mark dubowitz represents today but they know better with that international monitoring organization. i saw that firsthand. so with the opportunity that we have to negotiate and agreed anyway to have an agreement is more intrusive and verification from the international atomic energy agency not those who previously told us as a stakeholder the manufactured information of the nuclear weapons program. said to have that upon the table got to have the interest groups say what is going on. >> use a the supreme leader is someone that could be trusted? what about the iranian supreme leader? >> guest: i don't think anybody should be interest bond dash trusted rather president of united states or iran. we have a lot to hold our government accountable. in what is so important here and but we can do for our our own interest and even to go beyond that. and the al myers and that is something else side of the interest. we want the incredibly successful nonproliferation treaty. the only thing they did is better 75% israel and pakistan that is what we don't want. >> host: now we go to jamaica on the

mark dubowitz.t of all, is very important to establish the fact mark dubowitz is with the israeli organization national foundation for democracy like another think tank is the israeli organization. >> host: let's let him respond. >> guest: i don't work for the national foundation so we are an american think tank supported by americans we take no money from foreign governments and we're committed to defending the security but talk about hillary who is a courageous but lonely voice. with the position on sanctions contradict not only the obama administration and but the bipartisan congress with the entire community that believes they are brought along to the table but they fear coercive power of these sanctions will make you believe you can come to the table to these hardened and with the just mere engagement of decades of nuclear infrastructure with the program put together through billions of dollars of investment anybody who is engaged in international diplomacy buying a used car or a house are nego

host: mark dubowitz --mary schiavo.: he makes a great point because the origin of that will was innocent enough and that is that something happens to the pilot, and we have had cases of the united states where pilots have suffered heart attacks, seizures, blacked out. then you have a situation where something has happened to the pilot and other one might be using the facilities and you have a fight attendant in their to say, hey, get back up here and get on the call -- the communication line and get things moving. it starts out innocently enough for it was simply a safely measure. also, people would recall that helio's flight. the pilot. -- that killed the pilot. they eventually passed out and died in a fight attendant came in. some of this actually does not stem from people expecting that pilots will try to kill passengers but the fact that they might have a medical emergency which has happened many times in the past, so it wasn't innocent origin that has secondarily the beneficiary -- that has a secondary beneficiary.

host: let's hear from mark dubowitz. do you want to talk about the role that israel plays and some of the concerns the caller brings up? guest: first of all, i admire hillary's passion. i appreciate it focuses on the substance than the personal attacks. if she knew nothing about my history, i am certainly not publicly advocating for war in iraq. i am absolutely committed to negotiations as the caller said. i think peaceful negotiation is the way to go. the issue of israel is an interesting one because hillary talked about the failure of the bush administration. it was a failure of intelligence . it was a failure of the intelligence community, not just the cia, but intelligence agencies from around the world. what i think that points to is that we have done a very bad job of being able to detect when a country builds nuclear weapons. we missed the soviet union china, israel, india, pakistan. we actually underestimate how far along saddam's program was in the early 1990's and we overestimated how far along it was in 2003 a

mark dubowitz of foundation for defense of democracies doubts iran will comply with any agreement, even if negotiators think it is iron ironclad. >> there is certainly no reason to trust this regime and i think even less reason to trust any verification regime we put in place that has been blessed by the supreme leader. >> the obama administration says iran has tug as promised during the last 18 months of talks and that gives u.s. officials hopes in the last most difficult rounds of negotiations. margaret brennan, cbs news, lausanne switzerland. >> glor: in his interview with cbs news secretary kerry criticized the letter 47 republican senators sent to iran warning any nuclear deal would end after president obama's deal is over. freshman senator tom cotton of arkansas was behind the letter addadd defended the move on "face the nation". here is mark elder. >> in an interview with bob schieffer, senator tom cotton dismissed seven days of intense criticism at home and abroad. >> do you feel you have not weakened the president's hand here and do you have any regrets about the way you went a

we take it up with john bolton, and mark dubowitz . and president's foreign policy failures are taking a toll, a third of republicans say president obama poses a more threat to u.s. than putin. a triple digit rally on wall street. more later. we begin in switzerland iran and u.s. are hammering out a deal. prime minister netanyahu today again attacked the emerging agreement, saying that the deal emerges, sends a message that there is no cost for aggressions, and in turn a reward for iran's agression. joining us john bolton, this is -- we're hearing all sorts of us is spence full, dramatic descriptions of what is happening, but some kind of deal will emerge whether a good or bad deal or it is temporary or something that will be lasting? >> i think it may not come until april fool's day i believe that john kerry will declare victory and geneva and said there is an agreement for more negotiations. the imperative for success politically for the administration outweighs the substance. lou: a missed deadline in july, and november, maybe march

joining us tonight, mark dubowitz director of the foundation of defense for democracy. good to have you back with us. >> thank you. >> let's start, if we may, what's happened in denmark and the threat the clear threat, from the russian government vladimir putin making it clear through his ambassador that denmark's participation in the european mission shield would make their warships targets of russian nuclear missiles. your reaction? >> if putin continues to provoke and he provokes because he realizes that there's going to be no price for these continuous provocations. he is fighting a war and he's in the ukraine, he has annexed crimea, he has threatened other european countries and all he's been hit with are a number of sanctions that may have been somewhat painful. but for putin this is about rebuilding the russian empire and this is about russian nationalism. and he sees in the white house a president who began with a reset and is now, essentially, resorted to ineffectual action. if you're vladimir putin why wouldn't you continue? >> do we understand vladimir putin

joining us tonight, mark dubowitz director of the foundation of defense for democracy.ou. >> let's start, if we may, what's happened in denmark and the threat the clear threat, from the russian government vladimir putin making it clear through his ambassador that denmark's participation in the european mission shield would make their warships targets of russian nuclear missiles. your reaction? >> if putin continues to provoke and he provokes because he realizes that there's going to be no price for these continuous provocations. he is fighting a war and he's in the ukraine, he has annexed crimea, he has threatened other european countries and all he's been hit with are a number of sanctions that may have been somewhat painful. but for putin this is about rebuilding the russian empire and this is about russian nationalism. and he sees in the white house a president who began with a reset and is now, essentially, resorted to ineffectual action. if you're vladimir putin why wouldn't you continue? >> do we understand vladimir putin and his motivations better than we underst

the next "washington journal" we will have hillary mann leverett and marketable wits on -- and mark dubowitzthen a discussion on the mental health of pilots. "washington journal" is lied every morning here on c-span -- is live every weekday morning here on c-span. >> now, remarks from tennessee senator bob corker on u.s. foreign-policy challenges. senator corker chairs the foreign relations committee. he spoke at an event hosted by the national republican lawyers conference. >> first be sure you are right then go ahead. i think that could be applied to bob corker. he does not act until he is convinced he is on the wright pat. -- on the right path. he lived out the american dream. he formed a construction company that became a multimillion dollar business operating in 18 states. he then became commissioner of finance for the state of tennessee where he astounded members of the legislature with his breck -- with his breathtaking candor and transparency. apparently there easily astounded. or transparency and candor are a rare thing in finance. he was elected mayor of chattanooga he presided ove