mark davis of the sub—postmasters. to determine how the details of what has been called an aggressive media strategy. that strategy also impacted the bbc�*s and reporting. in 2015 eight panorama documentary on the scandal featured a fugitive whistle—blower who repealed the ability to remotely access these projects without sub—postmasters even knowing it. that is important information because it is important evidence in clearing the sub—postmasters from the scandal and returning their good names. lawyers for the post office threatened to sue panorama and mark davis who was appearing to at the inquiry escalated the matter to senior bbc managers. it didn't cancel the programme altogether but it did delay it by several weeks. that was a small victory that the inquiry was celebrated inside the post office. paula vennells at the time the chief executive even e—mailed mark davis to congratulate him and his team on their extensive work on the matter. mark davis for his part has told panorama through his lawyers that he acted i

i’m to do with legal matters from mark davies. �* ,., to do with legal matters from mark davies. �* , of you. let's see what _ davies. i'm so sorry, i spoke of you. let's see what the - davies. i'm so sorry, i spoke of you. let's see what the it - davies. i'm so sorry, i spoke of i you. let's see what the it person was telling — you. let's see what the it person was telling you on what to do about looking _ was telling you on what to do about looking at _ was telling you on what to do about looking at possible miscarriages of justice _ this is a separate chain, remembering that mark davies had 'ust remembering that mark davies had just replied to you. this is leslie saul's _ just replied to you. this is leslie saul's reply to your e—mail setting out your— saul's reply to your e—mail setting out your proposals. she does include everyone _ out your proposals. she does include everyone on— out your proposals. she does include everyone on the chain and doesn't cut people — everyone on the chain and doesn't cut people out. paula, just a couple of thoughts. if we state we will review — of t

ok, let's listen back to mark davies - themselves this time.isten back to mark davies who | themselves this time. ok, let's i listen back to mark davies who is giving evidence at the moment. everybody at the post office when we read that e—mail was deeply, deeply shocked and the number —— a number of conversations took place outside of conversations took place outside of e—mail about it. the natural human instinct of every person who heard about that story was to be deeply, deeply shocked. in terms of specialist media lawyer, my role within the post office was to be the communications director and there was a very strong likelihood of communications media coverage in relations to the spread —— in relations to the spread —— in relation to this tragic case. and i was very conscious of the media guidelines around reporting of suicide or is it appeared in this case attempted suicide. and i wanted to make sure we had somebody on hand who could give guidance about those matters. ., , ., , ., ., matters. there was a lining up of a secialist matters. t

the inquiry heard from mark davies last week, i think, inquiry heard from mark davies last week, ithinkned, and that was my understanding at the time, that what he was trying to do was minimise misinterpretation. it was minimise misinterpretation. it was wrong, because clearly, if all past cases needed investigating the needed investigated, but at the time that wasn't what the post office thought. i think what he was trying to do here was to minimise misinterpretation and exaggeration in the media. d0 misinterpretation and exaggeration in the media-— misinterpretation and exaggeration in the media. do you agree that his first oint in the media. do you agree that his first point says. _ in the media. do you agree that his first point says, you _ in the media. do you agree that his first point says, you should - in the media. do you agree that his first point says, you should make i in the media. do you agree that his first point says, you should make a| first point says, you should make a decision— first point says, you should make a decision about the extent to which you review— decisio

at the post office inquiry, the business's former communications director mark davies has been askede acting in good faith with the information they had at the time. our business correspondent emma simpson is following the inquiry, in central london. yes, mark davies was the big pr boss as the post office went into full crisis mode, in charge of an aggressive media strategy, especially when it came to the bbc. he was shown several of his internal e—mails, where he described journalists as campaigning, having an agenda, publishing garbage, some of them he admitted looks ludicrous, with the benefit of hindsight today. had you ever asked yourself, "might we be in fact the baddies?" i've asked myself that question, i've asked myself many, - many questions over this issue many, many, many times over the course i of the last few months, - over the course of the last few years, and throughout the whole period thatl i was dealing with these issues, we really believed we were - doing the right things. mr davies told the inquiry he never sought to mislead, never sought not to tell the truth. "

