of hitting him on the head former new york knick marbury denies or positions calling them a one hundred percent of. the twenty twelve formula one season is fast approaching with their first start of the year this trillion brown prix getting going this weekend in melbourne too thought the nature cloran lewis hamilton has been speaking in the build up stating this year's contest is going to be a closer run thing after two seasons of sebastian vettel dominance. things having to be the top of the season probably yet just because we've got quite a close the driver's seat towards have. you know that serious and tough contenders and no say they're all in good cars as well so they're all in the top team so it's going to be a massively competitive year think the fans will love it. finally after a game which thirty four in the russian premier league it sells you were in the championship group with all four matches ending in a draw the top eight teams in fact only managing the score four goals the other nine all finding the nets in the relegation group here they are superb clocks it is called floo

america the answer is really simple be took on for themselves at eighteen no three in a case called marbury vs madison when chief justice john marshall the crankiest rightwinger of that age which is why john adams appointed him on his way out of office just to shove it in thomas jefferson's face when judge chief justice john marshall announced in that case that he was taking as part of supreme court president thomas jefferson when raising he wrote in a letter to sponsor roan who was patrick henry's father in the an old friend of his he wrote if this decision stands then indeed is our constitution a complete. a which is latin for a suicide pact the constitution jefferson wrote on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they may please because he is secretary of state james madison had won that case marbury vs what is it going to look so the supreme court took out of power that became precedent but there was so much public blowback and so many presidents were furious about this from jefferson to enter jackson it was rar

. >> marbury madison is the best case they ever decide it. the idea of judicial review for constitutionality i think is implicit. john marshall made it explicit in the great case of marbury versus madison. >> there is no one case that says as much as a justice about what it is like to be this. marbury versus madison is the embodiment of judicial review. there is the power in duty of them to say what the law is. he really established the court in a prominent position as one of the three political branches. the chief responsibility is to preside where the justices vote on and decide the cases. that means i get to initiate the discussion and have some responsibility to make sure all the issues are adequately aired. >> there is a change that each chief justice has their own method of handling this. this follows the tradition that has been followed for many years. >> there is not much the chief justice can do perri. they have a duty to uphold the constitution. you cannot fire them. you have to get along with them. we have traditions will outlast a

eleven the series it will but when the game was over one of the brave dragons fans accused peterson marbury of putting him on the head the former new york knicks denies the accusations calling them a one hundred percent laurie. i'm finally out again week thirty four in the russian premier league it's as you were in the championship group as all four matches ended in a draw the top eight only managed to score four goals altogether the other nine were all scored in the relegation group and here they all are in goals below. al. al. limit if al. qaida. alex alex . alex to eat . thanks. as always that's all the school for more in a little under two hours time joining that. the. long. nearly a billion people in the world are going hungry every day. in the united states even our trash cans are filled with food you just have to go get it all of these perfectly good eggs because one was cracked didn't even get all over the other ones just thrown all the way up and cheese from the german alps you clearly like the upper crust. in the dumpster at one am this morning three pm this afternoon on the grill

moral sentiments right up and that was his so there is an arc that arguably you can draw from from marbury vs madison or the supreme court first took on the power to declare was unconstitutional which is not given a constitution through dartmouth true through the first dash or so the pacific railroad for santa clara county. and then into. verses for laid away and and first national bank versus palladio all the way to citizens united none of these decisions and grover cleveland eight hundred eighty eight and state of the union are a said corporations have become the masters of the people the iron heel is on the throat of the people throughout this entire arc there has never been a legislature that has voted for this and there has never been a president who advocated it in fact to the contrary they have been laws against it and there have been presidents who have decried it. what do we do with this doctrine that the supreme court has been slowly and steadily building over almost two hundred year period. to to get out of this well look i mean first of all it's so institutionalized now it's so

of our revolutionary patriots and for me a constitution he added that because of john marshall's marbury decision he gave courts the power to strike down laws remember it's not in the constitution that the courts now had even more power than the executive the president he wrote a fraction once possessing themselves of the bench of a county he was a county governments that you can apply to federal governments as well and never be broken up but hold their county in chains forever indissoluble if these justices are the real executive as well as judiciary in other words marshall your logic logic is that the people can't be trusted to throw our politicians who pass unconstitutional laws and therefore we need to have naing all wise people on the supreme court to decide whether a law will be rejected or not that isn't democracy that's a kingdom with the supreme court justices as kings you really want that kind of country remember you can't vote the supreme court out of office in that same letter jefferson talked about how the appointed senate and supreme court would defend the rich as the senat

