that is what marbury stands for. host: give me your thoughts on why this matters. >> so, your audience has heard of judicial review. in a nutshell, it is not just the supreme court. all courts in the system have the ability to disregard the act of congress or state law, if, in a judge's view, the law is inconsistent with the constitution. the interesting thing about judicial review is, marbury is the first case and it, judicial review, was not that vigorous before the civil war. marbury becomes more important to later in the story. looking back, it was a more narrow decision than we remember it being. host: you tell a story to tell that has a cast of characters. we want to introduce you to names you will be hearing throughout the 90 minutes and understand the role that they played in marbury v. madison coming to this report. let's start with john adams. where was his political career? >> he was the president who was elected in 1796. he served under george washington. he was in a presidential election between him and

we begin with marbury versus madison. tonight, hillary clinton .alks about gun violence all those who have business before the supreme court are admonished to give -- >> landmark cases explores the human story and constitutional drop was behind historic decisions -- constitutional drama behind historic decisions. >> we are hearing roe against wade. >> the significant decisions are once that the court took unpopular positions. caseswill go through that illustrates what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who stick together because they believe in the rule of law. host: good evening and welcome to landmark cases. we will look at cases that have affected the country and the development of society. madison.is marbury v. it came about with founding fathers who developed enmity. we have guests at the table to help us discuss the case and the history. professor and has been since 1985. professor and has been since 1985. and a former supreme court clerk who is the co-author of a book on marbury v. madiso

we begin with marbury vs. madison. that's next on c-span. >> all those who have business before the supreme court are admonished to draw near and give their attention. >> landmark cases. the special theories produced in cooperation with the national constitution center. exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic supreme court decisions. 759, petition. >> we hear arguments of number 18 in roe v wade. >> quite often, are ones that the court took the unpopular decision. >> let's go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what ofmeans to live in a society 310 million different people, who helped stick together because they believe in the rule of law. host: good evening and welcome to c-span's new series landmark cases. tonight and for the next 11 weeks we will look at 12 cases that have affected the country and the development of the court and society. tonight the cases in marbury v madison, one of the earliest cases. it is interesting because it came about between t

what about william marbury? >> whatever happened to james marbury?t that question from my students. >> marbury continued to be very active in business affairs in washington, d.c. over the course of the next 30 years or so. he had his hand in lots of different business ventures, a bank, a place that imported suits from england. but, you know, the house that marbury lived in during this time still stands. it's in georgetown. it's actually the embassy of ukraine today. and you can see it there. it was basically marbury's command post during this entire period. >> well, special thanks to our two terrific guests for our first and our landmark cases. akhil amar and cliff stone. lots more discussion about the supreme court. thank you for starting it off with us. we appreciate. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> and thanks to viewers. your questions make this interesting. we hope you'll be with us throug t

and a former supreme court clerk who is the co-author of a book on marbury v. madison. to start, we will listen to the current chief justice talking about the importance of the case. after we hear his point of view, we would like to hear from both of you. >> marshall established that the court is the interpreter of the constitution in the decision he wrote with marbury v. madison. he said, we are in court that has to decide cases. we have to determine what the constitution means. that is our job. he regarded the constitution as law. that is away our constitution is different from others. for many, constitutions are

it was marbury v madison. marbury was one of those judges.ically, hesaid probably deserves some remedy but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress. the authority of congress. so the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this is something the court had never done before. congress an act of unconstitutional. >> that is tonight at 8:00 eastern and civic on c-span's q and a. on monday as the supreme court start a new term, c-span debuts a new series, landmark cases: historic supreme court decisions. we take a look at the real story behind the famous marbury v madison case, delving into the heating battles between outgoing thomas jefferson, and newly appointed chief justice john marshall. >> he established that the interpreter of the constitution, in his famous decision. >> marbury v madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> joining the discussion, law school professor and discuss her, and an author. landmark cases, if going 12 -- exploring 12 historic supreme court rul

