. megyn: how are we going to ge

we shall require a new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive. that truth endures today. sake of our common security, for the sake of our survival, we cannot drift. we need a new manner of thinking and action and that is the challenge before us, and i thank all of you for being here to confront that challenge together in partnership. and with that, i'm going to ask that we take a few moments to allow the press to exit before our first session. >> we hate it when that happens, when the press has to exit, that's why we'll bring suzanne malveaux at the white house back in and also sharon squasoni, our expert on nuclear weapons and the threat thereof. suzanne, maybe we should go ahead and explain to our viewers why it operates this way. like what we saw there. it went to bars. we get to see who's there and we get to see the mingling and it's satellite off. >> closed to the press. >> right. right. >> we'll have a working lunch and we'll probably get a couple of pictures of that in the next session and the president later this afternoon will be holding a press conference and he

this has been the most telegraphed move in mankind. the chinese made it clear they intend to have the currency appreciate, much more slowly than american politicians want. this is good timing given that the treasury department will be a currency manipulator. >> what makes money on this. is it broadly irrelevant? >> this is about as broadly irrelevant to whether someone's going to profit in china. >> i would disagree, because if you look at what's going on, if they go to a crawling peg, what it signals is that china's becoming an easier place to invest. i'm not going to say it's an easy place to invest. but that's going to attract capital, which means u.s. dollars that have to be reinvested someplace which could hit the treasury market, which is why, again, i'm looking at the ten-year auction as fairly important. >> i was shocked to hear you're awaiting the central bank meetings. difficult to make money on those, isn't it? >> i think the concern is really with the ecb. look, the reality is this with greece. we've done a lot of smoke and

is the only way to save mankind from global warming is by that kind of centralized control, then i thinklem. now, as i say, i leave out the debate because i'm not a scientist over the extent of global warming and over the extent it's man caused because i think focusing simply on the solutions that are being proposed show that they are untenable from the perspective of anybody who values individual liberty. yes, sir? >> stuart reuter. would you care to comment specifically on the law of the sea better known as lost? because i'm concerned that some of our military, especially our navy have come out in favor of that, which seems contrary to it. >> the military lawyers have favored ratification of law of the sea treaty for a long time. i think the tree is a mistake. i think the regime it creates over seabed and sub seabed mining is a mistake. i think the authority creates a state or i think the tribunal that has been created is a mistake. that wasn't something that people really focused on during the reagan administration when president reagan opposed the law of the sea treaty, but we can se

. >> one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. >> reporter: it was a program borne of kmettionhe race to beat the soviets to the moon. >> achieving the goal before this decade is out of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. >> reporter: eight years later the world watched neil armstrong do just that. some this weekend in alabama created their own moon recover. >> we thought it was cool opportunity. >> reporter: the opportunity of space flight have from the beginning been frought with risk. >> a major malfunction. >> reporter: the loss of challenger and its seven crew members. the loss of seven more aboard columbia. then the disaster averted when heroism and a refusal to accept defeat resulted in what many remember as nasa's finest moments 40 years ago today. apoll l apollo 13 has been called nasa's most successful failure. >> they flipped switches and reset. this can't be. they don't want to believe this. their crew is 200,000 miles from the earth. >> reporter: as the world held their breath. they turned it into a lifeboat to power their way back to e

thank the lord ♪ thank the lord ♪ now there ain't no room ♪ for the hopeless sinner ♪ who hurt on mankindt ready ♪ you don't need no ticket ♪ no just get on board ♪ all you need is faith ♪ to see coming ♪ you don't need ticket, no ♪ if it's based on love ♪ you don't need no ticket, no, no ♪ ♪ you just thank the lord ♪ >>> crystal bowersox people get ready from the dramatic a cappella start to the orchestra and the crying at the end. you can tell crystal was definitely feeling inspired. >> that was inspirational. you know what, crystal, i'm in a strange way happy to sey you motionnalemotional because you e closed down a little bit. it felt like this song meant a lot to you. you sang it fantastically and for me it was in a completely different class to everything else we heard tonight. congratulations. >> she did a really good job. >> i thought it was nice. let us know what you thought about last night's show. you can post your reaction on facebook or twitter page. just log on to foxbaltimore.com or send us a tweet at fox baltimore. >>> you can follow candace dold on her idol blog as she ta