_ between you and jane mcleod, mark davies and _ between you and jane mcleod, mark davies and alistairstions _ you say, "i have listed below some questions and requests." and then, in the _ questions and requests." and then, in the second paragraph, you say," as my— in the second paragraph, you say," as my earlier— in the second paragraph, you say," as my earlier note, our priority is to protect — as my earlier note, our priority is to protect the business and the thousands who operated under the same _ thousands who operated under the same rules and did not get into difficulties." can you see that? yes, _ difficulties." can you see that? yes. i— difficulties." can you see that? yes. i can _ difficulties." can you see that? yes, ican. by difficulties." can you see that? yes, i can. by this stage, as i yes, ican. by this stage, as i think— yes, i can. by this stage, as i think we _ yes, i can. by this stage, as i think we are going to see, august 2015. _ think we are going to see, august 2015. the — think we are going to see, august 2015, the post office and you personally were aware of

to mark davies and lesley saul, urgent, accessing horizon.mail in the chain. "dear bowes, your help please in answers and in facing those answers in preparation for the select committee. one, is it possible to access the system remotely? we are told it is. " what you are doing there is attributing to the committee a statement or a challenge or a question, is that right? challenge or a question, is that riuht? . . challenge or a question, is that riuht? , . . right? yes, i am positing a question- _ right? yes, i am positing a question. imagining - right? yes, i am positing a question. imagining that l right? yes, i am positing a - question. imagining that which they ma ask question. imagining that which they may ask you? _ question. imagining that which they may ask you? yes. _ question. imagining that which they may ask you? yes. and _ question. imagining that which they may ask you? yes. and asking - question. imagining that which they may ask you? yes. and asking for. may ask you? yes. and asking for assistance — may ask you? yes. and askin

the inquiry heard on the seventh of july 2013 the post office pr director mark davis sent paul of theemail advising her how to respond to the findings of the forensic accountant report. that came from second site. they had identified the software bugs in the horizon i.t. system data from which they used data to prosecute hundreds of sub postmasters. in the email, mr. davis said if we say publicly that we will look at past cases, we will open this up very significantly to front page news. it would have he said a ballistic impact. she replied i will take your steers. suggesting she put the reputation of the post office ahead of the concerns of the campaigner which counselor jason beard challenged her own. >> you did take the advice of the pr guide, didn't you? >> i really don't remember it relating to the decision. >> hang on please. >> the email you had sent to which this is a response posits should we look back 12, 20 months in separation or should we go back further? why aren't we going back further five to 10 years? and this says you cannot do that. you will be on the front page. th

mark davies. the pr guy. he says, wise advice with which i agree.

, the pr response, heragreeing of controlling the narrative, the pr response, her agreeing with mark davies do with those decisions and again she denied she was shielding the board from any of this information. this is only day two. it of this information. this is only da two. , of this information. this is only da two. , ., ., of this information. this is only da two. ., , ., day two. it is and of course on day one all those _ day two. it is and of course on day one all those sub-postmasters i day two. it is and of course on day l one all those sub-postmasters have one all those sub—postmasters have been waiting so long to hear from her and they would have been there again today. what are the sorts of things they have been saying? thea;r things they have been saying? they kee sa in: things they have been saying? they keep saying the _ things they have been saying? tue: keep saying the same things they have been saying? tte: keep saying the same thing, things they have been saying? t"te:1: keep saying the same thing, that they cannot handle it when they see these witnesses what executives s

