>> deputy city attorney marla byrnes through the president. i think what you may be getting at, and please clarify if i'm not answering the question that you're asking, is what is the project that's being reviewed under environmental review here. and c-e-q-a requires that we look at what the wrote et is as proposed in comparison to what the baseline conditions are. ~ so, this project doesn't propose to change pumping protocols, then the city is not required as lead agency to look at potential changes to pumping protocols. pumping protocols are taken as a given as the underlying condition of the project and we compare whatever changes the project proposes. so, i think one of the questions here is, you know, what is the project the rec/park is proposing, that which is reviewed under environmental review. >> so, so, if the project is defined to include pumping operations then it's a different project description? >> exactly. and it's a different project description -- rec/park as a policy matter can propose changes to the project and then environ