the koran declares killing an innocent person is at the amount to killing all of mankind. for me as a global citizen, that is come pounded by the growing threat of proliferation and nuclear terrorism today increasing the odds of what president kennedy called the risks of accidents, miscalculation and madness and the potential for continuing and expanding irrational arms races in regions like the middle east. especially now when increasingly populations, por loplations in these -- poor populations in these regions are facing consequences of global warming and severe economic downturn. we are at a nuclear tipping point beyond which there may be no turning back and we are witnessing the greatest opportunity in decades to mobilize what international polling has shown is majority support in nuclear and non-nuclear states for zero. if governments don't act now, our governments don't act now to begin to eliminate all nuclear weapons, we will likely witness in our lifetime, the destructive use of nuclear technology by a country or by terrorist groups. and for governments to act, g

[cheering] the i united states constitution sets up america as the only society in the history of mankind press on the idea that the only legitimate reason for government was to protect the individual civil liberties and rights of citizens. [cheering] it is impossible to be a racist, human rights advocate who anybody thinks the city its food and on the fringes what missiles lines have anything to do i have news for you, america is our country and we are taking it back to triet [cheering] all right. god, country, family. diana, please come up here and let's sing together the star spangled banner to officially kick off this rally. t party express let's put our hearts into it. [cheering] >> hello, d.c.. all join me in the song to honor our country. ♪ ♪ o, say can you see ♪ by the dawn's early light ♪ what so proudly we hailed ♪ at the twiglights last gleaming ♪ ♪ we brought stars and stripes through the perilous fight ♪ ♪ or the landpart we want ♪ was so gallantly streaming ♪ and the rockets red glare ♪ the boms bursting in air ♪ gave proof through the night ♪ that our flag was still there ♪

we shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive." that truth endures today. for the sake of our common security, for the sake of our survival, we cannot drift. we need a new matter and manner of thinking that. is the challenge before us, and i thank all of you for being here to confront that challenge together in partnership. with that, i would ask that we take a few moments to allow the press in. >> president obama earlier today. we hope to have a news conference at 4:30 eastern, the president considering a new nomination to the supreme court, and here are recent discussions from the supreme court historical society. it runs about an hour and 20 minutes. >> good evening. i'm ralph lancaster, the president of the supreme court historical society. before we begin tonight's program, those of you who are regulars will know i'm about to tell you to turn off your cell phones. turn off your pda's. turn off your blackberries. turn off whatever they call it and please don't just silence them or put them on vibrate because there's something a

our work today not only advances the security of the united states but all all mankind and preventingnuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism will remain one of my highest priorities as president of the united states. with that, i am going to take a few questions. i'm going to start with bill plante from cbs. >> the communique states in no uncertain terms that all of the unprecedented cooperation for which are calling will be done on a voluntary basis, not a binding commitment. what is the likelihood that countries which have been at odds over these issues for a number of years are now going to cooperate? how can this be enforced? >> let's take a specific example, bill. for about 10 years, we have been encouraging ukraine to either ship out its highly enriched uranium or transform to lower grade -- a lower enriched uranium. and in part because of this conference, ukraine took that step -- announced that it would complete this step over the next couple of years. so all the commitments that we talked about are ones that we have already booked, even before the communique and the work

[cheering] the i united states constitution sets up america as the only society in the history of mankind press on the idea that the only legitimate reason for government was to protect the individual civil liberties and rights of citizens. [cheering] it is impossible to be a racist, human rights advocate who anybody thinks the city its food and on the fringes what missiles lines have anything to do i have news for you, america is our country and we are taking it back to triet [cheering] all right. god, country, family. diana, please come up here and let's sing together the star spangled banner to officially kick off this rally. t party express let's put our hearts into it. [cheering] >> hello, d.c.. all join me in the song to honor our country. ♪ ♪ o, say can you see ♪ by the dawn's early light ♪ what so proudly we hailed ♪ at the twiglights last gleaming ♪ ♪ we brought stars and stripes through the perilous fight ♪ ♪ or the landpart we want ♪ was so gallantly streaming ♪ and the rockets red glare ♪ the boms bursting in air ♪ gave proof through the night ♪ that our flag was still there ♪