have seen a series of individual responses passed through the executive team, quite often with mark davis'sbe the right process that has been undertaken?— be the right process that has been undertaken? mark would have only added, as undertaken? mark would have only added. as he _ undertaken? mark would have only added, as he said _ undertaken? mark would have only added, as he said last _ undertaken? mark would have only added, as he said last week, - undertaken? mark would have only added, as he said last week, the l added, as he said last week, the communications all relate to that. i wouldn't _ communications all relate to that. i wouldn't have expected mark to get involved _ wouldn't have expected mark to get involved in — wouldn't have expected mark to get involved in the investigation of what _ involved in the investigation of what had — involved in the investigation of what had gone wrong. that was angela's — what had gone wrong. that was angela'sjob. can what had gone wrong. that was angela'sjob— what had gone wrong. that was antela's'ob. . ., ., , angela's “ob. can we move on pleas

the e—mails from mark davies and leslie saul are part of an iterative process as to how we took thisview was... i think i took as a piece of reassurance that the lawyers were doing what they needed to do in terms of what i... and i think this was at the stage of what i learnt about disclosure. of what i learnt about disclosure. of what they needed to do in respect of disclosure. what i didn't know at this stage, to be very clear, was that by dint of what had happen with garethjenkins, the post office had breached its duties i don't think that was mentioned to me at the time. , , ., . that was mentioned to me at the time. , _, . . , time. did you never at any time connect the _ time. did you never at any time connect the long-running - time. did you never at any time i connect the long-running criticism connect the long—running criticism of horizon's — connect the long—running criticism of horizon's integrity that had been forced _ of horizon's integrity that had been forced upon the post office by sub—postmasters for years and years with being _ sub—postmasters for years and years wi

so the inquiry heard that on the 7th of july 2013, the post office pr director, mark davis, sent paulnnells. from which they used data to prosecute hundreds of sub postmasters. in the e—mail, mr davis said, "if we say publicly that we will look at past cases, we will open this up very significantly to front page news. it would have a ballistic impact." she replied, "i will take that. " councillorjason be challenged her on this. ., . ~' councillorjason be challenged her on this. ., ., ,, ., . ., on this. you did take the advice of the pr guy. _ on this. you did take the advice of the pr guy. didn't _ on this. you did take the advice of the pr guy, didn't you? _ on this. you did take the advice of the pr guy, didn't you? i - on this. you did take the advice of the pr guy, didn't you? i really i the pr guy, didn't you? i really don't remember _ the pr guy, didn't you? i really don't remember it _ the pr guy, didn't you? i really don't remember it to _ the pr guy, didn't you? i really don't remember it to relating l the pr guy, didn't you? i really| don't remember it to relating to the de

raiders owner mark davis, saluting the man known as mr. raider as the sun sets on the raider nation. >> i'm here at allegiant stadium to light the al davis memorial torch in honor of and tribute to jim otto, the original raider. the entire raider nations thoughts and prayers go out to jim's wife, sally, and the entire otto family. jim, may you rest in peace >> now, years ago, i had a chance to spend some time with otto at his ranch up in auburn. he was raising llamas and other animals, and though he was in obvious pain, he never complained about any of that. and he told me he would not have changed a thing. he loved playing football and absolutely loved the raiders. he was something else. >> he was really, obviously very successful on the field. but he did well after football as well. in business. yeah very, very successful in terms of business owned a lot of fast food franchises. >> and if people drove up 8-80, they probably saw the billboard with this photo alongside interstate 80 as they headed up to the sierra advertising one of his bu

what we saw today was an e—mail from mark davis.n. in the e—mail he advised paula vennells that, if in response they were to review past prosecutions, it would, in his words, make front page news. he also added that in media terms it becomes mainstream, very high profile, to which paula vennells responded, you are right to call this out. i will take your spear. here are some of that exchange. our current approach would mean there is going to be some coverage but not very much — the usual suspects. if we say we will look back at past cases we will be on the front page. isn't he directly saying...? i can see that's what he is saying but my mindset at the time, when i received this, is that we were working on specific cases that were coming forwards and we opened up... no, no, no. hold on, ms vennells. the e—mail that you had sent, to which this is a response, posits, shall we look back 12—18 months in separation or should we go back further. yes. why aren't we going back further, five to ten years? and this says, you can't do that, yo

