could no longer claim to be the party of diversity, equality and anti—racism. 0ur religion editor, martin bashir what do you make of this? this is a highly exceptional, significant contribution by the leader of a religious denomination during the general election campaign. the chief rabbi has oversight for half of those in the uk to identify as practising jewish, and he is saying that labour's claim that they are doing everything in their powers to root out anti—semitism, using his powers, mendacious fiction, and that a new poison has taken root in the labour party, sanctioned from the very top. he says that, while he is not in a position to tell people how to vote, the chief rabbi asks, how complicit in prejudice would a leader of her majesty's opposition to be —— have to be in order to be considered unfit for high office? that feels like a rhetorical question. last week, the archbishops of york and canterbury issued a joint statement, appealing to voters and politicians to honour the truth and challenge of false herds, no reference to individual candidates or party leaders. —— challenge all fa