just enough time to let you know that argentina and paraguay, in their cobra marek up much are currentlyafter losing theirfirst win looking for a first when after losing their first win goalless. —— copella americana. you can get all the latest sports news at our website hello there. the recent warm, humid, thundery, weather across the south—east was just a little taster of what perhaps might be a bit more widespread across the uk as we head on into next week. more on that in the moment. this is the thundery front which brought those downpours to the far south—east recently, low pressure will be more the dominant feature as we had through thursday. and that will feed in some showers maybe to northern and western areas early on this morning. and also a cooler west or north—westerly wind. so it will be a fresher start to the day this morning, most noticeably across the south—east. at least largely dry with some sunshine. and today, in fact, will be a day of sunny spells and scattered showers. these heaviest and most frequent across northern and western areas. it will be quite blustery as w

enter allergan r, the marek of botox. there wrinklement worth $3.5 billion a year. they also sell drugs for bipolar disorder a women's health. last year l aratisse and cool sculpting. the company raised eyebrows o wall street piper jaffray called it anex nsive price for a question bable as. >> seth:. they are paying $63 billion in stock. that doesn't include more than $20le billion in an's debt. >> the premium was a lot to where the stock has been training and the stocks rm underpeed a lot. >>> while $63 billion is a lot, it's less than the 160 billion that pfizer agreed to pay for dlergan in 2015. in al to move allergan to ireland. that deal was scuttled by a change in ta drules. avi'seal for allergan brings it back. wells fargo analyst said it's not the type of deal that excites investors. >> there are two types of pharma deals. we're we hind in scien and we need to buy the newest science. those are a lot of tech deals then there's the i have something wrong going wrong in a few yeand i should fill in this hole or try to augment of diversify away from this prb and

. >> was marek string involved? >> are you referring to our legal advisor? >> at the time of the drafting, was marek stream, at that time, he was deputy assistant secretary of state. >> congressman, i am not going to talk about individuals in the department in the interagency. >> but he works for you. >> there are hundreds of people in our bureau. >> but on may 23, he word for you. was he a lawyer in your department during that time? >> he is a lawyer in our department. >> what he's, was he a lawyer at that time? i understand that was not his position. what position does mr. string hold now? >> mr. string is our legal advisor. >> right. so, his legal advisor to the department of state, he is the top lawyer at the state department. and he is in the acting capacity. when was that transition announced? >> i don't remember. but i could tell you that he is not the only lawyer in the department. >> he is the top lawyer in the department. >> that is correct. but he is one person. >> that transition, my understanding is that was announced may 24 per an email from th

. >> woodruff: marek, is th clarity in the administration's approach to iran? >> no. no, there isn't, judy. the old saying in washington is if you want people in on a rocky landing, make sure they're on bod for the takeoff. going back to george h.w. bush, who was probably the model in this regardyou know, he got his position ratified by the united nations secur and approved by democratic house and a democratic senate, so that there was a sense of what our objective was, what -- why the force was being applied, and h that the been an international effort to enlist support, a successful one. all of that is missing here, judy, and, so, as ase conence, i think, as david said, both turiosity, anxiety and jus tension. >> and tactics are sort of driving strategy. so we have accidentally walke into thissition where we've drawn a red line where pompeo said you cannot kill americans, and if you do that, sudenly, u know, things change radically. so that's a red line. so if they do end up killing americans accidentally or on purpose, then what happens? and if you don't have the o

the republicans who made it possible for elena kagan to go on the court would bend and vote to mutt marek garland on the court. thehe took the second course and i can criticize him for it at all. joan: how would the current justices fades out, and why 18 years? bob: it could be 15 years. when john roberts was in the government, he wrote a memorandum on the question of term limits for judges. not sure it went to the supreme court. it was term limits. he suggested 15 years might be a term. it was a proposal that he was evaluating. 15 or 18 there is a particular magic there. was evaluating. the notion would be again, each limit would be 18 as current members of the supreme court would come to the conclusion of the terms they would become a senior associate justices and they would continue to have a role. they could sit on lower court decisions and periodically if there were vacancies on the united states supreme court come back up and sit on those cases. but the freshly appointed judges i think it would play out in the first and third year of an administration, would only serve for 18 years.