was stopping his growth, mao was stopping his people with his madness. own people with his madness.he second thing we did accelerated as the is accelerated as the of south korea, development of south korea, taiwan, indonesia, taiwan, thailand, indonesia, bangladesh. some of countries are not those countries are not national powers. usaid advanced national powers. usaid advanced national powers. usaid a huge amount of money those two countries. it was in those two countries. it was a great success. i think we should be proud of it. we re were donald trump 7 of usaid, what be 7 be to be 7 to donald would say put a trump? i wouldsayputa - administfifi trump? lwouldsayputa - administrator who trump? i wouldssaypug. - - administrator who can chan-e change without manage change—without this and without the option and without'ths people, without morgljsing people, without them names. we penalise calling them names. we penalise the of murdered service of the united in the service of the united states in the field during the cold war and on the attacks. we have terrorist attacks. we have plaqu

chairman mao, the cultural revolution in the great leap forward, attacking the faults of old customs, old culture, old habits and, old ideas, tens of millions of chinese perished along the way in the soviet union. they rewrote their history so often. it became a standing joke. they said the only thing that certain is the future. it's the past that keeps on changing. so history matters because it largely defines our culture. it tells us who we are, where we came, how we got here, and more importantly, what were the what were the beliefs, the values that inspired and and sustained ancestors on their journeys? because it's those values, that same values today that inspire and guide us on our own journeys into the future. so when the radicals erase history really trying to erase and cancel our values, particularly religious values. that's why george orwell said who controls the past, controls the future, and america's past is and greatly diminished without robert e lee, because lee was the greatest example of, noble character and virtue in american history. he was the perfect balance of t

he's signed three this so far, the three players this month so far, the biggest name being omar mao mushika they've also been linked with a move for gonzales, �*a a move for nico gonzales, for a deal worth around £60 million. could worth around £60 million. that could be biggest deal completed. but be the biggest deal completed. but until the deadline, be 33 lhey they can 7 77 they can to 7 77 they can to bring 77 they can to bring7ina 77 they can to bring 7in a forward. :—= for us. to aston villa, who'll cover at least 75% of his reported £300,000—a—week salary, and have the option to make the deal commentator: rashford! they felt inseparable — a bond built by a lifetime. longer his workplace. i'm gutted. i want him to stay. he's trying hard enough. immediate sensation. commentator: rashford round steele! that feeling never...never leaves your life. you're always a red. his mural in manchester was defaced, then repaired and adorned with support. at united, rashford watched a succession of managers come and go. on the bench than rashford. i will put vital before i put the player that, um, l

mao, a president to leader of china. china was in the 1960's was only 10 years or so removed from its own revolution becoming a communist country. he thought it deserved to be the leader. they were in constant ideological conflict, splitting the communist world apart. if you went back into history, several hundred years there is one example after another of russia and china not in a cozy relationship, far from it. but in a very antagonistic relationship, it is something we ought to keep our eye on when we think today about who are russia's key allies. russia today as china and north korea, as iran and those for regard themselves as an access of resistance against what, against the united states. i believe definitely they are not going to succeed, but so much depends on the leadership of the united states and how well the new leaders of the united states are going to do on the world scene. >> 20 minute slough with marvin cal this morning. the book we've been talking about a different russia. russia, khrushchev and kennedy

know, china was still emerging from the from the this complete state control of the economy under the mao years. and this was a very radical thing, this idea that people found their own startups, run their own startups, and so, of course, in the shift from purely state controlled economy into hybrid capitalism, there very much was state guidance. and so you did see local local officials did play a role in sort of guiding how these companies were founded at the time. and you there were people working for the local state sector were involved in huawei as in its very early days days. so so yeah, there there was state guidance for sure. at the same time, i think both among officials and among these entrepreneurs in china at the time there was an enormous interest sort of trying out western style capitalism to the extent that they could at the time. so what the kind of market opening or the first opportunity that ren really saw and took advantage what was the first products that that huawei was able to kind of exist in the space between where the state was in these hybrid forms of capitalism.