mark davies. the pr guy. he says, wise advice with which i agree. we move forwards, please, to 0011? sorry, for 029. and look at page two, please at the top. this is made 2016 from mr maccormack directly to you. he says a typical head in the sand reply from the team you have placed too much trust in. let me be clear, once the police investigation is completed, its highly likely that members of your staff will be sent to prison, a custodial sentence is mandatory for this offence. your role in this will not escape attention. call her and apologise and ensure suffering is ended as soon as possible. i wonder what kind of god you worship. what happened as a result of this being sent to you? i happened as a result of this being sent to you?— sent to you? i believe this is the one i referred _ sent to you? i believe this is the one i referred to _ sent to you? i believe this is the one i referred to earlier - sent to you? i believe this is the one i referred to earlier where i | one i referred to earlier where i ask, _ one i referred to earlier where i ask

i genuinely think mark davies, that was a _ genuinely think mark davies, that was a slip— genuinely thinkwrite. it. was triumphalist, wasn't it? i was very relieved _ was triumphalist, wasn't it? i was very relieved that _ was triumphalist, wasn't it? i was very relieved that it _ was triumphalist, wasn't it? i was very relieved that it perhaps - was triumphalist, wasn't it? i was very relieved that it perhaps wasn't as bad _ very relieved that it perhaps wasn't as bad as _ very relieved that it perhaps wasn't as bad as it— very relieved that it perhaps wasn't as bad as it could have been. and i'm as bad as it could have been. and i'm sorry. — as bad as it could have been. and i'm sorry, there is simply no excuse. _ i'm sorry, there is simply no excuse, because it wouldn't matter, would _ excuse, because it wouldn't matter, would it. _ excuse, because it wouldn't matter, would it, how bad it had been, because — would it, how bad it had been, because we were wrong? and i apologised early on to misses hamilton about not having known about _ hamilton about not having known about your prosecu

earlier today the inquiry was shown an e—mail by mark davies the head of pr at the post office who oversawells responded, i will take your stay. jason be credited to her that media should not be the concern here when it comes to these prior criminal convictions or possible miscarriages ofjustice. paula vennells insisted that despite how that e—mail read media outcomes didn't factor into a decision making. i believe the inquiry is still going on and we have come to her queue a lot more about this alleged cover—up so it's worth taking a listen. it would be sensible to tell alice first and — it would be sensible to tell alice first and she wondered if susan was overreacting and she could be right. she will— overreacting and she could be right. she will undoubtedly make the legal case against it and emotionally she might— case against it and emotionally she might throw in the towel if we press ahead _ might throw in the towel if we press ahead it _ might throw in the towel if we press ahead. it might also be a way of saying _ ahead. it might also be a way of saying she — ahead. it might also b

yesterday, the inquiry heard that on the 7th ofjuly 2013, the post office pr director, mark davies, senther how to respond to the interim findings of the forensic accountants' second sight, warning that if the post office looked at past prosecutions of subpostmasters, it would make front—page news with a ballistic impact. ms vennells replied, "i will take your steer." her email said the most urgent objective was to manage the media. the email that you had sent, to which this is a response, posits shall we look back 12 to 18 months since separation, or should we go back further? why aren't we going back further, five to ten years? and this says you can't do that, you'll be on the front page. that's a grossly improper perspective, isn't it? yes, it is, yes, it is. ahead of a crunch board meeting on the 16th ofjuly 2013, the post office's top lawyer, susan crichton, has testified that she told paula vennells about an expert witness in the trials whose evidence was unsafe and that subpostmasters could sue for malicious prosecution. but instead of being invited to brief the board, she told th