willie geist, a great man, greatest vice president in the history of mankind. >> and he personalizesthing. let's make it clear. >> he did crystallize that health care vote. >> he did. i think he summed it up nicely. i like the fact the president kept a stern face in front of the cameras and fell out laughing when they got in private. >> what else are you going to do? with us now, columnist for "the new york times" magazine, mark leibovich, his new article is the cover story for this week's issue "the man the white house wakes up to," he writes this about politico's mike allen. i'll read from it, if i can. you can spot him from far away, his shiny head darting up and often straight down into his blackberry. he says he gets 2,000 e-mail messages a day, tries to answer all that are addressed to him personally. some while walking. he's always bumping into things. >> mark leibovich, thanks for being back. bob woodward, every time he comes on this set, and he does it regularly, wants to talk about one person, mike allen. he says he is a force of nature in the future of journalism. >> he is

i work today the only advancing the security of the united states but the security of all of mankind and preventing nuclear proliferation of nuclear terrorism will remain one of my highest priorities as the president of the united states. with that i'm going to take a few questions. >> the communique states of the unprecedented cooperation for which your colleagues will be done on a voluntary basis of finding commitment. what is the likelihood countries that have been at odds over these issues a number of years are going to cooperate? >> what's take a specific example. from about ten years we've been encouraging ukraine to either ship out its highly enriched uranium or transfer men's and lower grade, lower enriched uranium and in part because of this conference. ukraine took the step and announced that it would complete the stepped over the next couple of years. so all of the commitments that we talked about our ones that we have already booked even before the community plan is put in place and i think there is actually strong unanimity about the importance of this issue as a threat

as leaders for human rights from all over the world, gather in memphis to pay tribute to mankind's enduring impulse for freedom. getting to hear these human right leaders has been a highlight of my life. but getting to hear my friend, ben each year was even more special. year after year, he reminded us that he was indeed a drum major for freedom. we honor him today with this celebration of his life. but we honor him tomorrow and the days ahead by remaining true to his principles. and to the fight for human ghts tt characterized his life. today he's been allowed to go to the mountain. and he's looking over us. and he's seen the promised land. more than that, he's now entered the promised land. and he has found a place where all of us are judged by the content of our character and not by the color of our skin. as ben so often said, we have made historic strides in our dream of equal rights. but the journey is not over. inspired by his example and his courage, we leave the celebration of his life today with renewed purpose to a dream that will never die. i love you ben. and i will miss you ver

adults, like members of the greatest deliberative body we are told over and over aga in the history of mankind, the united states senate to resolve these matters. i have worked for hours with my colleague from alabama, as he well knows, senator shelby, to the point that he has said -- and i commend him for it and i appreciate it very much, that we are 80% of the way to a bipartisan consensus. in fact, i suspect that if richard shelby were asked today whether that number was 80%, i suspect he would even have a higher number. imagine being between 80% and 90% in agreement and yet we're being told by the minority we can't go forward. do we have to write the whole bill? is that how we go forward? you have 80% or 90%, what you think is a good bill, but oh, no, we're going to stop any further debate. in all my years, i have never heard of such an argument, whether i have been in the minority or the majority, that i agree with 80% or 90% of what you have written, senator, but i'm sorry, we are going to have to stop even considering any further debate on the floor of the united states senate. i have w

like members of the greatest to the board of body we are told over and over again in the history of mankind the united states senate. to resolve these matters i44 hours of my colleagues and alabama as you know, senator shall become to the point he said and i commend him for and appreciate three much we are 80% of the way to a bipartisan consensus in fact i suspect that mr. shall be asked today that number was 80% i suspect even higher number. imagine being between 80 to 90% in agreement yet we are told by the minority we can't go forward don't you write the whole bill? is that when we go forward? 80 or 90% you think is a good bill but no we are going to stop any further debate. in all my years i've never heard of such an argument with the rise in the minority or the majority did i agree with 80 or 90% of what you have written, senator, but i'm sorry. we have to stop even considering any further debate on the floor of the united states samet. i worked many hours with a senator from tennessee, bob corker, to get to 100% as he well knows. matter what was said in the meetings between the republ

