and yet you've got this guy, mark pomerance, wrote a book that was unethical. it was about a case and he was in the middle of the investigation up. and you've got alvin trump hater, letitia james , the attorney general in new york , a trump later. >> this is what they do in third world countries. well, it's worse than that. you know, she ran for office, letitia james on the campaign pledge to get trump. that's how i name my book, get trump. i didn't make up that. i got it from her campaign. she went out on the streets. she said , i promise you, if you elect me, i will get trump. and if you can do it to trump, you can do it next month to your uncle charlie or your nephew. this is so dangerous. this is so much in violation. is 60 years of teaching and practicing criminal law. i have never seen a greater abuse of prosecutorial discretion and i have seen plenty of abuses. this is the worst even in the al capone case. they went after him for tax, but he was guilty of tax. he didn't make that up here. they had to make up the misdemeanor, make up a felony, relate to f

they play out is the lack of objectivity coming out of that office, especially when you bring in mark pomerance in to play here. he's one of two investigators that resigned in protest after when alvin bragg joined office or appointed in office in 2022. he resigned in protest. he said there's nothing more to investigate. everybody has declined to pros cute. and pomerance was brought from a law firm, he's not a prosecutor. a law firm that chuck schumer's brother practices at and a heavy donor to hillary clinton. so in terms of the deck being stacked, it's not an objective prosecutor pursuing justice to begin with. >> no doubt. they called this case a zombie case in the da's office. why? as you point out, sdny didn't bring the case. and the sec commissioner shed doubt on the case. the prior d.a. did not bring the case. pomerance had interest in it. what would the interest be of alvin bragg to bring forward a case that was not on firm foot something why would you bring a case that you're going to lose? i can't get in alvin bragg's head but i can postulate two motives. one is this pomerance individu

yesterday demanding that documents and congressional testimony from former special prosecutors mark pomerancee dunn who resigned after not prosecuting trump over financial crimes. >> the only thing that changes between then and now, president trump announces he's running for president and most importantly pomerance and dunn, these two individuals that worked as assistants, resigning start protesting, write a book and create this pressure on alvin bragg from the left. suddenly he decides oh, now i'm going to indict president trump. >> the earliest the grand jury can reconvene is monday. martha? >> martha: thanks. let's get back to the heart of this matter with robert costello, michael cohen's former legal adviser and partner at david, hutcher and citron. good to have you here with us today. you hear what's going on. they cancelled for a second day after you went in there and testified. is this unraveling? i mean, what is your take on what is going on behind those courtroom walls right now? >> well, in fairness, i don't know what is going on behind those courtroom walls. i can certainly make an

letters yesterday demanding documents and congressional testimony from former special prosecutors mark pomerance who publicly resided from bragg office last year after removing forward with prosecuting trump over financial crimes. >> the only thing that changes between then and now is president trump announces he's running for president and most importantly, i think pomerance and dunn, these two individuals, resign, start pitching a fit and protesting and write a book and create this pressure on alvin bragg from the left, and suddenly, he decides oh, now i'm going to indict president trump. reporter: amid reporting for fox news digital there's major deception in the da's office over reported weakness in this case. the grand jury decided not to meet for a second day, liz, and the earliest they can reconvene is on monday. >> elizabeth: by the hour, bryan llenas, thanks so much for your journalism. good to have you on that story. joining us the chairman of house administration congressman style congressman, we thank you for joining us tonight. it's good to see you again. so, congressman, let's go r

informatand , you know, the conn alvin bragg and his henchmen, mark pomerance, who specifically says in his book were targeting zombi because we don't like hishi beliefs. those guys should face disbarment proceedings. all right, greg jarrett, thank . you, professor.t it's called get trump" amazon.com bookstorese come everywhere. when we comeac back , a major programing announcement straight aheada . shop now for michael. lowest prices of the season on thousands of items with 70 percent of kansas and 60 percent austrian beats. plus, check out big vogels frayn's and half of spring and easter decor. save, storewide and online now through march 26 . >> do you have trouble hearing conversations? are you constantly asking loved ones to repeat themselves? do you miss out on discussions or talking with friends? then you would benefit from neno hearing aids. don't waste thousands of dollars on expensive hearing aids or settle with the frustration of cheap amplifiers. right now you can get to revolutionary nano cic, recharge hearing aids regularly . seven hundred ninety four dollars for just t

and , you know tha, you canr' read that that idiot marks pomerance, his book, who violated all sort of grand w jury secrecy laws, hadrote a fiduciary duty to keep things confidential. you read his book, he eve and instead wrote a book. and if you read his book, he even said it was amazing whatitt he admitted there, that he was just looking for a crime to fit the person. and that's not whaouldt we do. b it's not what we shouldnhatta be doing clearly here. the manhattan district attorney's office has stoopedins to that level. if they are looking at this sinl foormy daniels case, because one thing is clear that everyra single legal scholar, former members of the federal electiona committee have opined that no crime was here, that there wasuh no campaign law violation at all. >> well, let me ask you, this is an article by msn .com, and the headline is prosecutingn trump. stormy daniels money would include hurdles, according to expertsgxperts. he at one point, they say if braggd were to do this, it says itprosc would be unusual for a state prosecutor to use an alleged violation of a federal