mark milley. instead, gordon davis, maj.rmy in retirement, using the example of the defense of kharkiv, indicates, from a military point of view, political limitations. i believe that this is an illogical political restriction that prevents the military from defending its territory from aggression. russia has the means of long-range damage, and unlike the east or south of ukraine, where these means are located on the occupied ukrainian territory, the situation with kharkiv, which is located on the border with russia, is completely different, so why hold back. systems, systems of long-range damage or destruction of air targets in russia, which strike on the ukrainian population or ukrainian troops, it makes no sense. for the full version of this story, see the page of voice of america in ukrainian on the youtube network, and also read this analysis on the website of voice of america. and we continue the issue: former hockey coach and public activist from canada paul huse has been helping ukrainians for more than two years, he

heard that on the 7th of - inquiry heard that on the 7th of july 2013 the post office pr director mark daviesostmasters, it would make front page news with ballistic impact. she replied, i will take your steer. an e—mail sent the most urgent objective was to manage the media. urgent ob'ective was to manage the media. ., ., , ., ., , media. the e-mail that you had sent, which this is — media. the e-mail that you had sent, which this is a — media. the e-mail that you had sent, which this is a response _ media. the e-mail that you had sent, which this is a response to _ media. the e-mail that you had sent, which this is a response to posit - which this is a response to posit should — which this is a response to posit should we — which this is a response to posit should we look at 12 months since separation — should we look at 12 months since separation or should we go back further? — separation or should we go back further? why are we not going back five to— further? why are we not going back five to ten— further? why are we not going back five to ten years? this is we can't do that— five to ten

mark: welcome back america here is one of article america's wiseman victor davis hanson for jumping onl commentators i bring on people who can help inform us about what is going on in this country. through a perspective of history or philosophy or economics victor davis hanson is the tip of the spirit is to brag about coming out tuesday, the end of everything. help warren descended to annihilation there's a live ancient history in here. for example he talks about the destruction of the aztec empire and so forth and so on. why is this important? these empires were also supposed to last forever. and they did not last forever. what happened? and is it happening to us today? victor davis hanson it's always an honor and pleasure to have you. this is a fantastic book. i learned more about ancient history than i could have imagined the end of everything and get this in amazon.com or any major bookstore. why did you write this book and hide how do you tight to the american republic today? >> wars usually end with a surrender or humiliation or defeat. every once in a while they end not just an

mark: hello america i am marco levin this is "life, liberty & levin" saturday per with two great guests we have leo to rell and victor davis before i get to them did you see president biden's speech the other day, if you blinked you probably missed it. not so much a speech kind of a statement. this man is so thoroughly pathetic. he has no moral center. he says that we believe in free speech and of course violence is not free speech so you kids behave yourself there. we can't have anti-semitism but we also could not have a slot a phobia and so forth and so on. so for his base probably good enough this will not go down as one of the great speeches in american history and this is exactly what we needed. it will not go down as a profile encourage because it's not what he is he has linguine for a spine. this man is truly pathetic. at a time when eat at great president, great statesman, great leader we do not have one. we have the exact opposite. here's the speech. absolutely useless. too little too late, joe. something's going on in this country how many news organizations have played for you what took place on october 7 we hav

really good way because and lanny davis, his attorney, says, we test if we tried the night before michael cohen blow a gasket when they were person at what jim jordan and markeadows would do. and lanny davis said, great if you do that, republicans will be high-fiving you tomorrow. it was a similar method today where where he was really trying to be calm. he was saying yes, ma'am. no, ma'am. he was looking at the jury. i mean, he was really trying to not be the boisterous michael cohen that you see on tiktok or on television? >> in extremely controlled especially for anyone who's dealt with michael cohen or seen him in interviews, he can be so bombastic can begin so reactive to what someone says and almost always wants to have the last word. and in this he is just tremendous control on his part of answering the questions even when todd blanche is going toe-to-toe with in parsing things, he is he is not raising his voice. he is answering the specific question. and at times he tried to add a little bit more to it and some blanche would punch back and say, that's not what i asked you, but he didn't take the bait and he didn't react in the way that i think a lot