it was called marbury versus madison. marbury was one of these judges. and the court said that basically, he probably deserves some remedy. but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress. the authority of congress. and so the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this wasme court, something they had never done before. congress an act of unconstitutional. >> that is sunday night at 8:00 on c-span's q&a. as the supreme court starts a new term, we give you our new series -- landmark cases. we take a look at the real story behind marbury versus madison, delving into the heated battles train president james madison and thomas jefferson and john marshall. theohn marshall established court as the interpreter of the constitution. his famous decision he wrote in marbury versus madison -- >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous case the supreme court ever decided. >> joining the discussion is yale law school professor and author. whooring the life and times were the plaintiffs, lawyers, and justices in

versus madison, marbury was one of those judges, and the court said basically he probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress, and so the supreme court was going to strike down that law. and this is something the court had never done before. you know, declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. at 8:00is sunday night eastern and pacific on c-span's "q&a." and on monday, c-span debuts its new series "landmark cases," historic supreme court decisions. on the series premiere, we take a look at the real story behind the famous marbury versus madison case, delving into the heated debate between outgoing president john adams, the new president thomas jefferson, and justice john marshall. john marshall established the courts as the interpreter of the constitution. v. madison is probably the most famous case ever decided. >> joining the discussion, yell yale law school professor akhil reed -- the plaintiffs, lawyers, and cases.s in these "landmark cases" premieres live at 9:00 p.m. eastern on c-

marbury was one of those judges.nd the court said basically that he probably deserved some remedy, but the remedy of congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress, so that the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this was something the court had never done before. you know, declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. chief justice marshall said very strenuously that the exclusive province of the judiciary to state what the law is, and that is basically the foundation of how the supreme court operates today and why it is so important and it is still in some ways very controversial. former arkansas governor mike huckabee has said, why should the supreme court have the final word on things like same-sex marriage? where is that written? and in fact, it is not in the institution, but it is marbury vs. madison. brian: if you go to the supreme court website, they are only going to meet in open fashion for 39 days starting tomorrow. 39 out of 365. they're only goin

madison. >> marbury madison is probably the most famous piece this court ever decided >> march 1911 the famous incident as many of you know, 146 john emails of workers that died at the time of the factory fire and this event was precipitated by an industry that is highly explicative of the airline industry where department stores contracted out to subcontractors to make clothing very cheaply and the conditions in the sweatshops were terrible was sexual exploitation of workers, workplace safety come in they went on strike with the uprising of the 20,000 in order to improve their lives. they will lost workplace safety which years later the cost was clear when 146 of them died and in new york fell lower east side people saw this happen the wealthy people saw this happening literally saw the workers who made their clothes die and because of that they finally began to identify with the workers to and decide for accountability that led to a series of reforms on workers on book safety or fire safety, etc.. that is a beginning point when americans said if we want to stand up to the excess of am

it was marbury versus madison. marbury was one of those judges, and the court said basically that he probably deserved some remedy, but the remedy that congress provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress. the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this is something the court had never done before, declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. >> that is sunday night at 8:00 and onstern and pacific, monday as the supreme court starts a new term, c-span debuts "landmark cases." on the series premiere, we take a look at the real story behind the famous marbury versus madison case, delving into the heated battles between outgoing president john adams, the new tom -- the new president thomas jefferson, and the newly appointed justice john marshall. >> john marshall established that the court as the interpreter of the constitution in the famous decision he wrote in marbury versus madison. >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >>

marbury was one of those judges. and the court said basically that he probably deserved some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress, so that the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this is something the court had never done before. you know, declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. chief justice marshall said very strenuously that the exclusive province of the judiciary to say what the law is, and that is basically the foundation of how the supreme court operates today and why it is so important and it is still in some ways very controversial. former governor of arkansas huckabee has said, who says the supreme court have the final word on things like same-sex marriage? where is is written? brian: if you go to the supreme court website, they are only going to meet in open fashion session for 39 days starting tomorrow, 39 out of 365. they're only going to hear three or four, not very many cases. why so few days? tony: be

it was called marbury v. madison. marbury was one of the judges. basically, he probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress, so the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this is something that the court -- never done before declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. >> better tonight at 8:00 p.m. et and pacific. c-span debuts its new series "landmark cases." on the series premiere take a look at the real story behind the famous marbury v. madison case, delving into the heated political battles between outgoing president john adams, the new president thomas jefferson and the chief justice john marshall. >> john marshall established the court as the interpreter of the constitution. in his famous decision he wrote in marbury v. madison. madison isv. probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> joining the discussion is ofil reed amar, and author "the great decision," cliff sloan. landmark cases premieres live this monday at 9:0