your recall the food lines in the former soviet union under stalin, cuba, under castro or china under mao time today think of north korea under kim jong un or venezuela, nicolas maduro. compare those unproductive economies and the societies they created with the freedom and prosperity we've enjoyed the united states for the past 248 years. and, you know, i have some perspective on the threat that stakeholder capitalism poses to our democracy, our economic freedom, and our individual liberty. so who are these financial elites that want to alter or abandon our incredibly successful full of free market capitalist system? well, they're dominated by three massive asset management firms that strangely known as the big three, blackrock state street and vanguard. all three are primarily passive asset managers in the business of investing. other people's money is primarily moneys held in pension funds for one case or other retirement type vehicles. they're called passive asset managers for a reason. they're supposed to invest passively in a group of companies and let the ceos of those companies ru

i've read mao tse-tung, i've read, i've read karl marx, i've read lenin.derstanding, having some situational understanding about the country for which we are here to defend. general, there might not be a moment, i think, where the public got to see sort of the curiosity that drives this, this general and the decency and, and the fealty to the constitution in practice. and what is a quirk only of this political moment is that he was attacked for that. i think the maga movement revealed itself in its reaction to that. they didn't like what they heard. >> no, they did not. and it's sad because he's a great american patriot. he's a great scholar and statesman. he understands the difference. between loyalty to a person versus loyalty to the constitution. and he understands, you know, to have be intellectually curious to how soldiers need to be thinking about things like that, to be exposed to other, other theories, theories. that doesn't necessarily mean that they embrace it, but they certainly should understand that. and they should be students of history. the

birthday party earlier this year. 16 year old edward joe was alongside his parents, joe and kaitlyn mao. outside of skating. edward was learning to play piano. also lost 16 year old cory haynos, whose parents, stephanie and roger, also died in the collision. cory had just landed a clean triple axel, something he had spent months working on. i want to bring in kayleigh strid. he's a former skater for the swedish national skating team who coached these three young skaters, and carla, i'm so sorry. i can't even imagine the devastation you're feeling. you coached brielle and cory and edward. edward was one of your first students. what should people watching know about these three young skaters and their families? they should know that. >> they were all. >> fantastic individuals. >> and they should not. forget them. >> it's something that is. >> very important. >> to me and also the families. >> that i've spoken. >> to that are that are surviving of this, that they should not forget them. they were amazing people and they had such bright futures. >> i can't even imagine how hard these last f

in the 24 2a hours we've heard emily mao hours we've heard emily mao on, 's we've heard emily mao on,'he' emily 7 7 7 ’reign}gh'e’hgsheazfthe’fishy 7 7 7 ba mao on: shewas one of the first to be ba mao on: snewas one of the first to be released. he is hostages to be released. he is a dual israeli british she'd speaking to the prime minister. beenspeaking'to theprimerministeri keir starmer. she told beenspeaking'totherprin-terministerf. keir starmer. she told him in a sir keir starmer. she told him in a phone call that not only did she get proper adequate attention some bullet wounds 7 77§l>7m7e7hhttet7heh7hd£hrjt77 7 7 "gsm’;shra'wahgth’hs’ 7 7 7eerhehhttethehhdehhtthatshe for some bullet wounds but that she was also held live in buildings belonging to the un organisation thatis belonging to the un organisation that is responsible for palestinian israel has long refugees. israel has long accused the organisation of having staff in the seventh of october involved in the seventh of october attacks and saying that hamas uses buildings as command and control its buildings as command and c

and this come let's take a look at what secretary ofof state mao rubio said about closing usaid when he was asked by reporters redistrict in central america yesterday. >> might issue as iy said is there are things usaid that we do that we should continue to do and we will continue to do. but everything they do has to be in alignment witho the national interest and foreign policy of the united states and attitude usaid has adopted over the years is no, we are independent of the national interest. we fund programs perspective whether it's aligned are not aligned with the foreign policy. that's ridiculous. these are taxpayer dollars. every penny we spent in for a needs to be in furtherance and the aligned with the national interest and national come foreign policy of the united states. this is not about ending the program of usaid prepare things it does that are good and things it does that we have questions about. it's about the way it operates. this post take directions of the state to from policy direction they did not. they're completely uncooperative when you ask questions and try