badenoch, claire coutinho, mel stride , there's gillian mel stride, there's gillian keegan, mark harper, david daviesictoria prentice, esther mcvey, andrew mitchell and johnny mercer. they would all go to labour by the way. alex chalk and michael tomlinson would apparently both lose to the liberal democrats. ulster jack would lose to the snp and simon hart to plaid cymru, another big name would be sir jacob rees mogg . apparently he jacob rees mogg. apparently he would go as well. now a lot can change in politics. there are weeks to go in this election campaign and that poll was concluded on may the 27th. but those results are stark . i'm those results are stark. i'm joined now by the man behind the poll. it's the founder and ceo of electoral calculus, martin baxter. martin thank you very, very much for joining baxter. martin thank you very, very much forjoining us here on patrick christys tonight. those results are absolutely astonishing. can you shed some more light on them for us, please? >> good evening. patrick. yes indeed. these are disappointing results for the conservatives and very pleasing

make money from every state petitioner possible, and small-town hospital ceo pam davis looked like just another easy marks case, the whole shakedown process is recorded by the hospital executive who was getting shaken down. [laughs] woman: he needs to reset your wire. [laughs] oh, god, another wire. sorry for, uh... -i don't care. -just in here. uh, the governor really wasn't on my radar, um, at all until i experienced an extortion attempt through one of his, um, colleagues. pam's hospital system wanted to build a new facility in plainfield, illinois. seems pretty straightforward, but there were red flags right away when she went to get government approval for the project. davis: in my case, the governor had appointed individuals to this board who had either contributed money to his campaign, so they bought their way on, or individuals that were controlled by the governor and other individuals and would approve only those projects where a kickback was going to be given. turns out the board was willing to approve the hospital. all she had to do was use builders and lenders who were in their pocket and pad

the date marks national dog rescued a but on this day in 18, 73 levi strauss and jacob davis patented blue jeans in 1926. charles lindbergh takes off on the first solo nonstop transatlantic flight. and speaking about turning back time on may 20th the one and only share was born. in 1986. the flintstones 25th anniversary celebration aired on television. the legendary frank sinatra was laid to rest and the world's largest power station. the 3 gorges dam officially opened in china in 2006, the simpsons aired its 4 100th episode and award-winning host david letterman announced his retirement from late night tv after more than 30 years. >> i love david letterman and he still has like podcast interviews and stuff. speaking of big events because we're talking about what's going on this weekend with memorial day. well, there's carnival all in san francisco this weekend. so that's going to be huge. it's a two-day festival. there are 60 musical performances for that and it is a always a big party, a celebration of latin american and caribbean culture. and it's happening in the mission district.

mark cuban's cost plus company. it's 29 on annual disrupter 50 list. let's dive in further with ceo alicia bowler davis.atulations. >> hi, kelly. thanks for having us. we're really excited about being recognized for the the second year in a row. >> you have 25 years of gm, on the board at general mills, you were at amazon. how did you wind up at this startup online pharmacy as its ceo just for the past year or so? >> yeah. i joined in september of 2022. i was looking to have a larger impact and also had a lot of momentum. they're really known for challenging the status quo. that's what i've done throughout my career. i thought it was a great opportunity. i thought with my background and skills it was a great pairing so i jumped in and joined the company. >> so my kids are always getting strep throat or pinkeye or ear infection. i'm curious how my experienceover laps with what your customer base is looking for. we have to go through a doctor and point us to a prescription and go to the cvs up the road. what role does alto play in the process? >> so we're really working to improve cost, convenience and ca

