kelly who supports them completely has been on with us before, and defense attorney mark geragos.y will comment on this case and then we'll get to hear what edda and curt think about what they say after this. ( coughs ) - no vacation? - ( laughing ) i can't afford it. you can if you name your own price. - i don't know how. - it's easy. priceline has insider deals-- empty hotel rooms, open plane seats. ( laughing ) you can save up to half off! that's a great deal! saving money is no laughing matter. ( laughs ) woman: (thinking) so, i stick this bounce bar inside my dryer and for about four months, it'll freshen my clothes automatically? wow, let's see you in action. hmm, i wish all my chores took care of themselves automatically. ( ♪ ) (dryer buzzing) ( sniffing ) enjoy automatic freshness for about four months with the new bounce dryer bar. for about four months about all the discounts boswe're offering. i've got. i some catchphrases that'llideas make these savings even more memorable. gecko: all right... gecko: good driver discounts. now that's the stuff...? boss: how 'bout this?

mark geragos, what's your read on this? >> i think amanda's parents have got a real beef here.nk every parent's worst nightmare to send your child overseas and have them get ensnared in something like this. and by all accounts the evidence was anything but overwhelming and certainly not convincing. this -- i don't know who said it whether it was them or one of the other relatives. somebody had a great statement that i heard which was they weren't trying amanda, they were trying some fictional character. and it sure sounds like that's exactly what happened. >> larry: edda, is that what you feel? >> oh, absolutely. it's amazing. everything that was said in court about amanda, we're all looking at each other going who are they talking about? and it didn't even follow the evidence of the people that knew her and testified about her. it was just weird fantasy bizarre. >> larry: john, you've really been involved in this. you've been on with us before about it. would this have been different if this were the united states? >> well, i think so. there's been injustice here, there's been

to discuss this, here in los angeles, mark geragos, the famed defense attorney. in new york, howard bragman, the celebrity publicist and crisis communications expert. what's your overall read on this story, mark? >> i think you've got a situation where, number one, there is some criminal exposure, which is why the police want to talk to them. >> larry: exposure for whom? >> for both. you've got a situation where the police are investigating number one whether they believe domestic violence took place. so that would target tiger's wife and number two, you have the parallel investigation, was he driving under the influence. so when you hear reports today by the sheriff saying or the police department saying that they want to get a search warrant for the blood records or for the injuries, well, that is two-fold. they may want to see the injuries to see if they're consistent with a traffic accident. >> larry: he's not an elected official, not a minister taking people's money. does he owe speaking at all? >> you know, he has every right to say, no thank you. i don't wi

mark geragos. well-known defense attorney. in atlanta, president of cornwell. and described him dollars an a cleaner, a man with making high profile athletes problems disappear. pat o'brien, you know him, you have interviewed him. how surprised were you? >> i was surprised, larry, i think in this day and age, nobody goes undefeated. and that includes tiger woods, i think he's a victim of his own image. the one that he set up for himself. i'm a little more surprised that it's getting as much or more coverage than the 30,000 men and women we're sending to war from the speech of obama the other night. you know what which he pointed out in the statement that was five days late, he's human. these things happen. >> larry: was it too late, howard? >> it was too late. it was the second statement. and i think there's a better way to do it than another statement. i think people wanted to hear tiger. people like tiger. they want to hear him. when you don't -- >> larry: he should have done what, radio? >> he should have called you literally on the air. called somebody he w