i'm mentioned marbury versus madison. that was -- some would have thought, what in heck are they doing? but it established the supreme court as an equal power. then you see things like fred scott where it -- like dred scott where it was a terrible decision. it ebbs and flows. i could talk about others. there were some bad parts. rights wereividual brought, during the war, that was a good movement. talking about one person, one vote. choose, iright oto believe, was a very good vote. others would disagree. now, we are going into a very shaded and concerned era, where the right to vote is being diminished greatly, and if that continues, this country will be badly damaged by it. untraveled amounts of money to control the election? that will hurt us and put us back to the age where only the wealthy, and only certain individuals, have power in this country instead of one person, one vote having real substance. it will also bring about a cynicism and disillusionment among voters, and this country will suffer by that. host: right

madison. >> marbury v.adison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> joined the discussion, landmark cases, exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings by repeating the life and times of the people who were the plaintiffs and lawyers and justices. "landmark cases" premieres live tonight at 9 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3 and c-span radio. for background on each case while you watch order your copy of "landmark cases" companion book at c-span.org/landmarkcas c-span.org/landmarkcases. >> tonight on "the communicators," chip pickering, ceo of comp teg, ceo of comp tell discusses3 communicators," chip pickering, ceo of comp tell discusses spectrum auctions, negative and other issues involving you, broadband and television. >> as the legacy telephone companies transitions from copper and something called tdm, and all technology, circuit-switched, to ip, new technology and new networks, how do we make sure that our public safety, the 911, how do we make sure that competition that has taken

it was called marbury versus madison. -- thoseas one of them judges.court said, basically, he probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress -- the theority of congress, so, supreme court was going to strike down that a law -- that law. this is something the court had never done before, you know, declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. >> that is sunday night at 8:00 p.m. eastern and pacific. on monday, as the supreme court c-spanthe new term, debuts "landmark cases." on the debut, we look at the real story in the market versus madison case. -- marbury versus madison case. >> john marshall established the court is the interpreter of the constitution in the famous decision he wrote in marbury versus madison. justice ginsburg: marbury-medicine is probably the most famous case. omar andg is a key cliff sloan. cases" is the life and times of the people that were in these cases. c-span,eres live on c-span3, and c-span radio. background, order your copy of "landmark cases" companion

and his famous decision that he wrote in marbury versus madison. famousrobably the most case this court ever decided. .> join the discussion landmark cases, exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings by revealing the life and times of the people who were the plaintiffs, lawyers, and justices in these cases. it prepares this monday at 9 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. for background while you watch, krder your copy of landmar cases at c-span.org. >> now we would hear from former vice president al gore from this week's washington ideas forum hosted by the atlantic and aspen institute. it explores a range of topics, violence injustice, health, and technology. james: thank you all for coming. thanks so much to vice president al gore for joining us. he has done a lot of traveling so thanks for making the effort. as i promised yesterday, the vice president has nothing to talk about you might not be expecting. there are things you probably will expect, given his political expertise, the things you know about what he has been doing in t

host: marbury versus madison case, a key case in the concept.uest: i understand c-span will be focusing on that tonight. host: i appreciate that. will be focusing on that in our new series, a 12 part series focusing on the historic supreme decisions starting tonight at 9:00 p.m. on c-span. let us go to leanne in beverly hills, florida, on the line for democrats. caller: good morning. i call all of the district attorney and u.s. senate and u.s. congress. nobody has an answer. how do we remove the statute of limitations on rape and insist in this country and making a national? catch somebody and seven years later you catch them again, the other one is moved and we cannot secure them for it.it is hard to prosecute on these things. it would make it feel better having been raped myself and letting the guy go to court and not let him rape somebody else. guest: i am very sorry to hear about your experience. statute of limitations can be changed. it is controversial about whether they can revive a case that has already gone under the statute of limitati

