now unfortunately cass gilbert, the architect, said no, they weren't talking about marbury at all.ut that's one of those, you know, the facts shouldn't interfere with a good story. [laughter] but magna carta was significant with respect to judicial review in another way. it was written down and that , became very important for us. if you read marbury against madison, marshall said is basically we have this text and we have this statute. and if the statute conflicts with this text, one or the other has to yield and we are enforcing this judgment. we're just deciding a simple case between marbury and madison but to do so, we have to see which text controls. and obviously the constitution trumps the statute. and there is no judicial review clause in the constitution. there is a provision that the court will decide cases in controversies. and all marshall said was, well if we have to decide a case we , we have to decide whether the statute conflicts with the constitution. and we have to decide what the constitution a trumps, so the fact that you're dealing with a written document was v