that relationships of dependency of to be governed i what our former colleague martha fineman calledthe sexual family. that is the proof of the problem. but it is perfectly consistent with the logic of the liberal capital and the contract into which those persons who get married, whatever their sexual orientation alongside fat, all so seeing what i think might be called as the emergence of a new sexual orientation. you have pomo norma to the heterosexual not as to the, the alignment of the normative, the normal with marital status with the you are gay or lesbian or heterosexual, i think is a moment of sexual realignment which in many ways corresponds to the moments of racial realignment we have seen in the age of neoliberalism, so i think it is a difficult but important question that you ask but we have to see the connections between the national, the transnational, and global capital under neoliberalism. >> if i can had one more thing, one of the chapters in the book in the historical sections talks about why northern soldiers or missionaries were forcing newly freed people to marry