his famous decision he wrote in marbury versus madison. versus madison is probably the most famous case that this course -- this court ever decided. >> a yellow law school professor will join the discussion. , exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings by revealing the life and times of the people who are the plaintiffs, lawyers, and justices in these cases. it premieres live this monday at 9 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. for background on each case, order your copy of landmark $.95 at thedollars website. >> located on the national mall in washington, d.c., the national gallery of art was a gift to the american people from andrew mellon, who served as treasury secretary from 1920 12 1932. we visit the museum to learn about early american portrait painting. in this program we feature the work of gilbert stuart. his unfinished portrait of george washington is the image on the one dollar bill. dianne: hello, i am dianne stephens from the national gallery of art. who campbell is an artist is well known for his history pai

wroteamous decision, he marbury versus madison. >> is probably the most famous course -- case the course ever decide. akil amar and cliff sloan. premieres this" monday at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. -- copy your cases of of the companion book. addition to the series, we spoke with bob goodlatte about some of the cases featured in the program and how they are relevant today. and the relationship between the supreme court and congress. bob goodlatte, i want to start in our conversation in understanding the role of your committee and the supreme court. what is your responsibility? rep. goodlatte: the judiciary committee was established in 1813. a couple years ago, we celebrated the 200th anniversary. it deals with an array of issues, but one of the things i love most is it deals with the u.s. constitution, the amendments to the constitution. any new amendments that are introduced are referred to the judiciary committee. in other areas, we are constantly trying to refer back to the constitution for guidance on what is appropriate legislation and what is not. when i bec

madison spent marbury v. madison is probably the most famous case is court ever decided. >> join the discussion. "landmark cases" printers live tonight at 9 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3 and c-span radio. for background on each case while you watch order your copy right of the book available for $8.95 plus shipping at c-span.org/landmarkcases. >> up the next remarks in president obama at the 34th annual national fallen firefighters memorial service held just at the national fire academy in emmitsburg maryland honor at the 84 firefighters who died on duty in 2014. [applause] >> thank you. craig, thanks for that introduction, but more importantly, thank you for the outstanding work that you and your team do all across the country every single day. for those of you who know craig, you know that he is cool under pressure, no doubt because he got his start, started his career as a firefighter. i want to thank congressman steny hoyer, fire administrator ernest mitchell, chief dennis compton, and everybody at the

marbury was one of the judges. basically that he probably deserved some remedy put the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress, so the supreme court was going to start this ist law and something the court had never done before. declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. >> sunday night at eight :00 eastern and pacific. on monday as the supreme court sides with any term, c-span debuts "landmark cases: historic supreme court cases." we take a look at the famous marbury versus madison case, delving into he did battles between old presidents like john adams, new president and john marshall. >> john marshall established the court as the interpreter of the constitution and his famous decision in marbury versus madison. >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous court case this ever decided. >> yale law school professor and exploring cook slowly 12 supreme court cases filing -- revealing the lives and cases. for background on each case quality

we begin with marbury vs. madison. that's next on c-span. >> all those who have business before the supreme court are admonished to draw near and give their attention. >> landmark cases. the special theories produced in cooperation with the national constitution center. exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic supreme court decisions. 759, petition. >> we hear arguments of number 18 in roe v wade. >>

what about william marbury? >> whatever happened to james marbury? i always get that question from my students. >> marbury continued to be very active in business affairs in washington, d.c. over the course of the next 30 years or so. he had his hand in lots of different business ventures, a bank, a place that imported suits from england. but, you know, the house that marbury lived in during this time still stands. it's in georgetown. it's actually the embassy of ukraine today. and you can see it there. it was basically marbury's command post during this entire period. >> well, special thanks to our two terrific guests for our first and our landmark cases. akhil amar and cliff stone. lots more discussion about the supreme court. thank you for starting it off with us. we appreciate. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> and thanks to viewers. your questions make this interesting. we hope you'll be with us throughout the series. ♪ >>> c-span's landmark cases series continues next monday. dred scott was enslaved by u.s. army surgeon dr. john emerson. after dr.

