couples not being together who have kids together 40% of kids in this country are born outside the marital union. it's not that in 40% of the cases the partner would be violent or abusive. we are so far beyond extreme cases that we have to ask the question how we gone so far that maybe these partnerships would not have been gloriously happy or the parents would not be phenomenally in love like every day that may be the stability and additional resources will be beneficial to kids. that's a difficult conversation to have. nobody likes a question individual freedom and choices in pursuit of happiness somebody has to be thinking about the kids and in some sensibly see that kids do better when they haveet two parents stably together. except in these situations where it's clearly a harmful or extreme case and then the kids do better when the second parent is not an household. >> yes absolutely i fully agree 40% of my biological sets are not terrible parents open to debate with the other percent. [laughter] >> somewhere between zero and theree be wide disagreement whih end it's closer too. >> right. t

i mean, 40% of kids in this country are born outside of a marital union. it's not that. and 40% of those cases, the partner would be violent or abusive. right. we're so far beyond extreme cases that we have to ask the question, have we gone so far that maybe partnerships wouldn't have been gloriously happy or, you know, the parents be phenomenally and silently in love, like every day. but maybe that stability in additional resources be beneficial to kids. and i think you know that's a difficult conversation to have and nobody you know likes to question individual freedom and choices in of happiness and i would just somebody has to be thinking about the kids right and in some sense like we see that kids do better when they have two parents stable together except in these situations where it's very a harmful or extreme case and then and then the kids do better when that second parent isn't in the household. yep, absolutely. i, i fully agree that 40% of my of my biological sex are not terrible parents open to debate about the what the right person. yeah. however, it is prob

i mean, 40% of kids in this country are born outside of a marital union. it's not that. and 40% of those cases, the partner would be violent or abusive. right. we're so far beyond extreme cases that we have to ask the question, have we gone so far that maybe partnerships wouldn't have been gloriously happy or, you know, the parents be phenomenally and silently in love, like every day. but maybe that stability in additional resources be beneficial to kids. and i think you know that's a difficult conversation to have and nobody you know likes to question individual freedom and choices in of happiness and i would just somebody has to be thinking about the kids right and in some sense like we see that kids do better when they have two parents stable together except in these situations where it's very a harmful or extreme case and then and then the kids do better when that second parent isn't in the household. yep, absolutely. i, i fully agree that 40% of my of my biological sex are not terrible parents open to debate about the what the right person. yeah. however, it is prob

being together that have kids together , i mean 40% of kids in the country are born outside of the marital union. and in 40% of those cases, it is not that the partner is violent or abusive. we are so far beyond extreme cases that we have to ask the question, have we gone so far that maybe these partnerships would not have been gloriously happy or the parents wouldn't be phenomenally and obediently in love every day but maybe the stability and resources would be beneficial to kids. nobody likes to question individual freedom and pursuit of happiness. and 70 has to be thinking about the kids, right and in some sense, we see that kids do better when they have two parents stably together. except in these situations where it is very clearly a harmful or extreme case and then the kids do better when the second parent is not in the household. >> i fully agree that 40% of my biological sets are not terrible parents. >> probably somewhere between 0-40. and there would be wide disagreement about which end it is closer to. >> this brings us a little bit to the question of men and of boys. i think your boo

40% of these kids in the country are born outside the marital union. it is not that in 40% of those cases that the partner would be violent or abusive, right? and that we are so far beyond the extreme cases that we will have to ask that question, have we gone so far that maybe these partnerships, they wouldn't have been gloriously happy. maybe that stability, it would be beneficial to kids and that it is a difficult decision to have. nobody would like to question the individual freedom and the choices in the pursuit of happiness. i would just, somebody has to be thinking about the kids, right? and that in some sense, we will see that they will do better when they have two parents, stabilizing together, then the kids will do better when they are not in that household. >> absolutely. and i fully agree that 40% of my biological sectors are not terrible parents. open to debate what the right percentage is. >> yeah right? it is probably somewhere between zero to 40 and wide disagreements on which end they are closer to. >> right. this will bring us the ques