>> deputy city attorney marlena byrne. if i could provide a little bit of context because i think there are a bunch of laws that are intersecting here which may make it -- >> i understand that. but i want to be very clear and simple about what i'm asking. so, there are mitigations that were taken in the c-e-q-a document. do we have confirmation from the federal agency that found us in violation in 2005 that those mitigations are sufficient to meet our legal obligations? >> sarah james environmental review officer. yes, we do have that confirmation since the mitigations come from the biological opinion that was provided to us. by fish and wildlife. >> well, so, do you have a letter? do you have an opinion that states that? >> the opinion is the biological opinion, it's a 70-page report with a great amount of detail that spells out, as i said, over 40 measures that were we're required to implement in order to offset both the operation of the golf course ~ and for the specific project. >> let me he ask the city attorney this.