marbury versus madison. marbury was one of the judges. he court said, basically, probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress, and so the supreme court was going to thise down that law, and was something the court had , declaring anore act of congress unconstitutional. >> that's sunday night at 8:00 eastern and pacific on c-span's q&a. on monday, as the court starts its new term, c-span reviews decisions and landmark cases. we take a look at the real story behind the marbury versus madison case, delving into the political battles between john jefferson, and john marshall. >> john marshall established the as the interpreter of the constitution in his famous decision that he wrote, marbury versus madison. >> marbury v madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> straining the discussion, a yale law school professor and author. landmark cases, exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings premier's life this monday at 9:00 p.m.

marbury was one of those judges. and the court said, basically, that he probably deserved some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress. and so the supreme court was going to strike down that law x x -- and the supreme court -- and this was something the court had never done before, you know, declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. >> that's sunday night at eight eastern and pacific on c-span's q&a. and on monday as the supreme court starts the new term, c-span debuts its new series, landmark cases: historic supreme court decisions. we take a look at the real story behind the famous marbury v. madison case, delving into the heated political battles between john adams, thomas jefferson and the newly-appointed chief justice, john marshall. >> john marshall established the court as the interpreter of the constitution. in his famous decision he wrote in marbury v. madison. >> marbury and madison is probably the most famous case court ev

and so marbury versus madison establishes that. it is also have a great case case that a great shows the personal stories behind these cases. there is a battle going on between john adams, thomas jefferson, and john marshall behind the scenes that is really the story of this case. it has legal import. but these shows really impersonal stories that are engaging and illuminating of the time. on monday. p.m. landmark cases executive producer, we appreciate it. mark thank you, greta. : journalists --nd offers and journalists -- authors and journalists talk about the 2016 president torres at federal hall -- the 2016 presidential race at federal hall. this is an hour. we embark our 10th anniversary in 2016. we are poised to embark on a series of of vents. in the first 10 years, we shared the role in the invention of america. history from the indigenous peoples to the dutch colonies. the revolutionary war to the first seat of government. we are gratified to have had the support of the community trust.

versus madison, marbury was one of those judges, and the court said basically he probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of

our series premiere focuses on marbury versus madison, which established the basis for judicial review, giving the supreme court the power to invalidate acts of other branches of government when they violate the constitution. that's live tonight at 9:00 eastern on c-span. >> the house energy and commerce committee heard from state health insurance marketplace . this is two hours. >>> good morning. the subcommittee of oversight and investigation convenes this hearing today to examine the state health insurance marketplaces established under the affordable care act. we seek to understand the sustainability challenges these state exchanges continue to face. the centers for medicaid and medicare services has awarded $5.51 billion to the states to help them establish their exchanges. let me repeat that. the states receive $5.51 billion in federal taxpayer dollars to set up their own exchanges yet the aca had no specific definition of what a state exchange was supposed to do or more importantly, what it was not supposed to do. this is compensation without limitation. since the funding for th

host: marbury versus madison case, a key case in the concept. guest: i understand c-span will be focusing on that tonight. host: i appreciate that. will be focusing on that in our new series, a 12 part series focusing on the historic supreme decisions starting tonight at 9:00 p.m. on c-span. let us go to leanne in beverly hills, florida, on the line for democrats. caller: good morning. i call all of the district attorney and u.s. senate and u.s. congress. nobody has an answer. how do we remove the statute of limitations on rape and insist in this country and making a national? catch somebody and seven years later you catch them again, the other one is moved and we cannot secure them for it.it is hard to prosecute on these things. it would make it feel better having been raped myself and letting the guy go to court and not let him rape somebody else. guest: i am very sorry to hear about your experience. statute of limitations can be changed. it is controversial about whether they can revive a case that has already gone under the statute of limita

dealt with it.rt it was marbury versus madison. marbury was one of those judges.asically, he, probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress, the authority of congress. the supreme court was going to strike down the law. this is something the court had never done before. declaring an act of congress unconstitutional. >> that is tonight on c-span's "q&a." on monday, as the supreme court starts its new term, c-span debuts its new series, "landmark cases." we take a look behind the famous ,arbury versus madison case the marshall established court as the interpreter of the constitution. >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. discussion, akhil sloan.mar and cliff premieres live this monday at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span 3, and c-span radio. for background on this case what you watch, order your copy of " companion book. in august 1940 5, 70 years ago, american forces dropped two atomic bombs over japan.

