before, in the case of mark wilmots, the person who handled the hearing was someone who had a series of assignments and connections, which was an issue that was discussed. in this regard, i have to tell you that the receiving authority must be neutral okay, but there are two or three very serious points in this case that i think should be addressed. whether these punishments were in accordance with the legal standards or not, this is a very important issue. the second issue is the discussion of a fair trial, that is, a fair trial is a necessary condition, according to his excellency's statement regarding the statements, but it is not a sufficient condition, that is, the principle of supervision should be exactly the same, that is, i agree with this. i believe that the afc disciplinary committee there is enough time to deal with this matter. the vote was issued very hastily. there is a question in the vote now that this amount is 200,000 dollars , and it should be paid within 30 days. now , how long does this appeal usually take? the usual appeal process, if it is to be the usual proc