. >> reporter: police arrested four men, william smith, damian marbury, gerard brun and samuel afuwaca, all charged with theft. the attorney for the shop says the police have it all wrong. >> all of the items that were confiscated belong to them. en think you'll find out that there is no connection. >> reporter: police also found more than a dozen large bottles of tide liquid detergent. >> the liquid tide story has gone national. it is such a problem across the country. >> reporter: some retailers are putting anti-theft devices on containers that can retail for close to $20. paul wagner, fox 5 news. >> it is amazing what people will get for something hike that. >> we have reported on the tide just as she was saying. it is a big problem. >>> fox 5 is helping you celebrate a big centennial down at the tidal basin. >> a lot of us wearing pink today to sort of symbolize our big day out at the tidal basin. tucker barnes, you are out there. you got the punk tie too, my friend. >> good morning. -- you got the pink tie too, my friend. >> good morning. this is the pick. week weather-wise to get

after marbury v madison, they are final.ther you agree with them not, this court renders the final decision on what the law means. justice alito is correct in stating the values that motivate many of the justices. in terms of his own vote, he is a very predictable justice, one of the most predictable. he tends to vote consistently on of the right. justice kennedy is cut from a different bolt. he tends to vote with conservatives in many areas, but he is more of an unpredictable swing vote on issues of this kind. he has gone both ways on that this treaty voted to strike down at two major federal laws. he voted to support, in the rice case, the federal claim. host: we will delve into these in the next hour, but we want to go to capitol hill before the courts, and congressman rod andrews, democrat of new jersey, is joining us with his take on this week's oral arguments. >> thanks for being with us. what are you hoping here today? >> i am hoping to hear the basis of a conservative and decision, because a conservative decision wou

but, of course, marshall set the precedent that everyone followed whether it was marbury v. madison in 1803, i mean, this sets the stage for every supreme court decision that we've had from there on out. and he was being very disingenuous, but i think for marshall himself he was playing politics more than anything else, and he really didn't like the jeffersonians, and he worked against them this any way he could. other questions? don't be shy. come on down to the microphone so we can get you on tv. >> [inaudible] >> okay. >> have you ever -- [inaudible] >> i have not. um, primarily because in a survey course, you know, you focus on the general things and move from there. but, yeah, i just, i haven't. and we're, we have a textbook, and that's about it, you know? we try to stay in that, in that very general terms in a survey course. other questions? >> [inaudible] >> sure. >> ?awbl. [inaudible] >> three. one hasn't been published. it'll come out in may a, but three. >> [inaudible] >> well, thanks. >> [inaudible] >> well, i mean, the mechanism was there to change it. i think, y

marbury versus madison, of course. second thing is i'm not sure we want to look at what people in the 1700's would do with respect to policy. obviously, they thought blacks in america should be enslaved. they did address that in the constitution. they said that they were 3/2 of a human being. -- 2/3. perhaps they would not want minorities to get health care, since they thought they should be slaves. if so i am not sure how useful it is to look to that. host: thanks for the call. our question is on the constitution and is this what the framers intended with the debate over the health care? we will take your calls and comments. if you want to continue the conversation on line, you may do so on our facebook page or send it to c-span at. pope benedict visiting cuba, raising the issue of rights and religion. it is also the unpaid of the financial times and inside the washington journal. and this headline from the chicago sun-times, representative bobby rush reprimanded on the house of representatives floor for his comment o