marbury before coming to the center for popular democracy received a law degree from newhaven, called yale, before that with bronx the vendors, equal justice initiative, she also worked in zimbabwe, along the way, master's, how old are you? how did you do all this and then was working in south africa teaching at nelson mandela's alma mater. marjorie will talk about her work at the center for popular democracy, the movement for black lives. [applause] >> it is a huge honored to be here. going to lean a little bit. thank you also much for having me here. it is a huge honor both because the panel is this team, so many folks i admired look up to but i do a lot of local work on city councils and organizations and we are constantly dream and scheming and it is -- we can't pass this. is fun to be in a roomful of folks at the state level, the obstacles that the local level can address the obstacles. it is the huge pleasure and honor to be here. i am going to start by talking about what we have been doing and what is the place of state legislators in enacting transformational change. most raci

series which explores historic supreme court decisions including marbury versus madison, korematsu versus united states, brown versus the board of education, miranda versus arizona, and roe vs wade. veteran supreme court journalist tony mauro and published by c-span. landmark cases is available for $8.95. >> over the next few weeks, c-span's american history tv will air a selection of oral histories with african-american community leaders. the project titled explorations was ack leadership collaboration between university of virginia professor phyllis leffler and julian bond. in 10 minutes, we will hear from julian bond as he remembers his career as a civil rights leader. thealks about growing up in segregated south, his involvement with the student nonviolent coordinating committee, and his later political career. first project or rector phyllis leffler discusses the origins of this oral history collection and its historical importance. this program is a little over 90 minutes. phyllis leffler, what is the explorations in black leadership project? >> it's a videotaped oral history interv

guide to our landmark cases series which explores 12 historic supreme court decisions, including marburysus madison. komatsu versus united states. brown versus the board of education. miranda versus arizona, and roe versus wade. denmark cases, the book features introductions, highlights, the impact of each case. written by veteran supreme court journalist tony mauro, and published by c-span in an imprint ofth sage publications incorporated. landmark cases is available for a dollars $.95 plus shipping. get your copy at c-span.org/weimar cases >> each week american history tv's reel amercia brings you archival films that help to tell

the famous decision he wrote of marbury versus madison. >> marbury and madison is probably the most famous case the court decided. >> author of "the great decision" cliff sloan. "landmark cases," exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings by revealing the people who were the plaintiffs, lawyers and justices in this case. "landmark cases" premiers live tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3 and c-span radio. for background on each case while you watch, order the companion book available for $8.95 plus shipping at c-span.org/landmarkcases. >>> the leaders of canada's three major parties debated foreign policy issues. conservative party leader stephen har ber, new democratic leader thomas mulcair and justin trudeau. the leaders speak in both french and english. some portions of the event do not include english translation. >>> you don't know which of your factories will be demolished. >> russia's political leaders are not just rulers of their nation, they're country's owners. >> you don't know which of your arguments will be totally destroyed. >> i'm not prepared to sacrific the afr

[laughter] stephon marbury, new yorkers remember him, do you?e played for the knicks and then to china and guess what, he's taking on michael jordan off the court, criticizing him for the price of sneakers. it's controversial and it's next. you wouldn't take medicine without checking the side effects. hey honey. huh. the good news is my hypertension is gone. so why would you invest without checking brokercheck? check your broker with brokercheck. >> point guard stephon marbury getting ready to release his uberaffordable starburies. and comparing the two sneakers, one marbury tweet reads, jordan has been robbing the hood since kids dying for shoes and the only face he makes i don't care, times will change. ashley, this is an important story. ashley: it is, $15 as opposed to michael jordan's shoes that cost anywhere from 70 to $220. charles: right. ashley: and jordan, he says, has been robbing the hood and kids dying for shoes and the only face this dude makes is i don't care. it's very inflammatory. charles: it gets back we talk about how many mu

it was marbury v madison. marbury was one of those judges.asically, hesaid probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has provided for this goes beyond the power of congress. the authority of congress. so the supreme court was going to strike down that law. and this is something the court had never done before. congress an act of unconstitutional. >> that's tonight at 8:00 on c-span's q&a. on monday as the supreme court starts the new term, c-span debuts its new series, landmark cases. on the series premiere, we take a look at the real story behind the the famous marbury versus madison case. delving into the heated political battles between outgoing president john adams, thomas jefferson, and john marshall. established the court as the interpreter of the constitution. in his famous decision that he wrote, marbury versus madison. >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> joining the discussion, yale reed amar.khil and cliff sloan. liveark cases premier's this sunday at 9:00 p.m. eas

