carson was asked about his involvement with this company called manotech.id on the debate stage he had no involvement. he later said, it's absurd. it's propaganda. he said, i didn't have any relationship with them. there are some videos with dr. carson the people look at and seem a lot like ads to people. how do you square those things, the presence of the videos and his claim he had no involvement with the company? barry: this is a perfect example. if anyone bothered to call manotech, they would've said, there was no involvement, no contractual obligation. he gave a couple paid speeches, which is what he did the last four or five years, and he got a speaking fee. he spoke to all kinds of groups. it's ridiculous. he takes a vitamin that comes from manotech. he thinks it makes them healthier. good for him. he doesn't run the company. he doesn't make any of the false advertising claims they have. john: i take your point that there was no contractual relationship, and i take your point he didn't run the company, but you are saying he is unaware that videos of