with marbury maybe the way i. want some of. my good i think about. it on it. so i was. going to. have a. long time to find. out. well that's a. good shooters. you. know. well. oh oh. it was the same need to know. how would. you. go oh my god that was until carrots worked out. a lot. thank you. so much was all of eleven. oh yeah. so these are the are we going to. find. someone you. know. oh. no you don't really know me and. you got some pictures here of. the bunch of those are teachers you know she's young well you know. how i know you love. this is i'm going to take you through. your disability. you know it's a very thought i shall decide today i shall slow. walk home are. going to use. listen hard conquers the demo maybe it is it may look as good but it's too wet to the cd do you think to do with the music that they see. the possibility of each. other maybe a. little bit with you because i bet and think i said they know we're going to the new home i want to talk to. the okey dokey next. year yeah absolutely the. only thing cause you. know. that. was. jack. daniels would. be out

and this privilege dates all the way back to marbury v.adison, where chief justice marshall suggested that we really can't allow an invasion into the inner workings of the president and his cabinet. if you think about presidential privilege that way, it's much more cabinet, it's much more limited. so it's interesting to see where a court will go. the only real thing we know about executive privilege from the supreme court is that it exists. we don't really know the contours and extent of that privilege. >> it's vague. ashleigh, an appeals court in new york ruled that trump must answer civil charges filed by summer zervos, who accused the president of sexual misconduct. the editorial board at "the new york times" says, "the legal travails of president clinton may soon haunt president trump." ashleigh, can we expect a deposition from the president? and what happens if he resists? >> the president can be deposed in this case, and that's what the new york appellate court was saying. they were saying that just like president clinton had to stan

this seems like it is about government function as one could imagine if you go all the way back to marbury versus madison. it is a purely discretionary function for go. >> that is making lemonade out of lemons. but 22999 produced is less partisan than the one of the legislature. >> what i think is remarkable is actually on page 162 that if you run if you just use traditional principles 162 different maps that have the republican split.7 percent just to be clear. these are two different ways to get to the map. >> if you are 24000 maps to satisfy all the neutral criteria in your computer program don't you need a criteria to decide which of those 24000 maps you will choose and implicit in justice kagan's comment is the idea, is it not that you have to choose one that honors proportional representation that you have no other criteria to distinguish among the 24000 maps quick. >> and bare minimum. >> so let's go back you keep talking about representation but it is not because 99 percent of the time you get a map that is more fair to both parties than the one that was chosen. 's you could have 1