madison. >> marbury v. madison is probably the most famous case ever decided. >> joining the discussion, yale law school pref akeil reed and cliff sloan. landmark cases, exploring 12 supreme court rulings by revealing the life and times of the people who were the plaintiffs, lawyers and justices in these cases. landmark cases premiers live this monday at 9:00 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span 3 and c-span radio. and for background on heech case while you watch, order your copy of "landmark cases" companion book available for $8.95 plus shipping at cspan.org/landmarkcases. >>> the american bar association hosted its annual homeland security conference with dozens of legal and national security analysts. this panel discusses the role of the lawyer when it comes to emergency preparedness. they share their experiences handling the 9/11 attacks and the threat of ebola in the u.s. it's about an hour long. >>> the next topic is the very serious one which is going to be reflected upon by our panel. moderating that pan

his famous decision, he wrote marbury versus madison.smarbury versus madison probably due most famous case this court ever decided. joining, when marquesas, -- landmarkses cases premieres tonight at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span3 and c-span radio. for background on each case, order your copy of landmark cases companion book. it is available for a dollars $.95. $48.95. >> now a discussion on the agenda, including house leadership elections and congressional spending deadlines. from washington journal, this is about 40 minutes. american history tv and booktv. gail russell chaddock of the christian science monitor. welcome back. guest: thank you, steve. host: we are focusing on the election for the speaker of the house. what led to john boehner's decision to step down? he was looking at the very real possibility of being ousted as speaker. there had been pending for some weeks a motion to vacate the from and mounting anger the conservative wing of his party. and also a very real possibility that the government would shut down if there were

decision,marbury vs madison. >> landmark cases explores 12 supreme court rulings by revealing the life and times of the plaintiffs and justices and defendants in these cases. .t premieres next week for background on each case as you watch, order your copy of the companion book for $8.95 plus shipping. >> recently, american history tv society for historians of american foreign relations annual meeting in arlington. we spoke with professors and graduate students about research. this interview is about 15 minutes. >> cassandra good is the associated editor on papers of james monroe. she earned her doctorate at the university of pennsylvania. why is james monroe a significant player in american history? cassandra good: the first thing that people think of is the monroe doctrine, but he still has ramifications today, we joke that he is like forrest gump. he shows up everywhere. if you look at the painting of washington crossing the delaware, he is there. the louisiana purchase, he is involved. the war of 1812, he just gets his hand in so many moments in the first 40-50 years of the country.

versus maddon. >> marbury-madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decide. >> joining the discussion yale law school prefer akhil reed amar. landmark case, exploring 12 historic landmark rulings by exploring the life and times of the people who were the plaintiffs, lawyers and justices in these cases. "land mar cases" premiers live on c-span, c-span3 and c-span radio. and for background on each case while you watch, order your copy of landmark cases companion book. it's available for $8.95 plus shipping at c-span.org/landmark cases. >>> latvian president raimonds vejonis doesn't have experience with refugee and ask asking for help. last week they agreeing to accept 531, more than twice the number it's accepted since the country restored independence in 1991. from the national press club, this is about an hour. >> it's such an honor to speak here. you all are such a great audience. this is first time for me with such audience. i will try to do the best. what we are

marbury was one of those judges. that het said basically probably deserves some remedy, but the remedy that congress has beyondd for this goes the power of congress, the authority of congress. the supreme court was going to strike down that law. this is something that the court declaringdone before, an act of congress unconstitutional. >> that is tonight at 8:00 .astern and pacifi on monday, c-span debuts its new series, "landmark cases." on the series premiere, we take a look behind the real story of ,he marbury versus madison case and the battle between thomas jefferson and john marshall. >> john marshall established the court as the interpreter of the constitution and a famous marbury that he wrote, versus madison. >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous case that the court decided. , revealingases the life and times of the people who were the plaintiffs, lawyers, and justices in these cases. livemark cases" premieres monday on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. order your copy of the "lamb marquesas