marks. how does 0 london momma and how to much interest de b has been sworn in as chance present of to being the god winter of the elections held earlier this month. davy, it's of this into him president since 2021 of his father was killed by rebels. the opposition is alleged vote rigging and cold for the results of the election to be a now right now probably send these across cause dealing with extreme shortages of food, water, and fuel. but even before the war, as well as near to decade, brocade limited, the volume of goods allowed into the strip. recent months, the people of houser have been increasingly relying on don't key costs as a means of transportation and income. i'm the sausage reports it was once considered an outdated form of transport. now, the nor palestinians in jonesville are relying more and more on donkey carts. and here in han, eunice, people say it's become the only way left to get around. i am a volunteer at the european hospital. i am facing great difficulty finding a means of transportation to the medical facility. i need to get at least 2 rides in addition to walking 3 kilometers. not only is the journey fraught with danger, i

mark: if you're going to read anything and get a book i want you to get this but the end of everything how war descends into annihilation by victor davis get amazon.com right now any major bookstore comes out fresh off the press on tuesday morning. i read this book i learned a tremendous amount it is so compelling is very, very important. a couple quick questions here victor. how long did carthage survive before it was destroyed? >> 800 years, market. teams 1100 years, constantinople 1200 years. the aztec empire about 300 years. that is what was so fascinating. it all came to an abrupt end so quickly when they thought they were invulnerable given the longevity of the empire. mark: we are about 250 years we are not the same in america we were two years ago, five years ago 50 or 100 years ago is that correct? >> that is what is striking how quick the client comes because it is almost like the oral old hemingway it was gradually then suddenly bankruptcy that is what happens. it's gradually you don't detect it and then it just appears. you woke up about a year ago and decided what dhec happened to america? we did not realize it was acceler

marks the 19th fatal collision in san jose. this year there were 16 fatal traffic collisions at the same time last year. chemical workers at ucla and uc davis now on strike. they claim that their rights were violated by the university of california during recent pro-palestine protests. the strikes began last week at uc santa cruz have now have expanded to those 2 other campuses. the union representing teaching assistance tutors and researchers say the workers free speech rights were violated. when you see leaders called on police to remove the encampments. the university of california claims the walkouts ere illegal. in the east bay organizations calling for a cease-fire in the middle east, put together a vigil at the lake merritt amphitheater in oakland. last night's event was called all eyes on rafah. this follows an israeli airstrike that sparked a tent camp fire. and according to hamas, dozens of people were killed. it's unclear if that air strike caused the fire or if secondary explosions possibly from hamas weapons are to blame. israel's prime minister is calling this a tragic mistake investigation now underway and the u.s. is weighin

mark esper. >> thanks for being with us thanks, boris. >> of course. >> now to haiti, where to american missionaries have reportedly been shot and killed by gang members there, the family of davy and natalie lloyd say the couple was murdered last night at a home in port-au-prince davies parents ran the missionary company. the couple of worked for and the group posted pleas for help online while describing scenes of chaos in the hours leading up to their deaths. quote, davy and natalie lloyd were in my house using the starlink internet to call me. they are holed up in their the gangs have shot all the windows out of the house and continue to shoot their lives are in danger. please pray. >> the phones have all died, and i can't get a hold of anybody and quote cnn senior national correspondent david cova recently returned from haiti where he witnessed some of violence firsthand. >> david, what's your reaction to this news? >> i was just reading there some of that post that you had a boras and briana a few hours after that, they confirm that that couple along with a third person, according to sources familiar with the situation, was killed that third person is a haitian staff are

mark dolan tonight, a very busy show coming up. let me tell you. so many big issues to get through in the big story. is time running out for the conservatives we'll be joined by philip davies mp . is rishi sunak philip davies mp. is rishi sunak going to remain prime minister will debate all of that also in the big story as suella braverman says that she regrets supporting rishi sunak as leader and with dame andrea jenkins saying bring back boris should the tories have one more roll of the tories have one more roll of the dice and put someone new in charge? also tonight is britain an institutionally racist country? no go, says my mark meets guest tony sewell, a prominent man of colour in the house of lords, whose report on the issue saw him attacked, demonised and stripped of an honorary degree cancelled for having the wrong opinions. lord tony sewell joins me live shortly and looking forward to this in my take at ten, prince andrew needs to get his house in order as the £30 million royal lodge that he inhabits is falling apart. should king charles evict his own brother? my charles evict his own brother? my verdict at ten. two hours of big opinion, big debate and big entert

