i have to get fuhrman in on this. mark, i don't -- i'm a big supporter of the police, everyone knows that. but this was, we have 58 americans dead, we had 498 injured, we're not going to release this search warrant, not going to release that search warrant. we have one woman who got paid money while this thing was happening, he wired her money, she deleted her facebook account, before his name was released to the public she's deleting facebook accounts. that was odd. >> well, laura, randy is absolutely correct, i think it's slap in the face of the homicide detectives that do this for a living, officer-involved shooting team deal with deaths but usually involves officers. i'm sure that the thought process was that they handle a lot of ballistics and a lot of tracking, the path of bullets, they would be better, i guess, informed to handle this since the shooter is dead. that being said, the one thing i didn't like about this investigation, you had too many heavies, too many chiefs, too many from the big tower talking in thes

we're not getting the right answers from the people in authority. >> laura: mark fuhrman, we know in days after the shooting, certain isis websites had claimed that steph general paddock had converted to islam six months earlier. now we have no evidence that he had in that photo, the only photo of him, he has a shot glass, if he converted to islam probably wouldn't be drinking but maybe he would be. could this be, could there be something here or is it irresponsible, even to raise that possibility, given what we know now? >> well, look at this. isis will take a claim of any mass murder in hopes that nobody else will claim it, then they get credit for it, then they are of course terrorists and that creates terror. when you look at this, you have to look at the evidence. that's all we can deal with, is the evidence. you can make they aries, you can dream things up -- you can make theorys, hope things to be. but until you have evidence you can't make any kind of conclusion that that's what occurred. the evidence here is we had a sole gunman that actually supplied, put in action, set up

mark fuhrman got in trouble, not so much for working the crime scene but because of racial epithets thathad uttered earlier in his career. that is how seriously we take bias. i don't know why the left can concede that these two agents could never be a part of the investigation in this case. >> tucker: he would think that democrats come at some point it would occur to them that may be most fbi's are not liberal. i would bet money on that. if you allow the fbi to let their agents make decisions on the basis of their political beliefs, maybe that will hurt democrats at some point. maybe all of us have an interest in clean and ethical government but they don't seem to have an interest in that right now. why? >> i don't know. i don't like bias. i don't like political bias manifesting itself in an embezzlement case, a bank robbery case. this was an incredibly politically charged case, as was and is the russia investigation. so politics and political bias is even more important in a case like this. i don't know why the left is straining to minimize the manifest bias that was exhibited by these