, as it considered three cases challenging laws of this sort, in north dakota and minnesota.in marcia coyle"national law journal" was in the courtroom, as always, and she joins me now. so, what's the hassle in getting a swawrpt before you do one of these tests? >>es well, if you are asking the states of north dakota and minnesota, who are involved in this, they say that, one, you don't have magistrates available 24/7 to answer a police officer's call for a warrant.nt it can take a while.hi there are concerns about, you know, evidence being lost.t. but basically, the states are saying here, look, states have a bargain with drivers. driving is not a right. it's a privilege. and when you get your license, you're agreeing-- you're impliedly consenting to certain requirements. and the states feel-- these states-- there are 12 of them now and the federal government-- impose criminal penalties if you refuse it take these tests. >> sreenivasan: so if you-- is there a distinction between the tests, the field sobriety test versus a blood test?e >> during the arguments today t that really did come out