mark dolan tonight, a very busy show coming up. let me tell you. so many big issues to get through in the big story. is time running out for the conservatives we'll be joined by philip daviess rishi sunak going to remain prime minister will debate all of that also in the big story as suella braverman says that she regrets supporting rishi sunak as leader and with dame andrea jenkins saying bring back boris should the tories have one more roll of the tories have one more roll of the dice and put someone new in charge? also tonight is britain an institutionally racist country? no go, says my mark meets guest tony sewell, a prominent man of colour in the house of lords, whose report on the issue saw him attacked, demonised and stripped of an honorary degree cancelled for having the wrong opinions. lord tony sewell joins me live shortly and looking forward to this in my take at ten, prince andrew needs to get his house in order as the £30 million royal lodge that he inhabits is falling apart. should king charles evict his own brother? my charles evict his own brother? my verdict at ten. two hours of big opinion, big debate and big entertainment. big opinion, big debate and big

davies. sir phil, great to have you on the show. how do you interpret those results, particularly the blackpool south by—election and the loss of andy street in the west midlands? yeah, look , mark mark, the fact of the matter is let's not beat about the bush. >> we got a good kicking in the in the local elections and in the by—election and the public basically wanted to give us a kick in. they basically wanted us, wanted us to know that they're not happy, they're frustrated, they're frustrated about what's happening with particularly with, immigration, legal immigration, illegal immigration. and they wanted to us know that in no uncertain terms. and, you know, any any politician who fails to heed what the public are saying to them, is stupid. and so i think we should all acknowledge that the public gave us a kick in. we understand that they're frustrated, and we've got to redouble our efforts to come out fighting and make sure that we win back people's trust. but we're not going to do that unless we, first of all, accept that people did give us a kick in if this was a football team. >> philip, the fans would be calling for a new manager with nothing to lose. why don't the torie

mark dolan tonight, a very busy show coming up. let me tell you. so many big issues to get through in the big story. is time running out for the conservatives we'll be joined by philip davies remain prime minister will debate all of that also in the big story as suella braverman says that she regrets supporting rishi sunak as leader and with dame andrea jenkins saying bring back boris should the tories have one more roll of the tories have one more roll of the dice and put someone new in charge? also tonight is britain an institutionally racist country? no go, says my mark meets guest tony sewell, a prominent man of colour in the house of lords, whose report on the issue saw him attacked, demonised and stripped of an honorary degree cancelled for having the wrong opinions. lord tony sewell joins me live shortly and looking forward

mark meadows was the chair of the house freedom caucus. these people i rewatched it this weekend. they grilled him at length and michael cohen, lady davis later said that when they did the first murder board, basically testing it out, michael cohen, blew a gasket and lost his mind is lindy davis was calling him a liar at the end of it, lady davis, it was his attorney and said congrats by republicans will be high-fiving you if that how you act at that hearing tomorrow. and michael cohen understood the message. and so it's not like they're going to be surprised by the cross-examination. hear the question is how michael cohen handles that? and how it appeals to the jury. >> there must be a fun weekend watching that. yeah, i really want to hang out with you. let's take a short break the trump hush money trial gavel to gavel coverage, the way only cnn can bring it to you, legal insight, expert analysis, and real-time updates live from the courtroom follow the facts, follow the testimony, follows. >> cnn fertile thinking i'm thinking about her honeymoon about africa so far, hot air balloon rise when with elephants, weight three, four to safar