e , of course, this is not marina abramovic, but she did not have the opportunity to rise to such power and comprehend her own work, but women could not get an education at the end of the 19th century. that is, we see a thirst for knowledge. she reads a lot of books and knows languages. some classical texts are melting in the original, but nevertheless we understand that she is deprived of a systemic education and she feels it, and despite the fact that she reads very a lot of. uh, well, her possibilities and tools of reflection are quite limited, because after all, this is what education gives us, and she goes in a naive way, but in an intuitive intuitive way, but nonetheless. it seems to me that some kind of vague idea of what the main object of art is. it's not even her diary. these are not her paintings, but she herself, he can be traced, and she is gradually moving towards this is another matter , which is the saddest thing after all, we can never understand the story until we read it to the end, in general, peter brooks has, well-known a book, a religion on a photo board, and he