i agree with marat sergeevich that someone simply does not like the way their puppets behave, how theysources. this is true, but the conflict looks like it, the more europe burns, the more hostilities go on, the americans clap their hands and earn money. money, and it would be desirable that conflicts appeared along the perimeter of russia and in europe itself, serbia, kosovo and the middle east, and let it burn with fire and blaze to prove that it’s simple, when this week an american official agreed to tell the truth, if suddenly there is a nuclear explosion on the territory of europe, some kind of real catastrophe. this has nothing to do with us americans, and we will not suffer. we are far away a few months ago it was hard to imagine that such a reaction would be in the west, but i literally quote a couple of quotes for our tv viewers. surely you hear those no less finational times it becomes outrageous ukrainians destroy trust in them no one blames ukraine they openly lie. this is more destructive than rockets are written by publications, the head of the city council, lyublino i am

is it as we said today, this is what marat sergeevich is right about and when you say that this is al the people who supported the nazi or uh, fascist ideology in our country, in fact, who called for the division of belarusians into pure belarusians unclean belarusians to leave russia completely. and we perfectly understand what this would lead to, who sponsored always sponsored the west, they spent their whole lives on a grant, more precisely, they always support, of course, this is a tool. they are this tool are used and successfully implemented in europe. let’s tell the truth, we successfully implemented it in ukraine, we didn’t succeed in implementing it in belarus, we burn it out with our knee iron, but we must remember that we will have to burn it further, and in europe this tool will still work sergeevich, he said that it’s not surprising that the west of nazism. here is a form. i also outlined my vision of the task. they turn to history, supporting nazism from there. from the forties, in fact, they are hitting today's russia in today's belarus as they link, they are the first

marat sergeevich remembers very well that our conversation lasted 2 years. and i i want to thank you today for that conversation. after all, the conversation went through a difficult time in 2020 , and that transmission is the facts that we conveyed to people. e, he gave confidence not only to the personnel of the police, but also to ordinary citizens , the confidence that the truth is on our side, so i want to tell you again, yes, thank you very much. this has had a very positive effect on people. as for the difference between the head of the central internal affairs directorate and the head of the ministry of internal affairs, of course, the difference is very large, and first of all. this the responsibility of this load is on the head of the central internal affairs directorate on the head of the minsk police. it is very large and for any head of the internal affairs directorate it is very huge, he is responsible for a large team in the region, but if we talk about the minister of internal affairs, then there is still a question of a certain policy. what

look, uh, and here and there, well, look, in fact, that yes on the one hand, marat sergeevich is absolutelyhing new, except for one thing, how cynically brazenly they tried to take away from us what we had been creating for many years under the guidance of . lukashenka whether someone likes this person or does not like it it is under his leadership. we have created today what we have and these figures, published today, here in belarus, probably, against more of the institution of the gap, it indicates that they simply brazenly wanted to take away from us, we found the answer. why three percent? yes, that's 3%. 1 + 1 + 1, that is, the figures turned, on the contrary, against the pension. here carefully. yes does not approve of the state course mini. fifteen percent, why such a large very percentage of those who support? i think that the gail institute did an honest survey. they interviewed people who are in the republic of belarus and those who are outside the republic turned out to be just representatives of that protest minority. they are currently and here still lost by these figures. tha

marat sergeevich remembers very well that our conversation lasted 2 years. and i want to thank you today for that conversation. you see, the conversation was difficult times in 2020. and that transmission is the facts that we conveyed to people. e, i gave confidence not only to the police personnel, but also to ordinary citizens, the confidence that the truth is on our side, so i want to tell you again, yes, thank you very much. this has had a very positive effect on people. as for the difference between the head of the central internal affairs directorate and the head of the ministry of internal affairs, of course, the difference is very big and, first of all, this is responsibility. uh, yes, the load on the head of the central internal affairs directorate on the head of the minsk militia. it is very large and for any head of the internal affairs directorate it is very huge, he is responsible for a large team in the region, but if we talk about the minister of internal affairs, then there is still a question of a certain policy. what is the ministry of the

yes on the one hand, marat sergeevich is absolutely right, we did not learn anything new, except forbrazenly they tried to take away from us what we had been creating for many years under the leadership. lukashenka whether someone likes this person or does not like it it is under his leadership. we have created today what we have, and these figures, published today here in belarus, probably against the will of the gallop institute, indicate that this just brazenly wanted to take away from us, we found the answer. why three percent? yes? one plus one plus one. that is, these numbers are turned, on the contrary carefully. yes does not approve of the state course less. fifteen percent, why is there such a large percentage of those who support, but i think that e institute gail conducted, honestly, this poll. they interviewed people who are in the republic of belarus. and those who turned out to be outside the republic are just representatives of that protest minority. they are in real moment and here we still lost by these figures. that is, they were no longer asked their opinion, they

specific orders from the body sergeevich sergey polyansky italian ekaterina belousova ntv krasnodar immediately after our release , the program of emergency with us maratll be aired. marat, what are you doing today? ah, egor today, in our issue, we will tell about a case that promises to become scandalous. in alapaevsk, a 60-year-old veteran of the war in afghanistan is being tried, ferodar is accused. diev. seduction of a minor, no one in his city believes in it, except for the neighbors with whom the former paratrooper has a long-standing conflict. at the same time, they wrote to ordeeva. we will hear a statement of the views of all parties in a couple of minutes. thank you pe next. but that's all for me for now, i say goodbye to you until the next news release on ntv at 16:00. see you. new gazprombank credit card card with the most favorable grace period of 180 days and guaranteed free service forever alps delicious cheese chocolate alpine delicious delicious.