maranda: he's absolutely right of the cases abroad and it is a fraud trial and it is fraudulent it isn interference quite obviously along with all of the other cases that have been brought against donald an election year, just to follow him and look, the judge inner on in this case is an elected democrat, he has not as you see in turn think and judge normally weighs the merits of the case and dispassionate, this is an apparatchik of the democratic party, patios already made his decision and donald trump is guilty this entire trial has just been about the extent of the punishment and you know he could destroy donald trumps well, families future and social is here and he supposedly no running for the democrat for the republican nomination. and instead, he is fighting for his financial life. and you know, it is completely unfair. liz: national jury in talking about a gambler. maranda: yes, and you new york is just riveted with crime and just yesterday, we had diner in manhattan, the gunman when and rubbed it and then gratuitously shot the poor guy sitting at the bar eating his fish, and

government's maranda scheme as a gimmick. russia has government's maranda scheme as a gimmick .rmed gimmick. russia has confirmed that one of its warships has been damaged in a ukrainian attack on a black sea port, which killed one and injured several more . the airstrike took several more. the airstrike took place at fedusa in russian occupied crimea earlier this morning . the head of the morning. the head of the ukrainian air force confirms its warplanes hit the russian landing ship. defence secretary grant shapps welcomes claims ukraine destroyed the vessel, saying it's a sign the war has not reached a stalemate . russian not reached a stalemate. russian defence minister sergei shoigu says forces have stopped ukraine's counteroffensive and are now pushing forwards on all fronts . marks and spencers and fronts. marks and spencers and john lewis are among major retailers who have opted to remain closed this boxing day . remain closed this boxing day. traditionally, the day after christmas is one of the busiest shopping days of the high streets, year expected streets, with this

when we come back we have more with maranda devine and tomi lahren on the tax charges filed against hunteren tonight as his father, the big guy, escapes any accountability. will that happen? . as we were starting to age, it's like, well how can we help our cognitive abilities? we saw prevagen. i did read the clinical study and went ahead and gave it a try. i feel that prevagen is helping me with overall clarity and as a pharmacist, i've recommended it to, not only just customers, but also to friends and family as a product to try. prevagen. at stores everywhere without a prescription. honey, i think i heard something. ok. ♪ from christmas tree mats... to floorliners... cargo liners.... no drill mud flaps... seat protectors... and more... weathertech has the perfect holiday gift. honey, is everything ok? oh yeah. order at weathertech.com and don't forget weathertech gift cards. ♪ upbeat music ♪ ♪ upbeat music ♪ ♪ upbeat music ♪ ♪ upbeat music ♪ ♪ upbeat music ♪ ♪ upbeat music ♪ we're travelling all across america, talking to people about their hearts. how's the heart? i feel like it's good.

just imaginehe world if maranda only applied in arizona or if mcdonald, which purported to extend the second to states and localities, had no application outside the city of chicago. very different world. so we so we accept that the supreme court can establish positive for lower courts, but how should it do it? it is problematic if the supreme court decides cases on extraordinarily narrow grounds because it is only deciding somewhere between 50 and 80 of the hundreds of thousands of cases that lower federal courts are hearing and when the supreme court decided cases on narrow or minimalist grounds, the supreme court is effectively delegating the lower courts' enormous power to define law with limited guidance from the supreme court, so there is at least a case to be made that minimalism itself is problematic at the supreme court. but there's also a case to be maybe -- made that the kinds of precedents the supreme court establishes matter. even if one is not originalist and even if one believes the supreme court could be originalist, it may be oblematic as a practical matter forhe supr

we at the doj the office a response ability report vista getting into the office of legal counsel maranda concerning issues related to the cia and its enhanced interrogation techniques on suspected terrorists? that opr report said that it contained seriously flawed arguments and did not constitute federal objective or legal advice, accusing both attorneys of professional misconduct in announcing its intent to the finding to disciplinary authorities. the report cites a memo frightens consistency with the standards of -- with the standards of applicable items. the particular provision towards water torture. host: kathleen, can you bring this -- caller: yes. mr. yoo, do you feel like the attorneys in the office of legal counsel change the torture laws that were already in standing? do you think the attorneys and the authorship should be held accountable? host: thank you. we believe that there. john yoo how will you like to respond to that? prof. yoo: it is a perfectly fair question. the report you read from his part of the process of holding people responsible for the decisions of the govern