reuben, junius & rose representing the martin building company thank you for your attention the legal arguments are clear that was one clear simple idea do appellant is they can't pick and choose the planning code they apply to the project it is coming down to that simple there is really no dispute about the facts and part of amendment the 329 changed in many version the planning code what the planning commission and planning department staff look at it and approved the project that is today's planning code not finding of any kind to grant this expectation on interesting pattern by the way, really not that unusual that the planning code is riesdz in 2014 over 20 new all the times many 201532 code amendment and there are 8 with 14 more pend if we got into an argument 0 nothing would be settle we point back to this and that shouldn't have been changed the appellant says - again, this is the way the code was written in 2015 and not read the day we had the hearing before the commission and still not there appellant cites no case law and logic that supports that and allows them to point to another code and let go back in time we don't know what the app

reuben, junius & rose representing the martin building company thank you for your attention the legal arguments are clear that was one clear simple idea do appellants they can't pick and choose the planning code they apply to the project it is coming down to that simple there is really no dispute about the facts and part of amendment the 329 changed in many version the planning code what the planning commission and planning department staff look at it and approved the project that is today's planning code not finding of any kind to grant this expectation on interesting pattern by the way, really not that unusual that the planning code is riesdz in 2014 over 20 new all the times many 201532 code amendment and there are 8 with 14 more pend if we got into an argument 0 nothing would be settle we point back to this and that shouldn't have been changed the appellant says - again, this is the way the code was written in 2015 and not read the day we had the hearing before the commission and still not there appellant cites no case law and logic that supports that and allows them to point to another code and let go back in time we don't know what the appli

. >> martin appel from the council of scientific society presidents. the world is making rapid change. the united states is changing what caused you to use the word work, what the workforce is throughout the digital instrumentation in the economy and so forth. are we using the right measures to talk about that productivity, talking about growth when in fact it may be 40% of our people are free agent working at home and creating economic value, but not following the models and the policy we've been using for so long? >> there is clearly been a lot of change not just technology, but as you say modes of business organization. whether or not that is all measured accurately is a question that probably won't be resolved quickly. in the 1990s we haven't seen at the time the full benefit from technology, even though we knew it had to be there. except with the lag. i think that whatever the measure is, we know that the things we can do as policymakers to promote more innovation, to promote research and development, to promote more training to build infrastructu