versus madison. >> marbury and madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> joining the discuss, yale law school professor akehl reed amarch. landmark cases exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings by revealing the life and times of the people who were the plaintiffs, lawyers and justices in these cases. landmark cases premiers tonight on c-span, c-span3 and c-span radio. order your copy of landmark companion book for $8.95 plus shipping at c-span.org/landmarkcases. >>> the supreme court begins a new term today meeting for the first time since a number of high-profile decisions were announced back in june. cases this fall include whether a woman who lost her legs after she attempted to board a european train can sue an american court. affirmative action, union fees and juvenile sentences of life without parole. we heard more about the first day at the court and some of the term cases earlier this morning with a reporter on today's washington journal. >>> good morning to you. >> good morning. what actually happens on a first day of a new term? >> the first

we take a look at the famous marbury versus madison case, detailing the political battles thomas john adams, jefferson, and the newly appointed chief justice, john marshall. >> john marshall established the court as the interpreter of the constitution in his famous decision of >> marbury versus madison. versus madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> joined the discussion, a yellow author and professor -- a yale professor and author. exploring 12 supreme court rulings and the people affected by these cases. onight at 5 p.m. eastern c-span3 and c-span radio. of landmarkur copy cases companion book available for $8.95 plus shipping at www.c-span.org/landmarkcases. and just before "landmark ases" tonight on c-span, conversation about ending hunger around the globe. we will hear from prime minister tony blair and warren buffett. from the nation's capital at 7:30 p.m. right here on c-span. right now, today's press briefing with press secretary josh earnest. ernest: good afternoon -- press secretary ernest: good afternoon. i do not have any announcements, so we c

marbury versus madison establishes that, but it is also a great case that shows a personal story line the cases. there is a battle going on between john adams, thomas jefferson, and john marshall behind the story of this case. but theseal import, are also personal stories that are engaging, and illuminating. >> 9:00 p.m. monday night, tune in, c-span's "landmark cases." mark farkas, executive producer, appreciate it. leaders are, world in new york to speak at the opening of the united nations general assembly. israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu used the opportunity to argue against lifting sanctions against iran. his remarks are 40 minutes. . his remarks or 40 minutes. > ladies an prime minister netanyahu: ladies and gentlemen, i bring you greetings from jerusalem. the city in which the jewish people's hopes and prayers for peace for all of humanity have echoed throughout the ages. thirty-one years ago, as israel's ambassador to the united nations, i stood at this podium for the first time. i spoke that day against a resolution sponsored by iran to expel israel from the united

we take a look at the real story behind the famous marbury versus madison case, delving into the hated political battles between johning thomas adams -- adams, thomas jefferson and john marshall. >> john marshall established the court as the interpreter of the constitution in his famous decision he wrote of marbury for -- marbury v madison. >> it is probably the most famous case this car ever decided. >> joining the discussion, a schoolmoscow -- gail law professor. exploring 12 historic supreme court rulings. landmark cases premieres live this monday at 9:00 p.m. eastern on many happy returns 60 million join in our chorus to music o mamie with music to mamie with love ♪ >> mamie eisenhower new how to manage a staff. her favorite color was pink, hich was in her wardrobe and accessories. mamie eisenhower this sunday night at 8:00 eastern on c-span's original series, "first ladies, influence and image." looking at the private lives of women who influenced the presidency and the white house. on american history tv on c-span3. >> immigration officials testified at a senate hearing to admit

you can go back to marbury versus madison. it is well established. any president has used executive power. the easy answer is if congress doesn't like it, pass a law. there's been criticism of president obama using executive power in immigration. the senate two yeared ago passed by a 2-1 region on comprehensive immigration bill. the president at this passed the house also and signed into law. the president would not be doing any executive power. a few in the tea party told the house they couldn't bring it up. even though it probably would have passed. it was never brought up. it has to be frustrating to a president. i still have to help run the country. they use the executive authority. again any time a president oversteps his authority, then the congress can pass a law. you haven't seen the congress -- the congress has talked about it a lot. especially those of the 40 or 50 that seem to be running for president this year will talk about that. i don't see passing a law to change what the president did. host: in our final two or three minutes that we