marija: a good question.constructive for risk markets this year, mainly because everybody else was so pessimistic. our view was yes, things are bad, but not terrible. that was enough to get some strong returns in pretty much any asset you look across. that is probably bubblelike territory. are we going to burst? i would probably venture to say yourcentral banks -- so question yesterday, what markets should be thankful for his central bank liquidity. it is very hard to see that going away anytime soon. we probably are in a bubble. is this bubble going to burst anytime soon? hopefully not. francine: so central bank support, what does that mean for dollar? does it strengthen from here? jeremy: i think that central bank support is very important. going into december, 2018, we saw the question of central bank liquidity being thrown into the market. i think in the context of essential bank liquidity, if you transpose that into 2020, we could well start to see an excess of supply of dollars in the market. if we see

marija buric, secretary-general of the council of europe, thank you for coming in very much. shift our attention to turkey. that country has started to put in people it believes to be foreign militants. a family suspected of supporting the so-called islamic state arrived in berlin on thursday. turkey said it will deport 23 more european nationals in the coming days. reporter: seven members of the same family arrived back in berlin after a visit to turkey. they traveled there in january and were arrested shortly afterwards. back in germany, they were met by the police. the turkish government claims they were intending to travel on hysteria, but there is no proof of that. it is known that some family members were involved with the islamist movement in their hometown in germany, and may have sympathized with the so-called islamic state. that in itself is not a crime. one son is said to have been a member of the german islamic circle, which is led by a radical cleric and was banned at two years ago. it is not clear what will happen to the family who are not facing arrest. >> we h

so his tweets when marija jovanovic was giving evidence, the former ambassador to ukraine.ou know, this woman has been a disaster wherever she has gone. as she was giving evidence this week. we have a president that is not a politician for the first time in our history, really. he is a guy that likes to speak his mind whether it hurts him helps him and i think sometimes it hurts him when he does that but he likes to do it was up people forget he tweeted about the bidens before that phone call with zelensky. he actually talked to the press and said some of this needs to be investigated. it wasn't he was doing it surreptitiously. so in his mind, i have known the man for many yea rs, mind, i have known the man for many years, i've never known him to want to break the law. i can't believe it for a second he would get on a phone call with ten people listening, as was the case with zelensky, and try to imply that somehow he was breaking the law or suggesting that laws should be broken. maybejust didn't know what the legal limitations of his office are. well, i believe, you know,

marija jovanovic —— marie yovanovitch said his government had been manipulated by corrupt foreign interestsshington. this was devastating and powerful testimony in what turned out to be a day of edge of your seat drama. the us ambassador to ukraine, marie yovanovitch, thrust into the centre of a poisonous brew. she fell foul of a diplomatic back channel set up by donald trump's personal lawyer, rudy giuliani, and was fired without warning. the smears against her were all untrue, but in thejuly 25 call between donald trump and his ukrainian counterpart, astonishingly, the us president attacked her. the former ambassador from the united states, "the woman," "was bad news." "well, she's going to go through some things." so, what did she think when she learned of this a couple of months back? iwas... shocked and devastated that i would feature in a phone call between two heads of state in such a manner, where president trump said i was "bad news" to another world leader and that i would be "going through some things." it was a terrible moment. then, while she was giving evidence, and unbeknown

impeachment proceedings and in the witness box, as it were, the ambassador to the ukraine —— ukraine, marijaand told to leave the ukraine on the first available plane and her security was at risk. it was a com plete security was at risk. it was a complete mystery to her as to why her security was at risk. she was chucked out of herjob and most remarkable doing this hearing, when this woman was offering startling allegations about this smear campaign conducted by the white house against their own ambassador in the ukraine, the most startling of all was the revelation that while she was giving evidence, trump was treating negatively against her saying everything this woman does terms too bad. look at somalia. as though somalia was her fault. as they what happened there was her fault stopped it was interpreted by the chairman of the committee, quite properly in my view, as an attempt to intimidate a witness. i'm just going to take the last sentence of the street, quoting directly. "it is aus the street, quoting directly. "it is a us president's absolute right to appoint ambassadors". of course