helen: the queen and maria altmann? yes. y both have a sense -- maria more than the queen may be, a sense of refinement and elegance, and self-discipline. and fierce and is. maria may be more than elizabeth. i think there are similarities. maria would have made a great claim. -- great queen. charlie: they both know who they are. helen: yes. very different because maria was ripped away from her roots, her memories, her youth. maria altmann had her youth taken away by the nazis. and indeed her family and her memories. that is why this klimt painting was so important. it represented family and memories. the queen of the united kingdom is exactly where she was born where she grew up charlie:. but she knows who she is, and she knows the role she has inherited. helen: absolutely. yes. that fell upon her in a way she inherited it. she wasn't born to be the queen. she was born to be the queen's niece. charlie: her father's brother was supposed to be the king. helen: exactly. her uncle abdicated. suddenly she is in the spotlight. char

in 1998, a woman named maria altmann, who's played by helen mirren, decided that she was going to sueff of the wall of her home by the nazis in the 30s. and it's a true story about -- she and this young lawyer, who i play, who took this fight all the way through the supreme court and beyond into austria and had fought to get this painting back. and there was so much more associated with the painting than just value. it was her family -- lost her whole family and her friends and her life. yeah, it's an incredible story. >> jimmy: it's a beautiful movie. we have a clip. here's ryan reynolds in "woman in gold." take a look at this. >> we're very sensitive to the government's concerns, mr. chief justice. the "can of worms" argument. but each country is different and poses different conditions. unlike, say, cuba, in austria's case, there's a treaty. so there's no dispute as to what type of law could apply. we recommend opening the can and extracting just the one little worm with a pair of tweezers, and then quickly closing it shut again. the defendants in this case have continuously tried