unfortunately, that's often not how the world works, and, you know, we all know that our good friend martin indyk left brookings to try to go negotiate palestinian/israeli peace n. the relatively unlikely event that he succeeds, there could be an implementation force to make that acceptable to the israelis. that's one example. i awe lewded to a couple of others. if we wind up preventing iran from developing a nuclear weapon and have to use military power, the idea that this is a one-off, we bomb, they hit one of our embassies and we all call a truce, i think, is pretty optimistic. and there's a decent chance we're going to have to reinforce some of our allies in the gulf with some american ground presence to remind lan -- iran that we have an interest in these countries. you better be able to do one all-out war like korea, heaven forbid, but also two simultaneous smaller missions, but they could be long lasting. and hopefully they're multilateral, but they could be long lasting, and that's where i come up with an army that, to me, should be around 450,000 active duty soldierings. the scmr venn --