george tanner is charged with killing his roommates rusty huffman early saturday morning at a home in marbury. there were drinking and then got into a fight. tanner pushed him to the ground and repeatedly kicked him. the victim's family cannot believe there father is gone. >> a friend doing something like that to another friend. >> if we saw him we would not know what to do, because we are that angry. >> his family wants to see him put away for a long time. he is in jail on $5 million bond. >>> health officials will inspect the occupy d.c. camp at mcpherson square investigating complaints that protesters are attracting rats, urinating in public, and using illegal drugs. the warnings are sparking speculation authorities may be preparing to evict the demonstrators. officials say there are no plans for eviction. >>> straight ahead on abc 7 news -- >> are your doors locked? >> yes i have two guns in my hand. >> a young mother takes her maternal instinct to a new level. and then, it brings new meaning to highway robbery. one of the largest car makers in the world is getting sued over claims of fra

a small ruling elite to basically hijack our governing structures in the court itself ever since marbury ever since eighteen zero three has become a small ruling elite and it would basically have nine black robes kings don't you know down the street here just a couple blocks from us who can knock down anything that our democratically elected representatives choose because of the marwari case and you know through the court took that power out of themselves right and and they aggressively do it all the time and let's just be clear the roberts course is probably the most the most extreme example of judicial activism we've seen in one hundred years from the supreme court i do believe that the courts should be used if individual human rights are actually being violated to the democratic process thank goodness that we had the court system to be able to you fight back. that's exactly to fight back against jim crow segregation but that's the point those laws violated the inherent in a legal rights of african-americans in the south or you could argue also that brown v board wouldn't have been nec

and scalia set a standard for future supreme court -- scalia didn't even want to admit that marbury versus madison was set in law that allowed him to have a job in the first place. i said you got to give him that. because otherwise you don't have a job. and i'm still not sure he ever said that he would agree that was settled law. but that sort of set the standard and then after he was confirmed i think by 9-0 the democrats started digging in in some of the other nominations that were to follow him and sort of like we're never ever going to let anybody answer as few questions as scalia did ever again in the history of the congress of the united states. and then we had in between before i got back to the white house the bourque fee as co. he did not realize he didn't need to explain anything to the senate of the united states, the judiciary committee and he talked himself into oblivion. and i think it was poor judgment on his part. so now we get the situation that is created by the nomination of david souter. frankly, after spending as much time as i spent with david during the confirmation