. >> sean: mark geragos is back and kimberly guilfoyle. you can see her on the upcoming new show here on fox, it is call the five. welcome all of you. i'm tired of the jury getting beaten up. second guessing, attacking them. how could they come to this verdict? i was 95% there, when she lied about where she worked. when she lied about a rich boyfriend. the nanny that she lies about. you had me. the defense needed to take me five yards to the goal line. they couldn't do it, within the parameters of the law which is fundamental to our system of justice. innocent until proven guilty. the standard is on the defense, they didn't get me there kimberly -- i'm sorry on the prosecution's side. >> i think the jurors deserve credit for being sequestered away from their families. however, i respect the jury system and usually think they get it right. i don't think in this case they did based on the sum total of the evidence to just find her guilty of lying to a law enforcement officer. it doesn't seem they took sufficient time to go through all of the

or to be the most famous attorney in america with a new agent that wants to go become the next mark geragos or whatever it is that he has in mind. it's very, very disturbing. it's truly disturbing to me and to many people who are out there looking at this and seeing what we see as a broken system. >> i agree, by the way -- >> alan dershowitz, let me just put to you what you said to me. you said it wasn't about justice for caylee. >> that's right. >> but to me on any human level, that's exactly what this was about. and, yes, you can hide behind legal semantics about what the case was technically about. but the reality is a very young girl lost her life and we appear to be no nearer the truth now than we were before. and frankly, we probably never will be now. so we haven't got justice for this girl, and people are angry about that. >> well, if you want justice, don't look to the criminal law system. that's not its job. its job is not produce a just result. its job is to produce a legally just result. we have a system that says better ten go free than one innocent be confined. if you have a 6

when you too that like mark geragos did in the peterson case, the jury is left with a gaping hole. to create reasonable doubt, he'll have to pull a rabbit out of a hat. i don't know what he's going to do. this prosecution's closing argument was very strong, very compelling and some of the words that he used. that casey could put caylee out of the mind the way he could put the truth out of her mind and the desire from freedom and freedom from the burden of motherhood was really compelling because i think any parent can put themselves in the position of having to deal with children, how difficult parenthood is. how much you give up when you're a parent to your child. and when you decide to become a parent, you give that up with joy. >> casey anthony did not do that. >> she was going to get rid of her child. >> we'll take a quick break. the prosecution did talk about the ultimate sacrifice that casey anthony made, her child. we'll have much more. >> in 10 minutes or so, the court will be back in session. jose baez will give his closing statement. we'll hear that. here's jeff ashton in

. >> possibly staying at mandarin oriental at the bar with mark geragos, all sorts of rumors going onin our society. make no mistake, she is a criminal, and convicted of four counts of lying, and her daughter was missing. can the taxpayers who paid for her defense attorneys be reimbursed? can the taxpayers be reimbursed for the cost of prosecutions? the truth is yes. at the end of the day it's only for a small amount because remember she was acquitted of murder one. she was acquitted of the more serious charges, so, the money that the state can recoup from her a minimal and now the lawyers are looking for money for experts, we had to pay this one, that one the other one and the florida taxpayers are footing the bill. >> juliet: ultimately she's going to cash in though. >> she is going to cash in, it's a sad commentary and she will can cash in, a lot of offers apparently on the table, but some networks that are saying we don't want to run it, we don't want to be complicit in what we think is an interview, money for what she's done. >> juliet: your show tonight? >> about two murder myst