here to walk us through it as always marcia coyle of the national law journal. now, mars ya, the first case involved the nfl. contracts to provide hats, t-shirts, jersey, that kind of thing. what kind of relief was american needel looking for. what did they argue in their original case? >> well, american needle had sued the nfl and its 32 teams claiming that they violated the federal anti-trust laws when they granted an exclusive licence to reebok to manufacture and sell trademarked head quarter-- head ware for the nfl teams. so american needle was asking the supreme court, because it had lost in the lower court, to find that the nfl did not have immunity from the federal anti-trust laws. >> suarez: so american needle wanted the nfl to act like 32 separate companies instead of one company. >> that's right. american needle had been selling trademarked headwear for something, i think, close to 40 years as were other vendors. so it was saying, basically, this was a very anti-competitive arrangement that the nfl had come up with reebok. >> suarez: so what did the ju