officers went to the marchant supermarket before midnight tuesday. they found a 22-year-old man bleeding from multiple stab witnesses said the 26 deer -- 26-year-old was involved and allowed altercation with the victim before he was stabbed. the victim was pronounced dead at the hospital earlier this morning. baltimore city police are warning of another craigslist robbery and the city. the latest incident happened monday night in the 1600 block of bolton street. a couple responded to a car at but the would-be seller pulled a gun and tried to rob the victims. the couple had their own gun and fought back as the woman fired shots into the air. >> there were two men wrestling on the ground and all of a sudden, this woman stepped back and pulled out a gun and started shooting them. there were two shots and the police were here right away. >> police arrested the victim on two weapons charges. the suspects got away unharmed and detectives are worried they will strike again. police believe december targeted that other potential car buyer a round the corner s

- in front of you, i guess my question is, is the act you are signing off on standard, a routine marchant instruction that happens? because the students do typical work throughout -- >> we are not prepared to answer that. we do not know the answer. commissioner mendoza: we are saying we can have an instructor that uncovered to link schools but we do not know the details of how that is going to happen. is that correct? is that correct? jerry, is that correct? somebody. >> i am bill sanderson, the executive director of curriculum. one of the things -- three years ago, we develop to the independence that the plan for the supervision of students that were in jrotc and that was worked on by the physical education group and the instruction. last year, and not to this past academic year, but the one before, we did some intensive professional development throughout the year. for jrotc and folks that were supervising the independent study program to help them with the implementation. that was the year before last. those are the specific kinds of activities that are out line. i do not have the inde

marchant, was touching on some of this. in your testimony you indicate that social security operations are currently adding to the unified federal deficit and will add stably more in the years to come -- add substantially more in the years to come. >> the parts of my answer that i think all analysts would agree with, and then i'll get into the parts where i think there's disagreement among analysts. i think that all analysts agree that to the extent that social security is supported by its own payroll tax revenue or by the taxation of benefits, to that extent it's not adding to the federal budget deficit. i think most analysts would also agree that to the extent that social security is receiving a subsidy from the general fund like the general fund transfers that accompany the payroll tax cut, that portion does add to the deficit. where you get into the murky area where analysts argue with each other has to do with the interest payments that are made to the social security trust i fund. right now to a very large extent, fro

marchant was attesting to some of this. you indicate social security operations are currently adding to the unified federal deficit and will add substantially more in the years to come. could you expand on that? >> perhaps the best way for many answer to this is to say the part of my answer that i think all animals would agree with and i will get to the part that there is disagreement among analysts. i think that all analysts agree that to the extent that social security is supported by its own payroll tax revenue or by the taxation of benefits to that extent is not adding to the federal budget deficit. i think most analysts would also agree that to the extent that social security is receiving a subsidy from the general fund or the general fund transfers the come from the payroll tax cuts, that portion does add to the deficit. where you get into the murky area where analysts argue with each other have to do with the interest payments that are made to the social security trust fund. right now, to a very large extent from now

marchant was touching on some of this.that in your testimony, you indicate the operations are currently adding to the unified federal deficit and will add substantially more in the years to come. could you expand on that? >> perhaps the best way to answer this is to say the price of my answer my answer that if they caught analysts would agree with anon delegate into the parts for this disagreement. i think that all analysts agree that to the extent to social security supported by a sub payroll tax revenue or private taxation of benefits, to that extent it is not adding to the federal budget deficit. most analysts also agree that to the extent that social security is receiving a subsidy from the general fund like the general fund transfers tax cut, that portion and i said to be devastated. where you get into the murky area for analysts argue with each other assiduity interest payments made to the social security trust fund. right now to a very large extent from outlook to 2033 and certainly into the 2020, social security su

we are one of the very few marchant states. we did not have the remote -- weezer -- we did not have the votes to do that in an international organization and get the support necessary for oil and gas to develop. the opponents argue -- after the u.s. obtains the louisiana territory, you really ought to basically get that money back from france or after we bought alaska, we ought to get that money back from russia. i negotiated debt deal and i am enormously proud that i have added resource jurisdiction to the u.s. that is at least double the size of the state of california. i believe the best testament in the long run is it will be larger than the louisiana purchase. we got it for a little bit. our industry has made it very clear that they cannot go out and develop that area and drill oil and gas. until we signed the treaty and move forward and get international recognition. that is what we want. host: off of twitter -- guest: the only time the treaty was rejected by a president of the u.s. was not really rejection of the conclus

marchant was touching on some of this. but in her testimony, you indicate the social security operations are currently adding to the unified federal deficit will add substantially more in the years to come. can you expand on that? >> perhaps the best way to answer is for me to say the parts of my answer that all analysts would agree with and then i get into the part that there's disagreement among analysts. i think all accounts agree to the extent that social security supported by some peril tax revenue or profit taxation of benefits to that extent is not adding to the federal budget deficit. most analysts would also agree that to the extent that social security is receiving subsidy from the general fund, like the transfers that the payroll tax cut, that portion that is sent to deficit. we get into the murky word analyst area has to do with the interest payments that are made to the social security trust fund. right now to a very large extent from now a new 2033 and certainly into the 2020, social security will access to l