and marbury madness, a star is reborn in china. >> he's the hero of beijing. captioning sponsored by cbs this is the "cbs evening news" with scott pelley. >> pelley: today the islamic terrorist group known as isis said it is responsible for the attack on a famous antiquities museum in tunisia in north africa. today, hundreds gathered there to voice their support for their fledgling democracy. gunmen murdered 23 people yesterday, most of them european tourists. dozens were wounded. the police killed two of the gunmen. today's claim by isis may or may not be true. police are rounding up the suspects, and allen pizzey is in tunis. >> reporter: tunisian state television has turned yesterday's terror attack into a fast-moving music video to bolster the image of its security forces. but for those who lived through it, the experience was a story written in blood. this french tourist gave her name only as mariline. "my friend and i put blood on our faces and bodies to pretend that we were dead. we stayed like this without moving laying on the ground," she said. "we we

the starlight marbury can take the subway in beijing, jong ling told us. our brother. >> people ask me about china all the time. i say you've got to come to china to see for yourself. me telling you, you're not going to believe me. >> reporter: probably because stefan marbury can't believe it himself, witnessing how much he's been embraced on the other side of the world. >> he's the hero of beijing. >> reporter: seth doane, cbs news, beijing. >>> coming up after your local news on "cbs this morning," more on the investigation into the investigation of the bloody arrest of a uva student. we'll be live from charlottesville. >>> plus inside a look at what can stop the looting of antiquities. >>> and we'll take you on the set of the show "the late late show" with james corden. that's the "cbs morning news" for this friday. thanks for watching. i'm anne-marie green. have a great day. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com >>> your realtime captioner is linda marie macdonald. >>> taking a live look out at the golden gate bridge right now, very early this friday m

and marbury madness, a star is reborn in china. >> he's the hero of beijing.g sponsored by cbs this is the "cbs evening news" with scott pelley. >> pelley: today the islamic terror

and marbury madness, a star is reborn in china. >> he's the hero of beijing. captioning sponsored by cbs this is the "cbs evening news" with scott pelley. >> pelley: today the islamic terrorist group known as isis

staying with the retail space the new chief executive is named for marbury. -- mulberry.t the uk's largest online only fashion retailer rose 19% after the company pushed to improve performance abroad as currency movements hurt its u.k. business. profits slid by 14% as the group's cops cutting push failed to make an impact at volkswagen. they're boosting profit through reduced spending and higher productivity. the imf has approved a 17.5 billion dollar bailout package for ukraine to help the country avoid default. it is a much-needed lifeline for an economy struggling because of the continued conflict in the eastern part of the country. let's get straight to tony in moscow. how urgently does ukraine need the money? tony: extremely urgently. it has been hanging on to this lifeline while it fights the twin problems of the economic crisis and the conflict in the east. the government expects the economy to contract by 11.9% this year and the currency has hit a record low in february before the central bank decided to intervene and raise its key rate to 30% last month, which me

and judicial supremacy and yet as i reflect on it i believe that the supreme court got it right in marbury versus madison in 1803. they are the supreme court said the constitution exists to limit government. there are limits on -- those limits are meaningless unless they are enforce enforced. without the court they will often go on enforced. i spent almost 40 years now representing prisoners including some on death row. they represent one time a detainee that they represent a homeless man in united states supreme court. a realism that for my clients use the courts are nothing. criminal defendants, prisoners homeless people rarely will win in a legislative process. one is the last time a state legislature adopted a law to expand the rights of criminal dependence? when was the last time a state legislature in its own passed a law to increase the rights of prisoners? so even though these groups they often lose in court for people like my client is really the courts are nothing. >> are the benefits to people who like your clients were some of the cost you identify in a book on the cost to peop

marbury vs. madison. it was up to the courts to make the determination of what the constitution said. as for voting for this, hurting our case, that is -- it's not our case it's the attorney general's case of the states, that is before the courts currently, if this voting to defund homeland security, that doesn't have any funding for the president's action, hurts our case then i would say that any law that passes congress can't be declared unconstitutional because we all voted for it. that's not reality. again, let the courts do their job. now, it's true that a majority in this congress and in the senate voted to defund the president's actions. but because of the senate rules it didn't pass. we didn't even get to go to conference because of the senate rules. some people suggest, maybe we ought to change the senate rules. we ought to insist that the senate change their rules. for the for the last four, eight years, i was kind of glad the way the senate rules were. they prevented what i believe a lot of bad

and judicial supremacy and yet as i reflect on it i believe that the supreme court got it right in marbury versus madison in 1803. they are the supreme court said the constitution exists to limit government. there are limits on -- those limits are meaningless unless they are enforce enforced. without the court they will often go on enforced. i spent almost 40 years now representing prisoners including some on death row. they represent one time a detainee that they represent a homeless man in united states supreme court. a realism that for my clients use the courts are nothing. criminal defendants, prisoners homeless people rarely will win in a legislative process. one is the last time a state legislature adopted a law to expand the rights of criminal dependence? when was the last time a state legislature in its own passed a law to increase the rights of prisoners? so even though these groups they often lose in court for people like my client is really the courts are nothing. >> are the benefits to people who like your clients were some of the cost you identify in a book on the cost to peop

marbury vs. madison.t was up to the courts to make the determination of what the constitution said. as for voting for this, hurting our case, that is -- it's not our case it's the attorney general's case of the states, that is before the courts currently, if this voting to defund homeland security, that doesn't have any funding for the president's action, hurts our case then i would say that any law that passes congress can't be declared unconstitutional because we all voted for it. that's not reality. again, let the courts do their job. now, it's true that a majority in this congress and in the senate voted to defund the president's actions. but because of the senate rules it didn't pass. we didn't even get to go to conference because of the senate rules. some people suggest, maybe we ought to change the senate rules. we ought to insist that the senate change their rules. for the for the last four, eight years, i was kind of glad the way the senate rules were. they prevented what i believe a lot of bad s

and judicial supremacy and yet as i reflect on it i believe that the supreme court got it right in marburyversus madison in 1803. they are the supreme court said the constitution exists to limit government. there are limits on -- those limits are meaningless unless they are enforce enforced. without the court they will often go on enforced. i spent almost 40 years now representing prisoners including some on death row. they represent one time a detainee that they represent a homeless man in united states supreme court. a realism that for my clients use the courts are nothing. criminal defendants, prisoners homeless people rarely will win in a legislative process. one is the last time a state legislature adopted a law to expand the rights of criminal dependence? when was the last time a state legislature in its own passed a law to increase the rights of prisoners? so even though these groups they often lose in court for people like my client is really the courts are nothing. >> are the benefits to people who like your clients were some of the cost you identify in a book on the cost to peopl