could you say a little about your conversations with him and also about his father marcus raskin them also written about? >> certainly. jamie raskin is remarkable historical figure in and of himself. i think certainly his speech at the close of tuesday's presentation where he spoke about his personal experience was so powerful that my sense is it will go down in history as one of the great speeches -- not merely in impeachment trial, but in the history of congress. jamie raskin is a congressman from maryland. before that, was a longtime constitutional law professor. you of this remarkable circumstance of a constitutional law professor actually at the center of a great constitutional moment. beyond that, jamie raskin, as people who followed the trial no, had a horrible tragedy of the suicide of his and on new year's eve. he spoke about that and connected his own personal story, bringing his daughter and his son-in-law on january 6 to the capital, being separated from them, in his comments. he has a remarkable ability to weave the personal and the political. i think that does loop back

my late father marcus raskin once wrote, democracy needs a ground to stand upon with that ground to the truth, america needs the truth about ex-president trump's roll in inciting the insurrection on january 6 because it threatened our government and disrupted and easily could have destroyed the peaceful transfer of power in the united states for the first time in 233 years. it was suggested yesterday by president trump's counsel that this is really like a very bad accident or a natural disaster where lots of people get injured or killed and society is just out looking for someone to blame and that's natural and normal human reaction according to president's council but he said that's totally unfair in this case. president trump, according to mr. castor essentially as an innocent bystander who got swept up in this catastrophe but did nothing wrong. in this assertion, mr. castor unerringly echoes his client, president trump, who declared after the insurrection that his conduct in the affair was totally appropriate. and therefore we can only assume he could do and would do the exact same t

my late father marcus raskin wrote democracy needs the ground to stand upon and that ground is the truthamerica needs the truth without x president trump's role inciting the insurrection of january 6 because he threatened our government and it disrupted in easily could've destroyed the peaceful transfer of power in the united states for t the firt time in 233 years. it was suggested yesterday by presidentit trump's counsel that this is really a very bad accident or naturalnt disaster. where lots of people get injured or killed in society, just out looking for someone to blame and that is a natural and normal human reaction according to the president's counsel but he said it's totally unfair in this case. president trump according is an innocent bystander who got swept up in this catastrophe that did nothing wrong and in this assertion mr. castor echoed his clients ex-president trump who declared after the insurrection his conduct in the affair was totally appropriate. and therefore we can only assume that he could do and would do the exact same thing again because he said his conduct was

my late father marcus raskin once wrote, democracy needs a ground to stand upon, and that ground is thes the truth about ex-president trump's role in inciting the insurrection on january 6th because it threatened our government, and it disrupted, it easily could've destroyed the peaceful transfer of power in the united states for the first time in 233 years. it was suggested yesterday by president trump's counsel that this is really like a very bad accident or a natural disaster where lots of people get injured or killed, and society is just out looking for someone to blame. and that's a natural and normal human reaction according to president's counsel. but he says it's totally unfair in this case. president trump, according to mr. castor, is essentially an accident bystander who got swept up in this catastrophe but did nothing wrong. in this assertion, mr. castor unerringly echos his client ex-president trump who declared after the insurrection that his conduct in the affair was totally appropriate. and therefore we can only assume he could do and would do the exact same thing again b

my late father marcus raskin once wrote, "democracy needs a ground to stand upon, and that ground is the truth." america needs the truth about ex-president trump's role in inciting the insurrection on january 6th because it threatened our government and it disrupts, easily could have destroyed, the peaceful transfer of power in the united states for the first time in 233 years. it was suggested yesterday by president trump's counsel that this is really like a very bad accident or a natural disaster where lots of people get injured or killed and society is just out looking for someone to blame, and there's a natural and normal human reaction according to president's counsel. but he says it's totally unfair in this case. president trump, according to mr. castor, is essentially an innocent bystander who got swept up in this catastrophe but did nothing wrong. in this assertion, mr. castor unerringly echoes his client, ex-president trump, who declared after the insurrection that his conduct in the affair was totally appropriate. and therefore we can only assume he could do and would do th