our work today not only advances the security of the united states, but all mankind. and preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism will remain one of my highest priorities as president of the united states. with that, i will take a few questions and i will start with bill from cbs. >> the communique states in no uncertain terms of cooperation will be done on a voluntary basis, not a binding commitment. what is the likelihood that countries that have been at odds over these issues for number of years are going to cooperate? how can this be enforced? >> let's just take a specific example. for about 10 years, we have been encouraging ukraine to leadership bowed its highly enriched uranium or transform it -- to either ship out its highly enriched uranium or transform it into a lower enriched uranium. in part because of this conference, ukraine to that step, announced that it would complete this step over the next couple of years. so, all the commitments that we have talked about are ones that we have already booked even before the communique and the work plan

civil leaders paid tribute to mankind's in during and calls for freedom. -- thin during the indoor inooks each year, was even more special. year after year, he reminded us that he was a drum major for freedom. we honor him today with this celebration of his life, but we honor him tomorrow, and the days ahead, by remaining true to his principles and to the fight for human rights that characterized his life. today, he has been allowed to go to the mountain, and he is looking over us and seen the promised land. more than that, he has now entered the promised land. he has found a place where all of us are judged by the content of our character, and not by the color of our skin. as ben, so often said, we have made a historic strides in our dream of equal rights, but the journey is not over. inspired by his example and his courage, we lead the celebration of his bridge we leave the light -- the celebration of his life with a renewed purpose. i love you, benjamin hooks, and i will miss you very, very much. [applause] >> good afternoon. i'm actua >> good afternoon, i am olivia morgan. i am ma

like members of the greatest deliberative body we are told over and over again in the history of mankind, the united states senate to resolve these matters. i have worked for hours with my colleague from alabama, as he well knows, senator shelby, to the point that he has said -- and i commend him for it and i appreciate it very much, that we are 80% of the way to a bipartisan consensus. in fact, i suspect that if richard shelby were asked today whether that number was 80%, i suspect he would even have a higher number. imagine being between 80% and 90% in agreement and yet we're being told by the minority we can't go forward. do we have to write the whole bill? is that how we go forward? you have 80% or 90%, what you think is a good bill, but oh, no, we're going to stop any further debate. in all my years, i have never heard of such an argument, whether i have been in the minority or the majority, that i agree with 80% or 90% of what you have written, senator, but i'm sorry, we are going to have to stop even considering any further debate on the floor of the united states senate. i have w

like members of the greatest deliberative body we are told over and over again in the history of mankind, the united states senate to resolve these matters. i have worked for hours with my colleague from alabama, as he well knows, senator shelby, to the point that he has said -- and i commend him for it and i appreciate it very much, that we are 80% of the way to a bipartisan consensus. in fact, i suspect that if richard shelby were asked today whether that number was 80%, i suspect he would even have a higher number. imagine being between 80% and 90% in agreement and yet we're being told by the minority we can't go forward. do we have to write the whole bill? is that how we go forward? you have 80% or 90%, what you think is a good bill, but oh, no, we're going to stop any further debate. in all my years, i have never heard of such an argument, whether i have been in the minority or the majority, that i agree with 80% or 90% of what you have written, senator, but i'm sorry, we are going to have to stop even considering any further debate on the floor of the united states senate. i have w

our work today not only advances the security of united states, it advances the security of all mankind and preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism will remain one of my highest priorities as president of the united states. so with that i'm going to take a few questions. i'm going to start with bill from cbs. >> the states under no uncertain terms that all cooperation will be done on a voluntary basis, not a binding commitment. what is the like lowhood countries that have been at odds over so many years will cooperate? how can this be enforced? >> well, let us take a specific example, bill. for about 10 years we have been encouraging ukraine to either ship out its highly enriched uranium or transform it to a lower grade -- a lower enriched uranium. and in part because of this conference ukraine took that step, announced it would complete the step over the next couple of years. so all the commitments that we talked about are ones that we've already booked even before the commoun kay and the work plan is in place. and i think that is strong unanimity about the importance of